Forums

Cheltenham Festival

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 329 comments are related to the topic:
Dynaste CANNOT win the RSA Chase

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 7 of 9  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 329
By:
CVByrne
When: 18 Feb 13 21:51
cause and effect, I believe Captain Chris benefitted with staying well away from the battles up front. Long Run and Champ Court took eachother on and the latter cracked, Long Run then idles, CC comes to challenge and jumps the last much better. Long Run then pick up and stays on to win.

I thing Long Run is the most dour stayer I'll ever see in my life. We'll never ever see the bottom of him. He just lacks any gears and need a ferocious end to end gallop to be seen at his best. Look at the 2011 King George, Kauto went like the clappers down the back and only won because his jumped is pure magic. Long Run galloped on relentlessy but the line came for Kauto. It was a demonstration of pure genius riding by Ruby Walsh. His best ever ride imv.

Long Run suffered terribly by Kauto pulling up in Gold Cup, the pace plummeted at end of the first circuit when he'd pulled up, from top of hill to the stands was 6s slower than 2011 race. But the race up until then and on the final circuit were run in indentical times. This gave a huge mid race breather for the filed and resulted in the bunch finish sprint at the end.

Long Run, is a seriously talented stayer. If he gets his jumping right and a fierce gallop in Gold Cup he's a huge danger.

Bit of a tangent there.
By:
cause and effect
When: 18 Feb 13 22:09
Agree with you there on LR. POint was I was trying to make was I thought Dynaste's Feltham was more of a speed test on account of the race made easier by having two fences omitted AND a moderate early pace that saw the field well bunched for the majority of the race.

the KG pace was ferocious and relentless and I thought that was the first time I ever saw LR idle. The way he came back showed he had plenty in the tank hence the conclusion that the two fences omitted made the races easier and in LR's case, not so much of a test. GL! Always good to hear your views.
By:
CVByrne
When: 18 Feb 13 22:16
Yep agree with your views on those races.
By:
Tory
When: 18 Feb 13 22:34
Does the fact that the feltham was run 3's quicker than the king George hinder that argument though? Appreciate LR was carrying 3lbs more weight
By:
Tory
When: 18 Feb 13 23:11
I've just watched the Cleeve and World Hurdle back from last year and feel there are a number of notable points to be made regarding Dynaste and his ability to see out 3M in a proper test:

1. The Cleeve was run at a far, far slower pace than the World Hurdle. The Cleeve was 13.5 seconds slower and this for me played into the hands of Dynaste and not Big Buck's, hence the reason why Dynaste was able to get so close and look such a good stayer. He has absolutely on his legs two out in the World Hurdle yet people were saying OW wasn't a stayer, who put in a far superior performance.

2. Dynaste has a very high knee action. If we get soft ground he might get away with it but IF it comes up good, he wont act as well and this of course dramatically affects his chances.

3. The key reason for people saying he will bust the stats this year is lack of credible opposition, and it's hard to disagree. We don't appear to have anything of Bob's Worth's class BUT Ruby knows how to beat Dynaste. Boston Bob will stay all day and as long as we get a decent pace, he will kick a long way from home, just as he did with Big Buck's in the World Hurdle. He may not be as good as was thought, but the JP Moriarty has shown how he needs to be ridden and they will make the most of him. I also genuinely believe Boston Bob will be better on good ground.

I love these debates and everyone's entitled to their opinion. For me if it's soft and the race is allowed to go at a crawl, Dynaste may be near impossible to beat. However, if we get goodish ground and a proper champion pace, I think the white flag will be raised turning for home
By:
Tory
When: 18 Feb 13 23:11
I've just watched the Cleeve and World Hurdle back from last year and feel there are a number of notable points to be made regarding Dynaste and his ability to see out 3M in a proper test:

1. The Cleeve was run at a far, far slower pace than the World Hurdle. The Cleeve was 13.5 seconds slower and this for me played into the hands of Dynaste and not Big Buck's, hence the reason why Dynaste was able to get so close and look such a good stayer. He has absolutely on his legs two out in the World Hurdle yet people were saying OW wasn't a stayer, who put in a far superior performance.

2. Dynaste has a very high knee action. If we get soft ground he might get away with it but IF it comes up good, he wont act as well and this of course dramatically affects his chances.

3. The key reason for people saying he will bust the stats this year is lack of credible opposition, and it's hard to disagree. We don't appear to have anything of Bob's Worth's class BUT Ruby knows how to beat Dynaste. Boston Bob will stay all day and as long as we get a decent pace, he will kick a long way from home, just as he did with Big Buck's in the World Hurdle. He may not be as good as was thought, but the JP Moriarty has shown how he needs to be ridden and they will make the most of him. I also genuinely believe Boston Bob will be better on good ground.

I love these debates and everyone's entitled to their opinion. For me if it's soft and the race is allowed to go at a crawl, Dynaste may be near impossible to beat. However, if we get goodish ground and a proper champion pace, I think the white flag will be raised turning for home
By:
alleged22
When: 18 Feb 13 23:16
will  RW even be on BB??
By:
Tory
When: 18 Feb 13 23:27
I think he will. Rocky Creek, who has a tremendous profile for this race, doesn't look like he's turning up and I genuinely believe that the last performance could be the best thing that has happened for BB.

Watch last years RSA back - both BW and FL were right at the front a long, long way from home. Ruby will do the same with BB - he'll make a lot of use of him and have him right there as they now realise he probably doesn't have the raw pace they felt before. No better tactical rider at Cheltenham that Ruby either.

My biggest fear with BB is how long it will take for him to move up through the gears but as long as Ruby gets the pace right, that should be OK.

Know he could end up on Unioniste but i'd be surprised.
By:
alleged22
When: 18 Feb 13 23:30
Know he could end up on Unioniste but i'd be surprised.

it wouldnt suprise me one bit Wink
By:
cause and effect
When: 19 Feb 13 00:09
Does the fact that the feltham was run 3's quicker than the king George hinder that argument though? Appreciate LR was carrying 3lbs more weight

Not really as the early pace was much more searching that demands more from every horse from the very start. Out of 16 fences, Long Run's race was SEVEN seconds quicker in the early stage through to the 13th fence with Long Run's relentless nature not allowing any breathers into his rivals causing the race pace to collapse. In any case, Long Run clearly idled and could've run faster if needed. With 3 to jump, Dynaste's race developed into something of a sprint to home and the early steady pace allowed the Feltham horses to simply jump in relative comfort giving Dynaste plenty left.

Given Dynaste jumped 16 fences on his first two chasing starts, the only difference is the longer distances between fences and that favours speed as jumping fences will surely ebb more at a horse's stamina reserves then given a breather before another fence.
By:
Tory
When: 19 Feb 13 00:12
Maybe. I've just watched back Unioniste's two runs this year and BB's last race.

At the time I was in shock that BB almost lost but it turns into a sprint for home turning the home bend which has one fence and can only be a few furlongs. I've never been more convinced that a fast pace, hill and extra 3F will suit BB.

If it's allowed to turn into a sprint finish then Dynaste will win doing handstands. Logic tells you that it wont though
By:
Tory
When: 19 Feb 13 00:13
That wasn't a response to you by the way cause and effect!

Cheers for your opinion though
By:
judorick
When: 19 Feb 13 00:24
if you are right the current 8.6 BB would seem generous, no?
By:
Tory
When: 19 Feb 13 00:32
I'm on at 8.2 from October and also have a 35/1 HF & BB double so won't be going in again just yet. TBF, what happens with HF will determine if or how much i go in on him again on the day.

Stats wise I'm a tad concerned about only 2 races pre festival which has tamed my conviction but having watched his last race back, I think I'll get over that.

Will lay dynaste at the time but what else I'll do is up in the air due to bets down already
By:
judorick
When: 19 Feb 13 00:38
I am gonna have to go in at this price. Very little else is suggesting itself to me. Something in my unconscious putting me off Unioniste (Dom Alco???) and after that... RC unlikely runner.

Can envisage BB coming up the hill
By:
Tory
When: 19 Feb 13 00:49
I do like Dom Alco's, just not at 5 in the 3m RSA.  If BB turns up he's an EW banker but then would assume his price will be more 9/2 than 15/2.
By:
Arklearkle
When: 19 Feb 13 01:34
Bill Shankly would probably say that the RSA does not suit the Drury Lane dancers especially if there is proper pace in the race. Perhaps WM will have another runner in the race also.
By:
buddeliea
When: 19 Feb 13 07:46
lets face it,if you judged every horse by its runs against big Bucks then none of them stay

That was a bit tongue in cheek CV,though i think you know what i meant.
For me its all about his chase form,and he HAS stayed 3m.
Yes its possible he may struggle a tad to get it at Cheltenham if they try to get into his stamina,but whats good enough to do that??

I just cannot see anything in the race that looks anywhere near good enough to give him a race,and those that try and take him through the limit will pay the price imo.
Boston Bob is probably the most likely decent opposition and watching him is like watching paint dry,sorry,but imo hes as slow as they come.Maybe the ground will make a difference to him,who knows,but hes looked to me pretty average at best this season.
Dynaste imo will laugh at him.
By:
CVByrne
When: 19 Feb 13 08:30
bud that's the thing with the RSA, forget who looks good in trials, look at the RSA profile. What horse most looks like an RSA winner, not who looks like the best horse. Dynaste looks a far better horse than this lot. But Grands Crus looked a better stayer over hurdles, he beat 2 of the favourites for Gold Cup at Kempton, he ran his only good race this year in the King George too.

Kempton is Kempton, 3m round there is not 3m round Cheltenham. They go a fierce gallop at Cheltenham and the race is littered with stayers. You simply want to back the best stayer. Nothing else.

So you need to forget this best horse mentality. Go with the best RSA profile horse.
By:
alleged22
When: 19 Feb 13 08:50
the fact he is only 5 does not bother me, he is and will continue to improove, of the rsa principles he has won the most competitive race this season granted off a low weight ( handicapper got it all wrong) but i don,t think the extra weight would have stoped him, while dynaste has dictated in small fields, boston bob took a whole half mile to change gear???? people will say unioniste has 8 lenghts to make up on dynaste, yes over 21f but the rsa is 24 and a half furlongs and i believe this will blunt dynastes speed, and i havnt mentioned all the stats dynaste has to overcome, forget the feltham the biggest stat to overcome is the not run in this calender year, to come and win this race with no prep run is a massive negative imho
By:
Tory
When: 19 Feb 13 08:58
The no prep run is the main reason why i dislike him as well
By:
Roger The Butler
When: 19 Feb 13 09:38
buddeliea 18 Feb 13 19:28
well its all about Big Bucks imo.
Take him out of that cleeve run for example,Dynaste wins the race beating Mourad 10 lenghts,with other stayers further back.


Take Big Buck's out of the World Hurdle from 2009-2011 and you have World Hurdle winners of Punchestowns, Time For Rupert and Grands Crus. Wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference come their RSA Chases the following year when they went off short priced favourites and finished 5th, 5th and 4th respectively. Did they stay in the World Hurdle? Apparently so. Were they RSA Chase winners in waiting? Apparently not.
By:
roobuck
When: 19 Feb 13 10:14
Perhaps those examples who were better hurdlers imo simply didn't cut it as chasers. Perhaps, just perhaps, Dynaste as not such a good hurdler will.

As I say I will find it amusing if he wins though I won't have a bean on him in RSA
By:
Graeme83
When: 19 Feb 13 10:25
"I am gonna have to go in at this price. Very little else is suggesting itself to me. Something in my unconscious putting me off Unioniste (Dom Alco???) and after that... RC unlikely runner."





Something in your unconscious was putting you off a horse because it's out of one the best NH sires ?   Laugh
By:
Roger The Butler
When: 19 Feb 13 10:27
They did cut it as chasers though, that's the point, going into the RSA just as seemingly bulletproof as Dynaste before flopping:
Punchestowns 2 from 2 over fences and 2/1f on the day
Time For Rupert 2 from 2 over fences and 7/4f on the day
Grands Crus 3 from 3 over fences and 6/5f on the day

All had hacked up on all their chase starts prior to the RSA and appeared no less obvious winners of the RSA than Dynaste.

Agree with your final point though - admittedly I will look a right tit should he now win!
By:
roobuck
When: 19 Feb 13 11:01
Roger, have their subsequent efforts over fences not proved that they were not top class chasers?

Its not just you roger, its in fact the 'biblical lay' comments etc that make me smile. I'm not really a stats/trends man and even if Dynaste does win I accept if doesn't change the overall profile of the winner.

Its just that I struggle to see a top class staying chaser in the field to beat him
By:
Tory
When: 19 Feb 13 11:03
I don't think many people thought Bostons angel would beat TFR but he did. Not top class by any stretch but perfect for the RSA and was top stats pick for the race
By:
roobuck
When: 19 Feb 13 11:10
TFR had a issue that meant he missed his prep. That issue in fact turned out to affect his whole career I would suggest, so including him in my previous post is perhaps unfair
By:
Graeme83
When: 19 Feb 13 11:17
A lack of prep beat Time for Rupert. Now, that doesn't mean to say that he merely lost because he didn't have a run after December, but not having a run beforehand can sometimes indicate problems with the horse, which you might not hear about. No way was Bostons Angel 5L better than Rupert, so there was something amiss, which proved to be the case as he was never travelling.
By:
Roger The Butler
When: 19 Feb 13 11:30
Dynaste also falling into that category with no prep too though.

Agree with Roobuck a little on there being no really obvious candidate to beat Dynaste - when I started this thread I did think by now there would be 3-4 contenders that I would expect to give him a tough time, and it appears a fairly weak division this year. However, on RSA morning not many would have had Knockara Beau over Punchestowns, Bostons Angel and Magnanimity over Time For Rupert or Call The Police over Grands Crus. Convinced something non-obvious will come out of the woodwork and run a bigger race than Dynaste on the day, as has happened on those other occasions.

For the record, I am on Boston Bob. Backed him the day before he ran in the Moriarty hoping he would win well and shorten in price. Was disappointed with the run. Could easily have finished 4th. However, can see him staying on well and if it becomes a dogfight, which the RSA often does, he is one to keep on the right side of. My concern with him is that he could get outpaced when they up the tempo and his staying on at the end may only bring him a place. If he can hang on to the leaders when they go for home I am still semi-confident that he can do it.
By:
judorick
When: 19 Feb 13 11:43
fascinating discussions you guys!
By:
buddeliea
When: 19 Feb 13 12:43
Roger,i think you are right that BB wil stay on for a place,its an awful renewal imo.
Dynaste i expect to have finished the race and had a cigar by the time BB finishes.

Still IF he dont stay then he may well get picked up by something.
As CV says,the RSA is often won by those types,and i do recognise that.
Ive backed against all the favs last few years,and apart from last year its worked out well for me,but i honestly cannot see a horse enabling me to do that this year.
I aint had a bet(well i did back Harry TopperSad)and its looking likely i wont,but if he does run in the race and i have a good Tuesday i may back Dynaste if i think the price is worth it.
By:
the bairn
When: 19 Feb 13 13:09
this thread is almost identical as last year's Arkle, 9 out of 10 posters were adamant that Sprinter Sacre would not get up the hill, class told in the end, that could be the case with Dynaste. cheers.
By:
Roger The Butler
When: 19 Feb 13 13:17
Isn't anything like last year's Arkle. Sprinter Sacre was very strong on trends for that race with everything in his favour, Dynaste is incredibly weak on stats.
By:
judorick
When: 19 Feb 13 13:20
indeed

and the people who thought SS vwould get beat were by far in the minority. They just posted on and on about it.
By:
the bairn
When: 19 Feb 13 13:24
Rog. I said" almost identical" cheers.
By:
BJG
When: 19 Feb 13 13:25
Dynaste appears from the mist at David Pipe's stable this morning. Festival race still undecided
By:
judorick
When: 19 Feb 13 13:25
but it is nothing like it at all

cheers
By:
alleged22
When: 19 Feb 13 13:35
this thread is almost identical as last year's Arkle, 9 out of 10 posters were adamant that Sprinter Sacre would not get up the hill, class told in the end, that could be the case with Dynaste. cheers

i think he,ll bolt up the hill in the jewson just not in the rsa.... taa
By:
judorick
When: 19 Feb 13 13:50
you can keep saying it is like Sprinter thread as much as you want

it simply isn't

and that thread started with the OP tipping the horse to win at 7/1 not saying it cannot win

and it was at least 50:50 for and against, frankly it was only Budd who was really adamant, most others had doubts that grew stronger as the price shortened. No one who was on at say 9/4 to the initial 7/1 had much worry

but you carry on
Page 7 of 9  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com