|
By:
I have a great time at chch casino. Always end up ahead.
Go there with my players club vouchers they always sending out , free food and drink , entry to competitions etc. |
|
By:
tomhanks 10 Aug 17:01
this is rubbish, i have seen 16 blacks in a row, that would bankrupt anyone or made them $16 |
|
By:
no ...still doesnt exist
|
|
By:
Put £10 on the colour that has just come in if it comes in again then increase by £5. When the colour changes start again. There is no way of winning at roulette but this is the closest ive got after 20 years. The rule is take £100 in and leave once you made £100. So if youre £80 up but your next bet should be £30 because your on a good run then drop down to £20. Dont be greedy accept a loss and stop. Thoughts please
|
|
By:
so overall are you winning?
|
|
By:
making over 100 euros day on this system ...use common sense...play on pars...if u dont get par for a long time...play in 1st 12,2nd 12, or 3rd 12 if u dont get them for a long time...dont be greedy,use your head(brain if you got one), and know how to stop to make money...but its not 100 % sure
|
|
By:
samuka are you hfc?
|
|
By:
sorry ignore
|
|
By:
Just played Betfair Zero roulette. After about 6 spins I was £3 up and then I hit 10 blacks in a row losing about £40.
Yes the long streaks are more common than you think and the odds of 10 in a row are about 0.1% (1 in a thousand) and this happenned after abou t2 mins of playing. I've never had more than 7 spins in a row go in my favour. I wonder if the Betfair computer is audited and how do they do it ? |
|
By:
this doesnt work anyway.. the 0 always works against you doesnt it? makes your bet slightly worse than evens. although i didnt read all of the thread lol
same principle can apply to all odds against favs in horse racing |
|
By:
WHEN IVE SORTED THE RUBICK CUBE OUT ,I WILL THEN SORT THE ROULETTE WHEEL OUT
|
|
By:
this is a joke, if you had a bank roll of 8k you wouldnt be coming to a casino and sitting for what would take 2-3hrs to make 30 quid, so while the method is statistically correct with an infinite bankroll, practically, its a waste of time.. take 250 of your 8k and whack on black, if it wins, then go play with your 250 and have fun, if it loses hey you still got 7,750 go home and chill
|
|
By:
You use your £8000 to win £30, five times a day and then that's you're full time income
|
|
By:
paulie you are totally walnuts, think about how many spins in a day you would need to do to make 30x5 = 150 quid.. totally unpractical.. and from 8k even a 1pound bet (which you cannot do in a normal casino as you should know on red or black) is 14 straight numbers and kaboom..
|
|
By:
TTT
|
|
By:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfACCAAafp8
watch and learn !!! |
|
By:
Extract from Darrell's book "How to take a chance". On 18 August 1913, at the Casino in Monte Carlo, black came up a record 26 times in succession. There was a near panicky rush to bet on red, beginning about the time black had come up a phenomenal 15 times. In application of the maturity doctrine, players doubled and tripled their stakes, this doctrine leading them to believe after black came up the 20th time that there was not a chance in a million of another repeat. In the end the unusual run enriched the casino by some millions of francs.
Beware the martingale. |
|
By:
well done
|
|
By:
Online casinos are the same as FBOTS, they know where your money is placed in advance then land the ball in the worst place. Random number theory is laughable, try it and see how random it is lol :-)
|
|
By:
ttt
|
|
By:
online wheels are not realllllll, no system will work its programed to win,everyone has there own wheel and are fleeced individually,apart from a tiny percentage that they let win now and then.
|
|
By:
today i lost £245. i bet on 27 numbers. 18 came 9 times 1 came 6 times on which i didn't net wager. what do you think this. **s
|
|
By:
Ya posting everywhere about ya losses, so try reading a few threads ...
Follow the thread in the below, and enough comprehensive answers will be there for you ... Why you should never put a coin in the bookies roulette machines Mr.Smooth |
|
By:
good-luck
|
|
By:
.
|
|
By:
and so it goes on
|
|
By:
dont bet on the same colour. double up on the previous colour which came. ex., you bet on red but black came. next time double up on black. if red comes next doubleup on red and so on
|
|
By:
What about taking a progressive system and implementing it ina game such as black jack, where the chances of losing so many in a row are a lot less. Start with a £1 stake and if u lose £2 and so on.
What are the flaws in this? you would be very, very unlucky to lose 10 hands of blackjack in a row. |
|
By:
chatname: your flaw is that either
a) your chances aren't a lot less or b) The system doesn't pay out enough to cover your losses (i.e. they give you less than evens). One of those statements must be true or you'd be getting evens on a 'better than evens' punt. In which case you could make money long run just betting level stakes. |
|
By:
i lose 10 hands in a row at blackjack often.....
|
|
By:
My record is 27 losing blackjack hands in a row -- any higher offers?
|
|
By:
If anyone really wants to Martingale, try this variant. It works as well as "classic" Martingale (in as much as it doesn't work at all) but it does address the issue of needing and risking a large bankroll and hence reduces the likelihood of hitting the house limit.
Rather than betting on even-money options where Martingale requires you to double-up with every loss, bet on single numbers instead. You only need to increase your bet once for every 35 losses and even then only by one unit. e.g. Betting $1 on a single number will yield a loss of $35 after 35 losing spins, requiring the stake to increase to $2 in order to recoup the losses. 70 losing spins will require the stake to increase to $3, 105 losing spins is $4, etc. |
|
By:
Heeeere's Johnny - your staking plan is wrong. If on the 69th spin you win you will get $70 back but would have bet $35 for the 1st 35 spins and $68 for the next 34 spins = $103 in total. loss $33.
|
|
By:
Yep, $2 should read $3 and so on. My point really was that its a slower financial progression than classic Martingale. None of these things work anyway so its all a bit redundant really.
|
|
By:
what a joke this place has become
|
|
By:
I believe the Guiness Book of records, world record for red consecutively coming up is 27, so that would be £268,435,455 required to make £1 on that streak.
1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 16384 32768 65536 131072 262144 524288 1048576 2097152 4194304 8388608 16777216 33554432 67108864 134217728 |
|
By:
The best foolproof system is.......dont go there.
|
|
By:
Very nice post and your discussions i learnt a lot from your forum.......
|
|
By:
If your playing online just rub your screen and say "cmon baby make me rich" over and over again then bet on 17 rub the screen faster and it will come in
|
|
By:
Using the Martingale system is sheer stupidity, but if you do feel stupid don't, repeat don't stick to one colour F F S. I once toyed with randomising my outside bets using a die for every spin. 1 = 1 to 18 2 = ODD 3 = Red 4 = Black 5 = EVEN 6 = 19 to 36. If the die lands on it's edge put the maximum bet on ZERO :) You can't lose
|