Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 71 comments are related to the topic:
Quigg v Munroe

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 71
By:
carrie1187
When: 16 Jun 12 22:29
wat happens if u back munroe decision
By:
Steveirll
When: 16 Jun 12 22:30
you lose
By:
pauliow
When: 16 Jun 12 22:30
I layed Quigg so I winLaugh
By:
book
When: 16 Jun 12 22:30
i was up for 1200 on the draw,but put up a lay of 30 which got taken,but backed some more @ 22
By:
Steveirll
When: 16 Jun 12 22:30
because its a DRAW !!
By:
scarecrow
When: 16 Jun 12 22:30
sorry for rendall but i had a decent green on the draw at the time so it was good for me.
By:
carrie1187
When: 16 Jun 12 22:30
thats a joke shud b nocontest
By:
sj
When: 16 Jun 12 22:31
carrie1187     16 Jun 12 22:30 
thats a joke shud b nocontest

British board havent got a brain cell between them
By:
Kriskin
When: 16 Jun 12 22:31
I laid quigg but feel like I've cheated people who backed him.
By:
Norma Spoobs
When: 16 Jun 12 22:31
Help! does my lay of Quigg mean I've won?????
By:
pauliow
When: 16 Jun 12 22:31
I won but I agree that really sucks. Shocking decision imo
By:
pauliow
When: 16 Jun 12 22:32

Jun 16, 2012 -- 10:31PM, Norma Spoobs wrote:


Help! does my lay of Quigg mean I've won?????


Yes

By:
pauliow
When: 16 Jun 12 22:32
Market settled and closed
By:
carrie1187
When: 16 Jun 12 22:33
not happy.
By:
Norma Spoobs
When: 16 Jun 12 22:33
Wow I really won! I really that's right - what weird rules.
By:
Princes Purple Guitar
When: 16 Jun 12 22:33
SJ- was official result a no contest..or does technical draw become official...?
By:
Steveirll
When: 16 Jun 12 22:34
TD is official result
By:
Princes Purple Guitar
When: 16 Jun 12 22:35
fair enough...jesus his eye a mess
By:
scarecrow
When: 16 Jun 12 22:36
it was called as a technical draw by the compare when he announced the result.
By:
Peter Ridsdale
When: 16 Jun 12 22:50
Skybet refunded Munroe outright bet.
By:
Steveirll
When: 16 Jun 12 23:09
nice !! id say PP's would do the same  !

Is the Lee fight on sky sports early hours?
By:
bris1
When: 17 Jun 12 00:07
skybet didn't pay out on the draw though, they voided all bets
By:
Peter Ridsdale
When: 17 Jun 12 00:57
This fight was for the interim WBA World super bantamweight title, under WBA rules its a no decision. The WBA don't have a technical draw outcome in their rules.
By:
alabaster crashes down
When: 17 Jun 12 01:34
just back from this, what a disappointing night. Towers fight was farcical, Rhodes disappointing then just bad luck with the cut. Fair amount of mither in the crowd after aswell, Munroe fans at ringside charging across the cycle track and getting stuck into the Quigg followers in the stand...no need for it at all.
By:
bris1
When: 17 Jun 12 02:42
they just go on the 'official' decision though don't they
By:
Peter Ridsdale
When: 17 Jun 12 08:06
Here's the WBA's rules, they don't even have a Technical Draw as a ruling.

b) ACCIDENTAL BLOWS: If the referee sees, or after consulting with
the doctor he concludes that a boxer has been injured in an accidental
manner, and as a consequence of this wound, the boxer is not able to
continue the fight, he shall IMMEDIATELY notify the Local
Commission representatives, the fight supervisor who represents the
World Boxing Association, and the judges of the fight, that the fight has
ended.
Should under the same circumstances (intentional unfair blow), the fight
could be resumed the referee shall notified the above mentioned
persons that the wound was produced by an accidental blow, for if the
wound gets worse in subsequent rounds and the suspension of the fight
would be deemed necessary, the decision to call shall be as follows:

NO DECISION: In case that both boxers are in a draw in the judges
scorecards, or in case that no more than four (4) rounds have passed
at the time he stopped the fight.

TECHNICAL DECISION: In favor of the boxer that is in advantage in the judges’ scorecards.
By:
topweight
When: 17 Jun 12 09:19
I had a bet on munroe to win with PP. To my amazement they said that as the official result was a technical draw, that a draw is their official result as well. I have forwarded the WBA rule to their customer services and they are now reviewing wether to overturn their result to NOCONTEST. fingers crossed and a big thankyou to Peter Rid for posting the rule
By:
bris1
When: 17 Jun 12 11:31
I'm not denying what the rules say, just that bookies will pay out on whatever the official decision is, right or wrong, if they change it all those people on the draw will be straight to IBAS, it's no different to trying them to get the first Dawson vs Hopkins fight changed before the commission stepped in.
By:
Peter Ridsdale
When: 17 Jun 12 11:57
You can't just go making the rules up as you go, the truth of the matter is the people who were paid out on the draw were wrongly paid out. The official decision will be changed to a No Decision when the incompetence of the BBBoC who was also a WBA official has been addressed.
By:
book
When: 17 Jun 12 14:17
the decision was a technical draw,which is the correct settlement.
By:
alabaster crashes down
When: 17 Jun 12 16:38
any links to replays of this? Completely missed the punch that put rhodes down and wouldn't mind seeing the round where Towers was horizontal on the ropes again.
By:
bris1
When: 18 Jun 12 00:44
the bookies would be making it up if they settled on anything but the draw lol
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com