|
By:
Experts
![]() |
|
By:
lol
|
|
By:
I don't think he said it without significant irony, tbh
![]() |
|
By:
Miami should cover -12.5 but for me its deja vu.... I will not be surprised if they will start slow and let the bucks to build a medium lead. I have seen that all the season and in last year playoffs. So I will wait to get better odds in play for Heat to cover. Maybe 3.5-4,or higher, who knows :D
Or they will blowout the bucks from the beginning with authority, but i don't think so....will see. |
|
By:
I just looked it up in the thesaurus. He is right!
Expert Definition: knowledgeable, proficient, chaser, addict |
|
By:
Antonyms: morse, armchairidiot, dlarsson
|
|
By:
i always read this forum do not post very often and it is very entertaining.but reading the statmans posts i had to post.ancic reminds me of james willoughby on ruk with his speed figures.
|
|
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
21 Apr 13 23:33 Joined: 18 May 03 | Topic/replies: 38,571 | Blogger: Srichaphan or Ancic?'s blog I just looked it up in the thesaurus. He is right! Expert Definition: knowledgeable, proficient, chaser, addict ![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
at least you guys are cheering me up :)
|
|
By:
il be back at game time
|
|
By:
got some work to do for a cs module
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
nadal choked
|
|
By:
In the next day I want these bets
1.26 x 1, 1.15 x 2, 1.07 x 7, 1.04 x 1, 1.02 x 1, 1.01 x 9. Should be easy, no? |
|
By:
Well, I want to watch this game and I want to hae a bet, but as there's no decent bets than I can see, I'm having a small punt on the Bucks and I'll probably lay it off if they dare to get a few infront. This will lose, and as I know this in advance, I won't get angry about it
![]() |
|
By:
you should wait until it is a few mins in.
|
|
By:
I won't even mind if Miami blow them away, I really enjoy watching the Heat play.
|
|
By:
DJOKOVIC FRENCH OPEN NAP
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
no way would I put my bank on Miami.
|
|
By:
Although I am tempted by Cobresal in the football, at 2-0 up away and at 1.26. But the odds scare me, way too big.
|
|
By:
You want to go all in on those?
|
|
By:
No, hence I want bigger odds for a lesser stake and a trade out for 7%
|
|
By:
Gone for a lay of Huachipato to play safe. Watch them score 3 now.
|
|
By:
It's my favourite sport but I hate football betting. Goals are too random and so significant by virtue of their rarity that I mostly cannot bring myself to bet on it. I prefer tennis and basketball because the scoring is more continuous and more related to the performance of the players and teams.
|
|
By:
Colorado just one run up now :S
|
|
By:
Basketball, cricket are the markets on which I think it is easiest to get the big odds trades. Tennis, sometimes, but you have to take more risk. Football, nigh on impossible.
|
|
By:
Have I sent everyone to sleep?!
|
|
By:
do you have any stats for player performance
|
|
By:
no
|
|
By:
Arizona on two bases :S
|
|
By:
now all square :(
|
|
By:
now winning :(
|
|
By:
Colorado have thrown it away
![]() |
|
By:
SoA instead of backing 9 x 1.01, surely you can make 1% eg. in an overs football market in a match with a live stream (not slow tv pics) when the ball goes out of play or when there's a sub. Get in and out quickly, remove stake and make 1% (3-4% is quite easy). I really can't understand people who back 1.01. the only time i'd back it is if i can trade it at higher than 100 on the underdog.
|
|
By:
yes thats what I will do lurka.
|
|
By:
do u use trading software? it's easy enough with that
|
|
By:
no
|