P.Moody winning by a inch is enough.......Really?

Before FRANKEL Won by 11L

Firstly he said himself when interviewed that shes is going over there to race against B grade opposition and for a 1/3 of the prizemoney. So when anyone questions his mares ability they should think twice.. and got a bit heated and grumpy about it also.

So Peter is booming with confidence Comments like the Ratings are all wrong 3 horse races with pacemakers yada yada yada.

So basically he is taking her over there to show the world how good she is not the prizemoney factor, its never been about prizemoney otherwise he would race her in Australia not travel to overseas.. its always been about owning and training a once in a lifetime horses and proving that she is just that to the rest of the world.

After FRANKEL WON by 11L

Now he is saying where happy to just win by a inch and take home the prizemoney?

Frankel has clearly put him in his spot! Didn't Peter say that Frankels ratings are basically crap yada yada 3 horse races with a pacemaker yawn. But now Frankel is the best he P.Moody has ever seen? really Peter? took you a while!

To take her across the world and win by a inch length or 2L proves what?..... nothing! It would be a shame to see her held to the line IMO. To go all the way to Ascot and win by a inch imo is pathetic!! Totally proves nothing and when you do get a champion like BC a once in a lifetime horse you need to stamp her in the History books not duck and weave, questions and what people want to see and that's letting her burn up Ascot.

Shes a once in a lifetime horse and another one like her HE will never get...she was born a champion a Freak! let her prove it to the rest of the world and LET HER GO!......not comeback here and beat up on BUFFERING and LONE ROCK etc again and again and prove nothing.

Otherwise he will regret it later people will always talk rubbish she beat nothing only beat Hay List over and over Were Gonna Rock etc.

They flown all the way over there, taken a huge risk with the horse, and to win a 1/3 of the prizemoney they would in AUS by a inch would have him satisfied? Yeah right

And now he has said Frankel is the best he has ever seen... this really annoys me! reason is he trains the fastest horse Australia has ever seen according to many undefeated in 21 starts and winning her races under a massive grip most times..and just like that Frankel is the best?

I have said it always you can not compare horses from one era to another i don't care if they win by 6L every start 11L or 31L like Secretariat did ....it means absoulutly nothing to me its what you beat... not how far you beat them.

Secretariat goes down in History with the yanks as the best ever because of a 30L margin in a 4 horse field.. where he beat two horses that should not have even been in the race total walkers making up the field of 4 only....the only opposition he had that day ran a shocker on the day struggling vs the other two let alone vs Secretariat. Also to note Secretariat was beaten before that and after that ....So how can he be BEST EVER?

Three weeks after his win at Belmont, Secretariat shipped to Chicago, and easily won the Arlington Invitational at Arlington Park. He went to Saratoga, for the Whitney Stakes. Racing against older horses for the first time he was beaten by the Allen Jerkens-trained Onion, a four-year-old gelding. Onion led from the start and led Secretariat by a head on the final turn before pulling ahead in the straight to win by a length. A record crowd of over 30,000 witnessed what was described as an "astonishing" upset.[19] In September, Secretariat returned to Belmont for the 11⁄2 mile Woodward Stakes in which he was matched against the Allen Jerkens-trained, four-year-old Prove Out.  Secretariat led into the straight but was overtaken by Prove Out, who pulled clear to win by 41⁄2 lengths. BEST EVER? 31L win but gets flogged by others straight after? 

Margins mean nothing its the horses and pressure in the race at the time that see the best of the best crack under pressure... winning and beating horses of not the same caliber is fine viewing.... but winning and beating champions and having them crack chasing you is what real Champions do.

That's why i have also said Pacemakers are needed in racing and for all those that say there not they obviously don't appreciate champions like Frankel who if not for UK and Timeform ratings would never be let go, and instead would only get average Ratings 130 etc but with Ratings and pacemakers 130 Ratings don't looks as impressive as 147 does it. Hence why most to be stallions get pushed out to the line to secure a high Rating for their future Stud career.