We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
It's almost here Jez - better ramp up the scare campaign because it's all about to come crashing down, the sun will come up on July 1, just like it always has
![]() |
|
By:
We know that wombleoz - of course the sun will fkn rise on July 1.
We know the sky won't fall in. But again lets consider the facts: - For the first few years, we’ll have a carbon tax much higher than applies anywhere else in the world. - After that, it will either be too low to make the slightest difference or too high to achieve anything but send Australian jobs overseas. - Knowing the price is likely to fall will encourage business not to invest in expensive carbon-dioxide-cutting measures. - If the tax does fall, the gap between money raised and compensation spent will be disastrous. - And all this to achieve no cut in the world’s temperature You won't address the facts, wombleoz. You just spin your nonsense - you try and downplay the effects of this attack on our way of life. The sun will come up on 1 July, but families will be worse off, more jobs will go offshore, pensioners will struggle with rising power bills, singles will cough up more in rising rents.....fuel, groceries, school clothes....UP UP UP and UP. You know the fact's prove this carbon tax is a farce wombleoz, so your continue to spew this nonsense in one line format that the sky won't fall in......which isn't fkn rocket science. It won't fall in - but Australian's will be worse off and for what? NOTHING. NOTHING at all. This tax is an attack on our way of life - we didn't vote for it, but we'll all pay for it. |
|
By:
wait and see how it plays out Jez - sure the headline price is $23 dollars per tonne - when you take into account the free permits etc, the price is much lower
once Europe recovers from the GFC, once South Korea and others get up and trading the price will be what it will be - i.e. free market, subject to the floor price I thought Liberals supported the free market??? |
|
By:
Exactly,
Remember GST was having the same impact,Scare tactics. Jez is a lacky. Support the working families of Australia? By Selling Australia Jez? Cutting Medicare? Jez supports selling and privatizing Australia. Regards, Niccolo |
|
By:
Cutting Medicare?
I believe Labor will be cutting parts of Medicare tomorrow in the Budget. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Another blow to working families as they try to get ahead. |
|
By:
Correct. I posted a comment a few days ago where Hockey said Medicare was to be cut but the private health rebate remain because it's a good.
Who know's what impact it has on the Budget(Haven't read anything but I assume it will be tightlipped.) At the end of the day,We are 26th in the Developed on what we spend on Welfare and 6% our GDP. Yet that is unsustainable? Regards, Niccolo |
|
By:
apparently middle australia will be slaughtered in the budget.
sad days ahead. |
|
By:
"apparently"
You know that means right? Quote-Jez Punter "This tax is an attack on our way of life" And Selling Australia to private invetors isn't? Selling TAFE? Selling of power companies? Tell me what percent Gas and power has gone up since the Liberal's have become in power? Can you tell me why the Liberal Victorian Government would consider selling TAFE? Privatizing Australia,Is a good thing. Just ask America. Regards, Niccolo |
|
By:
Even here in Canberra, businesses won't be spared....
![]() ![]() ![]() We didn't vote for it, but we'll all pay for it. Carbon tax to squeeze businesses, group warns Rosslyn Beeby May 7, 2012 The Canberra Times Canberra's small businesses, which are ''already squeezed'' by increased costs, will be forced further into debt by the carbon tax, a national business industry group says. Small to Medium Enterprise Australia chief executive Dean Logan has warned many local businesses are likely to close, cut services or reduce staff numbers as a result of additional costs. ''I think little has been done by governments to prepare small businesses or involve them in the conversation,'' Mr Logan said. Australia's small businesses were already paying ''ten of thousands of dollars a year'' for environmental permits required to operate basic manufacturing equipment, such as plastic injection moulders, he said. But these businesses were being under-cut by cheap imports from countries that had less stringent environmental laws. Mr Logan said it was unfair to expect Australia's small to medium businesses to pay for greenhouse gas abatement while Chinese imports remained exempt from carbon tax charges. ''We are penalising our small businesses, but allowing cheaply-made, polluting products to dominate the market,'' he said. The ACT Greens environment spokesman Shane Rattenbury has also questioned whether enough has been done to prepare Canberra's business sector for carbon pricing, which takes effect on July 1. A carbon price, starting at $23 a tonne and rising to $29 by 2015, will affect consumers through increases in electricity and gas prices; building materials, such as steel, concrete and bricks; and other goods that are emissions intensive to produce. Low income households will be eligible for assistance, but federal figures show the carbon tax will collectively cost Canberra's mid to high income households more than $26.5 million. Mr Rattenbury said the ACT government had been ''too timid'' in setting targets for renewable energy uptake and lagged behind in adopting carbon neutral goals and programs to help our commercial sector cut emissions. A spokesman for ACT Environment Minister Simon Corbell said the government had met with members of the business community while drafting its second climate change action plan, Weathering the Change. He said issues raised were considered in developing the plan, to be released later this year. In a report to the government last year, consultants estimated Canberra's commercial building sector was its biggest source of greenhouse emissions. It said that, while energy price increases ''including due to carbon pricing'' would drive some energy efficiency improvement in commercial buildings, ''tenant light and power demand is determined by the businesses leasing floor space, and owners may receive little or no return in the short term on efficiency investments.'' It also warned the ACT could face a ''development drought'' if more stringent energy performance requirements were introduced through changes to building codes. ''The local property development and construction industry might be expected to oppose the additional costs associated with additional performance requirements, particularly if they were not accompanied by higher rental returns,'' it said. Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/act-news/carbon-tax-to-squeeze-businesses-group-warns-20120506-1y6yo.html#ixzz1uBD4nr6A |
|
By:
GST had the same affect.
And at least it isn't a tax on top of a tax. Regards, Niccolo |
|
By:
Tell me what percent Gas and power has gone up since the Liberal's have become in power in WA?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Now they want to sell the Victorian state. THIS GOVERNMENT IS A THREAT TO AUSTRALIA. Regards, Niccolo |
|
By:
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Jez,
Surplus all smokes and mirrors? You should apologize for that comment. Deceitful,Spin doctor who doesn't hold back,Who can give it but not take it. You cannot argue anything unless the Murdoch press has published a story on it. Notice on SkyNews(601) the two douche's were flustering their words,haha..Free speech? Yea Right. Poor big business,Yea we're really ticked off about that broken promise. 2.9Billion delayed,Hahaha..We should take care of overseas rather than our own,Why not? Look at the American ghettos and their overseas war advancements. Once again your credibility is called into question Regards, Niccolo |
|
By:
bills going up..........
and the climate hasnt changed ![]() |
|
By:
its bloody freezing down here SC
![]() |
|
By:
I wonder what happened to the bewildered homosexual Nicolo Machiavelli?
|
|
By:
climate still the same up here IMO
|
|
By:
but isn't your electricity dearer ?
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
oh yeah..........even though my consumption is down
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
thank you julia
![]() |
|
By:
I don't believe there has been a thread with so many responses..........wow
so the consensus is should we have a carbon tax? yes 548 no 3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
a wonderful job juliar..........NOT
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() history will not be kind to her methinks |
|
By:
derr secong
my tongue in cheek was @rse about but anyways the real consensus is should we have a carbon tax/ets? 5,583,215 46.55 - NO 6,411,134 53.45 - YES ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
derr secong
my tongue in cheek was @rse about but anyways the real consensus is should we have a carbon tax/ets? 5,583,215 46.55 - NO 6,411,134 53.45 - YES ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
twice to make sure
![]() |
|
By:
another beautiful spring day up here, the seasons all seem in check to me, so much for the dastardly invisible substance wrecking it all up
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() the loonies get their way its back to the ice age.......then they'll find another reason to rort you |
|
By:
Silly secong got the numbers ar$e about
should we have a carbon tax/ets? 5,583,215 46.55 - YES 6,411,134 53.45 - NO come on Electricity Bill respect the vote...... |
|
By:
more proof the carbon tax is working and should stay, or become an ETS
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/flat-emissions-result-masks-impact-of-carbon-tax-20131209-2z0mr.html |
|
By:
Now don’t be too hard on Poor ol bill … secong
![]() Remember he’s trying to read the news and he’s got the … Hard left, the left, the centre left, the middle left, the ‘just right of middle left’ and the ‘right of left’ comrades all pushing him this way and that … and on top of that poor ol bill has also got adam bandt on the phone telling him that … the nsw bushfires were an act of climate change … prompted by the coal that Australia dug up and sold to china who burned it for electricity/industry and pushed co2 emmissions into the atmosphere that turned around immediately and headed straight for the blue mountains … to cause Australia firefighters and citizens grief (and therefore a TAX will solve THAT problem and every similar problem in the future) .. and while poor ol bill is trying to listen to ... and comprehend the bizarre adam bandt … bill is thumbing through today’s newspaper … a non-murdoch paper mind you (just in case an ex-spy is watching and ready to blow the whistle on bill) ... but the paper still has … the same info … http://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/20228425/ground-full-of-bombs-nsw-bushfire-inquiry/ Recommendations for hazard reduction burning were ignored by the department of defence at a training ground where a botched explosives exercise started a bushfire which destroyed homes in the Blue Mountains. The exercise at the Marrangaroo Training Area near Lithgow set off unexploded ordnance on October 16 and grew into the massive fire that burned for more than a month, a commission of inquiry has heard. The inquiry on Monday heard details of explosives going off, endangering Defence firefighters, and embarrassingly inadequate preparation by the Defence Force. A Rural Fire Service investigation was satisfied the training exercise caused the fire, which became known as the State Mine fire. |
|
By:
funny stuff womble
Industries only partly covered by the carbon price, or not at all - such as agriculture, transport and fugitive emissions from gas and coal operations - are seeing rising emissions, nullifying the gains from electricity generators its costing over $26K per tonne abated.........and for what...miniscule effect |
|
By:
why it should be expanded to other industries as well Secong - especially gas and coal - a price on pollution, you know it makes sense
![]() when it comes to this stuff Thebas - there's only a small nub of people that aren't actually on Bill's side, e.g. sensible Liberals know a price is the best way to deal with it as well |
|
By:
price hasn't worked
when something has been tried and failed .. only the foolish or those with vested interested would wish to continue with a failure you know ... as well as anybody ... that a change ... and ONLY a change in the power source from the old is the way to defer the emmissions (i was taking the p!ss before i'm sure you realise) solar cannot provide the immensity of scale that industry would need, but is suitable in smaller scale operations (ie one home etc) as the power cannot be stored and must be generated as it is required wind will not drive industry but can be used on smaller scale operations as well these are happening now but taxing coal will not stop coal usage .. only allow vested interest to reap more dollars from a tax imposition at best ... citizens try and use less electricity and have done for a decade or so ... but the demands of new industry in emerging (not established) countries has increased the use of coal not diminished it at worst ... it is divisive with the using as much or not more than they ever did .. and the poor forced to wear and extra jumper or two as some silly economist once suggested thereby splitting the world EVEN FURTHER into the haves and have nots ffs .. exactly as the socialist articles i have provided you guys (who won't read any right wing links lol) have explained very clearly who came up with ... lets have a tax/trade system ... and lets give it to wall street to organise for us who presented that GEM at Kyoto and did they have a vested interest ![]() |
|
By:
^ with the affluent using as much or not more than they ever did
|
|
By:
good posting thebas
womble just doesn't get it, tax will never save the environment in actual fact the ETS/carbon tax scam kills people http://www.spectator.co.uk/the-week/leading-article/9088931/winter-fuel/ I know womble wont read the link so here's a snippet The 2003 heatwave was blamed for 2,000 deaths, and treated as a national emergency. Sir David King, then chief scientific officer, declared that this meant climate change was ‘more serious even than the threat of terrorism’. Since then, some 280,000 Brits have died from the cold and barely 10,000 from the heat. We have been focusing on the wrong enemy. |
|
By:
ffs Secong - there are more extreme weather events happening - it's not just about getting hotter
Thebas - the price is working - look at the figures, especially with electricity - emissions are down around 8% |
|
By:
FFS womble what extreme weather events are happening more than normal? prove it
I read somewhere since Katrina in the US of A the frequence of hurricanes is way down..... these things have been going on for millions repeat millions of years....cycles a price on carbon doesn't make a flysh!t of difference..... you watermelons just don't get it..........the biggest con of all time |
|
By:
it's the SUN that drives climate change....FFS
|
|
By:
ffs womble
![]() Thebas - the price is working - look at the figures, especially with electricity - emissions are down around 8% ... those were the same figures you quoted 6 weeks after gillard introduced her fake for the environment co2 tax when Combet got up in Parliament saying the same thing ... and if emmissions are down 8% we can all relax ... 5% was the target labor agreed on ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
unfortunately emissions from power are only part of the picture - they are down overall but only marginally because the tax wasn't broad enough
look global Secong, how many people have died in weather events the last 10 years compared to the previous 10 for example??? meantime while we pull back China ramps up http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-11/guangdong-to-start-carbon-auction-with-china-s-highest-price.html |
|
By:
a pilot project effectively moving money from region to region within china
![]() 350 million tons are capped ... but ONLY 3% of that will actually be auctioned for money = 10.5 million tons China produced 6,200m tonnes of CO2 ... last year alone but the pilot plan should shake off the impression that china is doing - nothing ![]() Ninety-seven percent of the permits will be distributed free before Dec 10, and 3 percent will be auctioned at Guangzhou-based China Emissions Exchange in mid-December with an opening price of 60 yuan ($9.85) per metric ton. These users can get free permits from the government to cover their expected emissions. But when they exceed those emissions they are required to buy permits in the market from companies having a surplus, or from offset projects elsewhere in China. http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2013-11/28/content_17136355.htm ... what gets emmitted in china ... stays in china ... except the the actual co2 that is ![]() |