Your Competitions
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Show More
table prob AM - having a bit of trouble with my workbook at present
Kohoutek
Mapledurham - 5.00 Southwell
Hale-Bopp
Aleen - 4.30 Southwell
Tempel
Nocte Volatus - 1.45 Warwick
Halley
Rangatira Jack - 1.35 Wincanton
Levy
Causing Problems - 12.10 Lingfield
Belyavsky
Worlington - 12.45 Lingfield
Thanks Reged
Mapledurham - 5.00 Southwell
Hale-Bopp
Aleen - 4.30 Southwell
Tempel
Nocte Volatus - 1.45 Warwick
Halley
Rangatira Jack - 1.35 Wincanton
Levy
Causing Problems - 12.10 Lingfield
Belyavsky
Worlington - 12.45 Lingfield
Thanks Reged
| POS | CHG | FORM | NAME | SELECTION | RESULT | +/- | TOTAL | ||
| 1▲ | 33d2002 | Kohoutek (3) | Onewaywest - 1.25 Warw | 1st 11/4 | 2.75 | £13.39 | |||
| 2▲ | 31d3022 | Levy (2) | Too Darn Good - 7.10 Kemp | Lost | -1.00 | £4.94 | |||
| 3▲ | 3000-d1 | Da Special 1 (5) | Lily Parr - 5.25 Dund | Lost | -1.00 | £2.16 | |||
| 4▲ | +1 | dd0d-01 | the dealer (3) | Raging Raj - 4.40 Kemp | 1st 4/5 | 0.80 | £2.05 | ||
| 5▲ | -1 | 0300121 | DeSSieReborn | Everylittlestep - 3.55 Dund | Lost | -1.00 | £1.32 | ||
| 6 | 33n2211 | adamanty | Dig Deep - 2.00 Warw | 2nd | -1.00 | -£2.52 | |||
| 7 | +1 | ddd2-dd | Bumpertojumper (5) | Chuggy - 2.35 Warw | 1st 11/10 | 1.10 | -£3.40 | ||
| 8 | -1 | 3321-00 | Treesome | El Bandido Pancho - 2.45 Ffos | 2nd | -1.00 | -£3.97 | ||
| 9 | 32dd322 | Tempel (2) | Getaway Theatre - 3.10 Warw | 2nd | -1.00 | -£6.00 | |||
| 10 | 3012-0n | halcyon days | Dromlac Jury - 3.40 Warw | Lost | -1.00 | -£7.50 | |||
| 11 | +5 | 20ddn02 | Halley (1) | Sparkling Duke - 2.45 Ffos | 1st 9/2 | 4.50 | -£7.75 | ||
| 12 | -1 | 0000-30 | imlac (2) | No Selection | 0.00 | -£8.00 | |||
| 13 | -1 | d101032 | ISAAC2000 (2) | Invalid selection | -1.00 | -£10.33 | |||
| 14 | -1 | 0030020 | tictacman1 | Albus Anne - 4.05 Kemp | Lost | -1.00 | -£11.00 | ||
| 14 | -1 | 0002-03 | barstool | Dromlac Jury - 3.40 Warw | Lost | -1.00 | -£11.00 | ||
| 16 | -1 | 20d2001 | Hale-Bopp (1) | Kiss My Face - 3.10 Warw | Lost | -1.00 | -£11.92 | ||
| 17 | 0000-00 | gotitwrong- | No starting post | Lost | -1.00 | -£16.00 | |||
| 17 | 0000-00 | hulk23 | No starting post | Lost | -1.00 | -£16.00 | |||
| 17 | 0000-00 | JayRogers | No starting post | Lost | -1.00 | -£16.00 | |||
| 20 | 0000003 | top2rated (2) | No Selection | 0.00 | -£16.00 | ||||
| 21 | -1 | 00dd002 | Belyavsky (1) | Beckon - 5.10 Kemp | Lost | -1.00 | -£17.00 |
Unable to post? Send your nap to napscomp@gmail.com Please ensure you put the DIVISION in the Subject line and napster name on top of the selection!!!!
.
Finally, with much help from supreme settler KC, a table. Any problems - shout!
Top man was Halley with Sparkling Duke at 9/2,
which raced him up to 11th. His stablemate and our leader Kohoutek added an 11/4 to his treasure trove. 
An 11/10 nudged Bumpertojumper up to seventh
and even an odds-on was able to edge the dealer up to fourth.
Best of luck Thursday.
Finally, with much help from supreme settler KC, a table. Any problems - shout!
Top man was Halley with Sparkling Duke at 9/2,
which raced him up to 11th. His stablemate and our leader Kohoutek added an 11/4 to his treasure trove. An 11/10 nudged Bumpertojumper up to seventh
and even an odds-on was able to edge the dealer up to fourth. Best of luck Thursday.
REG
why was ISAAC2000 an invalid selection - the meeting was abandoned?
why was ISAAC2000 an invalid selection - the meeting was abandoned?
because my dear fiery one, I have to be fair to everyone and, although I am sure your post was a genuine mistake, it was known the night before there was to be an inspection at 8am, and your post was 8.01 am. It is up to napsters to ensure they have a nailed-on runner at the time of posting and I don't think it would have been possible to say that about this selection at that time.
that is totally crazy reg and frankly unacceptable.
i spoke to issac2000 (My son) re his choice which as you say was made in in total good faith not knowing the meeting was in question.
he retires from the competition as a result of that unworthy and quite appalling decsion
i spoke to issac2000 (My son) re his choice which as you say was made in in total good faith not knowing the meeting was in question.
he retires from the competition as a result of that unworthy and quite appalling decsion
not unworthy at all. ASs I say I'm sure the post was legit but it would be easy for someone to take advantage of the situation to sneak an extra point and, as I say, I have to be fair to everyone. swifty fell foul of the same ruling. Sorry if you feel differently but from my perspective, not at all unworthy or appalling, just fair. And may I add tbat I think it's a bit rich you casting slurs on my work when I do this, day effing in, day effing out for zero reward other than the enjoyment of my fellow napsters. Its you last comment that is "unworthy and quite appalling". 
Not unacceptable at all. As I said, I am sure in ISAAC2000's mind it was legit, but it would be easy for someone to take advantage of such a situation to sneak an extra point and I can't spend my time judging if the post is a genuine mistake or not. Likewise, we have to judge if non-runners are genuine or someone might have posted after it was decared. I have to be seen to be as fair as I can to all. To me that is what this was - fair to all. And I will add that, like the other settlers, I do this thing day effing in, day effing out, for no reward other than the enjoyment of my fellow napeters. So I can do without your outrageous attack on me. I certainly find that "unworthy and quite appalling".
Of course, alternatively you could volunteer to do it yourself if you think you'd be so much better at it. I'd quite happily walk away - I've got plenty on my plate besides this.
Popped my nose in for a rare looksee
See if the division would fold some time
Pedantic as per reg
Who mid month wants a 1 pt freebie
Not the Prem ffs
Who spends time checking inspection times
"It is up to napsters to ensure they have a nailed-on runner at the time of posting"
Never seen this rule apart from in your head
Lost a competitor now
But ... does it matter when 6 are allowed from a fellow settler
Thats a rule that should be enforced
1 poster name - 1 selection
Take out half the entries
See if the division would fold some time
Pedantic as per reg
Who mid month wants a 1 pt freebie
Not the Prem ffs
Who spends time checking inspection times
"It is up to napsters to ensure they have a nailed-on runner at the time of posting"
Never seen this rule apart from in your head
Lost a competitor now
But ... does it matter when 6 are allowed from a fellow settler
Thats a rule that should be enforced
1 poster name - 1 selection
Take out half the entries
well I'd excpect that kind of naff comment from you 
Cant wait to see us fail eh?
Cant wait to see us fail eh?
Reg, There was no intention to offend you or cast dispurtions on the fantastic work you do. If i offended you i apologise unreserdvley and i have always enjoyed your narrative in the comp. I think you and all the others do an amazing and fantastic job.
I still think the decsion to be unjust and harsh and maybe we agree to disagrre over that. Again please accept my apologies and i am truly sorry if i offended you in any way
I still think the decsion to be unjust and harsh and maybe we agree to disagrre over that. Again please accept my apologies and i am truly sorry if i offended you in any way
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539