Just to make it perfectly clear to everyone so you can't say 'Lou you backed Matt and Rebecca won so you lost ha ha ' type of thing, or next year when we're all discussing the various threads you can't say the same.
I'M HEREBY CONFIRMING THAT I HAVE BACKED REBECCA AT 5.8 HAVING LAYED HER AT 4.53 SO THAT IF SHE WINS SHE BECOMES A 'TAKER'. FOR THOSE NOT IN THE KNOW THAT MEANS I END UP LEVEL IF SHE WINS, DON'T WIN/DON'T LOSE.
I don't THINK she will win it as I think Matt's an easy winner myself but rather than end up losing almost £1900 I've backed her back as I think she's Matt's nearest challenger.
DON'T SAY I NEVER SAID AS YOU CAN ALL CLEARLY READ THIS NOW. It's ridiculous I have to do this as I'm nothing less than totally honest but just in case, I've told you anyway.
It's not 'Clown' it's having top prove to people such as yourself the bets I've had. I've posted others before and can do the same on every single bet if need be. I hope most anyway take me for my word.
GeorgeIt's not 'Clown' it's having top prove to people such as yourself the bets I've had. I've posted others before and can do the same on every single bet if need be. I hope most anyway take me for my word.
Chill Lou, you are having second thoughts re Matt/Rebecca and arranging your book accordingly. That's what people do on here. No need to personalise/internalise all this.
I have said I think Rebecca will win but if she doesn't who gives a flying fck?
Chill Lou, you are having second thoughts re Matt/Rebecca and arranging your book accordingly. That's what people do on here. No need to personalise/internalise all this.I have said I think Rebecca will win but if she doesn't who gives a flying fck?
Yes I could probably lay Matt now and guarantee (hang on I'll put a 'test' bet in) ROUGHLY about an £850 profit regardless of who wins but I'm reluctant to do that as I THINK he's the winner.
alfieYes I could probably lay Matt now and guarantee (hang on I'll put a 'test' bet in) ROUGHLY about an £850 profit regardless of who wins but I'm reluctant to do that as I THINK he's the winner.
If I announced on here every time I backed or layed someone there would be about 200 threads on this series alone.
What a sad little friendless turd you are Lou!
If I announced on here every time I backed or layed someone there would be about 200 threads on this series alone.What a sad little friendless turd you are Lou!
Because if I don't certain people on here who have doubted me before (till I made them all look stupid when I posted my bets - that soon shut them up) will say "Lou you done your dough because Rebecca won' (if she did of course) so this way I'm clearly telling everyone on here that I HAVE BACKED REBECCA TOO TO GET MY MONEY BACK.
That's why.
George BaileyBecause if I don't certain people on here who have doubted me before (till I made them all look stupid when I posted my bets - that soon shut them up) will say "Lou you done your dough because Rebecca won' (if she did of course) so this
Yep they queue up when it's me but they STILL can't beat me. If I keep being honest how can they trip me up. Tell lies and you're in trouble. I deal in FACTS and have the figures to prove it.
"Next"
GeorgeYep they queue up when it's me but they STILL can't beat me. If I keep being honest how can they trip me up. Tell lies and you're in trouble. I deal in FACTS and have the figures to prove it."Next"
Lou I think you are wrong that people on here would have a pop if Matt lost. Firstly many would be licking their own wounds too much and secondly because you took position which didn't pay off; so what.
The irony is that by now backing Rebecca NOT for sound book balancing reasons but just to prevent the remote possibility of getting some stick on here actually feeds the beast.
Lou I think you are wrong that people on here would have a pop if Matt lost. Firstly many would be licking their own wounds too much and secondly because you took position which didn't pay off; so what.The irony is that by now backing Rebecca NOT for
No there are a good few on here that don't like the fact I keep tipping the winner at the start. They're dying to see me trip up and who have I clearly backed as my 'winner' this year ............. Matt. They know it and I know and they're all jealous.
The difference is if Matt doesn't win it (don't forget I could green up all round now for a £900 profit if i wanted) I will gladly come on here and admit i was wrong and lost my money /came out level if Rebecca won. Let's see if they do the same to me if Matt wins. I won't hold my breath.
GeorgeNo there are a good few on here that don't like the fact I keep tipping the winner at the start. They're dying to see me trip up and who have I clearly backed as my 'winner' this year ............. Matt. They know it and I know and they're al
Of course 99% on here couldn't give a shyte who I've backed but the 1% who would rub my nose in it I'm CLEARLY TELLING I'VE BACKED REBECCA TO GET ME EVN.
CufmosOf course 99% on here couldn't give a shyte who I've backed but the 1% who would rub my nose in it I'm CLEARLY TELLING I'VE BACKED REBECCA TO GET ME EVN.
GTL if it was a deliberate wind up there would only be 5 responses.
Lou, what's to stop someone coming on here if matt wins to say "na na na na na you would have won more if you hadn't greened up on rebecca"?
GTL if it was a deliberate wind up there would only be 5 responses.Lou, what's to stop someone coming on here if matt wins to say "na na na na na you would have won more if you hadn't greened up on rebecca"?
LOU I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE POSTED BECAUSE I HAVE BLOCKED YOU BUT I AM SURE KNOWING YOU ARE SUCH A MASSIVE MUG IT IS PURE NONSENSE/AFTERTIMING/OR PLAIN B0LLOCKS OR A COMBINATION OF ALL THREE
LOU I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU HAVE POSTED BECAUSE I HAVE BLOCKED YOU BUT I AM SURE KNOWING YOU ARE SUCH A MASSIVE MUG IT IS PURE NONSENSE/AFTERTIMING/OR PLAIN B0LLOCKS OR A COMBINATION OF ALL THREE
I was just saying what a good tipster you were and intelligent human being. We all like a compliment so shame you can't read it. Oh well I tried.
HORSEPLACINGI was just saying what a good tipster you were and intelligent human being. We all like a compliment so shame you can't read it. Oh well I tried.
Yes any thread with me 'starring' in is always very popular. I'm the Jack Lemmon' of the forum!
Roll up, Roll up!
"Gone Fishing" ...........bub bub bub bub bub bub. Aah Old Bing. He never sang a bad song you know.
George Yes any thread with me 'starring' in is always very popular. I'm the Jack Lemmon' of the forum!Roll up, Roll up!"Gone Fishing" ...........bub bub bub bub bub bub. Aah Old Bing. He never sang a bad song you know.
George Bailey Joined: 04 Apr 10 Replies: 2132 29 Nov 10 16:47 Lou I think you are wrong that people on here would have a pop if Matt lost. Firstly many would be licking their own wounds too much and secondly because you took position which didn't pay off; so what.
The irony is that by now backing Rebecca NOT for sound book balancing reasons but just to prevent the remote possibility of getting some stick on here actually feeds the beast.
Surely the forum would have had more respect if Lou had let his bets run and stuck by his guns? Now his rabid promotion of Matt and denigration of Rebecca looks like ramping to push Rebecca out to a price where she was worth backing.
George Bailey Joined: 04 Apr 10Replies: 2132 29 Nov 10 16:47 Lou I think you are wrong that people on here would have a pop if Matt lost. Firstly many would be licking their own wounds too much and secondly because you took position which didn't pay
Hardly. Just putting enough on her to cover myself in case Matt doesn't win. In all honesty I think I've gave away £300 odd of my 'winnings' but worth it just in case.
bunnyHardly. Just putting enough on her to cover myself in case Matt doesn't win. In all honesty I think I've gave away £300 odd of my 'winnings' but worth it just in case.
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B Joined: 06 Aug 02 Replies: 3337 Yes any thread with me 'starring' in is always very popular. I'm the Jack Lemmon' of the forum!
Lou - couldn't agree with more (as long as you lose the word 'Jack').
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B Joined: 06 Aug 02Replies: 3337 Yes any thread with me 'starring' in is always very popular. I'm the Jack Lemmon' of the forum!Lou - couldn't agree with more (as long as you lose the word 'Jack').
As with the others i've blocked I'll add you to te list so when you ask me something don't think I'm ignoring you I just can't see what you've wrote. Why am I doing this? Well look what you've called me below/above how ever you have the screen set up. Do you blame me. Would you still 'talk' with someone/ be their 'friend' type of thing if they said that to you? Well then that's why.
Good luck with your bets/
Laughing gravyAs with the others i've blocked I'll add you to te list so when you ask me something don't think I'm ignoring you I just can't see what you've wrote. Why am I doing this? Well look what you've called me below/above how ever you have t
Lou: So nobody is any doubt about this whatsoever.
You are a complete and utter w@nker who is like a sad man possessed over a sh1tty talent show. No one gives a flying monkeys what or who you have bet. You are indeed a PATHETIC ATTENTION SEEKING SADDO with fck all better to do in his empty life. You manage to be tedious, boring, derranged, deluded and obnoxious the the same time. Some achievement. Well done.
HTH clarifying the situation.
Lou: So nobody is any doubt about this whatsoever. You are a complete and utter w@nker who is like a sad man possessed over a sh1tty talent show. No one gives a flying monkeys what or who you have bet. You are indeed a PATHETIC ATTENTION SEEKING SADD
I really do laugh out loud at all the venom directed at Lou, excellent entertainment.
But shouldn't gamblers be more calm, objective and dispassionate? (I'm not saying I am, I'm hopeless, but at least I know what to aim for).
I really do laugh out loud at all the venom directed at Lou, excellent entertainment.But shouldn't gamblers be more calm, objective and dispassionate? (I'm not saying I am, I'm hopeless, but at least I know what to aim for).
You can see why I block them. Am I really so bad to be spoken to like that. I might think black, someone else white but I'll never say 'you silly fcuker' or 'you idiot, 'you're a lemmon' 'you're a to55er' etc. I think that's terrible and just don't put up with it.
Find me something where I've been rude, nasty in return and you'll find I receive it 1000 times over. Fair? ............ no and I won't put up with it. It's nice to converse with other decent folk here of which there ares some so that's nice.
HenryYou can see why I block them. Am I really so bad to be spoken to like that. I might think black, someone else white but I'll never say 'you silly fcuker' or 'you idiot, 'you're a lemmon' 'you're a to55er' etc. I think that's terrible and just
When all that matters in your world is a forum on a betting site about a crappy talent contest then such words cut deep. Even a sharpened watermelon can be a lethal weapon [;)]
When all that matters in your world is a forum on a betting site about a crappy talent contest then such words cut deep. Even a sharpened watermelon can be a lethal weapon
this thread is literally incredible - the most self absorbed, indulgent, un self aware, superfluous pile of drivel i have ever read. it's worse than martin amis ffs. lou, bless you, you have excelled yourself. it really is all about you isnt it
this thread is literally incredible - the most self absorbed, indulgent, un self aware, superfluous pile of drivel i have ever read. it's worse than martin amis ffs. lou, bless you, you have excelled yourself. it really is all about you isnt it
you know who lou reminds me of - chris eubank.....
not sure why....
best eubank moment - an interviewer says 'chris, are you a man of ethics'
'no' says chris, 'i am a man of sussexth'
you know who lou reminds me of - chris eubank.....not sure why....best eubank moment - an interviewer says 'chris, are you a man of ethics''no' says chris, 'i am a man of sussexth'