Forums

X Factor 2010

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 56 comments are related to the topic:
google search results

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 56
By:
Helmuthian Folds
When: 25 Nov 10 00:48
LG,

matt  cardle coke head
matt cardle photo with spliff in mouth
matt cardle dumps girlfriend on orders
matt cardle tries to get off with backing dancer having got back with afore mentioned girlfiend
Matt Cardle slags off peoples champ Wagner

And there have been more, may not have a grandma whose a a prostitute but there has been a steady drip drip drip of negative 'smaller' stories.
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 25 Nov 10 08:20
How many google hits would the Burke have had?  Fook all frankly

I remember people saying how poorly Joe was rating on these measures last year too LG
By:
laughing gravy
When: 25 Nov 10 08:55
Good morning HF & GB
The points you make are both taken and well made.
I really have no axe to grind here and my point is a more general one. If Rebecca had received 6.5 million more Google searches than OD then I suspect her backers on here would have been trumpeting the fact on the forum and it would have been used as evidence of her widespread popularity. However, because the situation is anything but it seems that many forumites are doing what we all do when we are presented with evidence that is discordant with our 'world view' namely, disclaiming the relevance of of that evidence.
It's called cognitive dissonance.
Don't get me wrong, Rebecca might hose up and she might be Simon's chosen one, but if I were a Rebecca backer (and I repeat I have her as a green) then I hope I would try to do what HF (to be fair) has sought to do and explain Rebecca's lack of Google searches rather than dissing the 'research'.

Best Regards
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 25 Nov 10 10:02
laughing

That's what I've always said.  See a poll/ search, story where someone looks good and it gets mentioned however when it's a negative it's cough cough let's sweep that under the carpet type thing. It's called "cognitive dissonance" apparently.  You're far more cleverer than me laughing!
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 25 Nov 10 10:05
Merely suggesting that these things are particularly useless LG.

I have no particular Rebecca axe to grind, Matt is my biggest green
By:
Henry VIII
When: 25 Nov 10 10:11
Polkoi you need to be more discriminating, "one" and "direction" are common words in English.

one direction x factor      6,960,000 results

"one direction" x factor    1,640,000 results
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 25 Nov 10 10:13
Rebecca

About 57,100,000 results (0.07 seconds)

[;)]
By:
Helmuthian Folds
When: 25 Nov 10 10:13
LG,

Also think you are being slightly unfair to figgy as well. 

His twitter stats at no real point have suggested that Rebecca will win and yet he pushes them forward every week.

We all have our favourites and we all have our books and not everyone will have their favourite as their biggest green.  As an example Wagner is easily my biggest green and even then I don't want him to win! [smiley:crazy]
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 25 Nov 10 10:14
Matt

About 136,000,000 results (0.07 seconds)
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 25 Nov 10 10:18
[>o]
By:
laughing gravy
When: 25 Nov 10 10:30
HF
Please don't think I am knocking Five Leaves' Twitter stats. They have been brilliant and I'm sure are more relevant than this Google search stuff. However, my basic point still stands. Namely, despite the heroic attempts to justify why Rebecca has 6.5 million less Google searches than One Direction it is an alrming difference and makes me question whether she is 'the word on the streets' and the act people are talking about.
Best Wishes
By:
Helmuthian Folds
When: 25 Nov 10 10:34
LG,

I understand your point and you are one person on here I always listen to!
By:
Henry VIII
When: 25 Nov 10 10:37
Rebecca has 6.5 million less Google searches

Completely wrong. Read my post.
By:
Helmuthian Folds
When: 25 Nov 10 10:38
Very good point Henry Blush
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 25 Nov 10 10:39
Where are these heroic attempts LG?   All I see is a thread full of mild p1sstaking Grin
By:
five leaves left
When: 25 Nov 10 11:27
Same here...and polkoi is no shrinking violet so well up to fighting his corner.

As for stats, they didn't surprise me at all.
It's only telling us who are the most newsworthy atm.

Slagging fellow contestants and  judges off, or jumping into bed with them, or crying every week and acting like a drama queen, etc, etc, is what makes headlines and Rebecca does none of that.

I'm surprised she's even above Mary on the bare stats, as Mary has had quite a few dramas herself.

The ones that did surprise me were 1D. They don't create alot of drama either.
I guess with teenage girls having insatiable appetites for the latest heartthrobs 'stories' pop up to fill their constant demand for the latest tittle tattle.
Though it seems from Henry that the initial figure was actually wrong and it looks nearer what I'd have expected now.
By:
polkoi
When: 25 Nov 10 13:05
My thread has been hijacked Cry


No problem  though, i only done it because i was bored.  Laugh


Henry ,i take your point on the one direction point, ta.

If there is something to take from these figures it is the suprisingly high figure of Matts

Of course he has had a few stories in the press about this and that, but no where near the amount as Cher or Katie.
rebeccas is dismally low and shows that she is just not news worthy.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com