|
By:
We can argue all day chaps/ladies. We'll have to wait and see. Potatoes/potartoes. I'm happy with my Matt bet, he's done well every week and is in with a fair shout. We're not even half way yet so I can only hope he keeps it up.
|
|
By:
Lou,what you say is very true,i do sense a softening in your attitude though.
|
|
By:
Denman
I notice you start threads, add to threads all making/sounding Matt not look good. Why is is ok for you to do it but then when I reply or start a thread in response it's not ok .... I'm deemed according to you worried/panicking? Kettle, black, pot? |
|
By:
Lou,i think your response confirms my point.
|
|
By:
Denman
Ok you're right ............................ but can you answer my question? |
|
By:
I think you have been far more demeaning about Rebecca than i have been about Matt,i think he is good,just not as good,but as you have said many times its all about opinions.
|
|
By:
Mine being as good as yours Denman?
|
|
By:
Allegedly[;)]
|
|
By:
;)
|
|
By:
Oh I'm sure yours isn't THAT bad.
Do you think in the betting they should be the other way round .......... ie rebecca in your opinion the better of the two? I'm all in on Matt at 5.15 so I'm doing ok but I would HONESTLY make him favourite would you if so why if Rebecca's the better of the two? |
|
By:
being "the better of the two" is not necessarily the equivalent of "most likely to win".
hope this helps.... |
|
By:
Denman
You have been answering in about three or four minutes as a rule but now 15 have gone by all of a sudden. Avoiding the question? hmmmm |
|
By:
Am i on the clock now??...i think the market is about right but as you said,long way to go.
|
|
By:
Oh right
Thanks |