Forums

World Cup 2014

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
pleasedontgetinjuredclanroyal
07 Jul 14 15:14
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Mar 04
| Topic/replies: 563 | Blogger: pleasedontgetinjuredclanroyal's blog
betfair settling as dead heat as both algeria and nigeria knocked out at same stage but  some bookies paying out on algeria.anyone know why ?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 8
By:
hello :-)
When: 07 Jul 14 15:58
Im not sure , maybe dead heat rules on performance basis ?
By:
Whatoddswouldyoulike
When: 07 Jul 14 18:52
I've no idea why any bookmaker would pay out in full on either of these teams, as it's quite clearly a 2-way tie where dead heat rules should apply.

By "some bookies", do you mean one particular bookmaker?
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 07 Jul 14 19:55
At least one bookie stipulated that if two teams got eliminated at the same stage it would come down to group points then goal difference.  Algeria had the better goal difference.
By:
pleasedontgetinjuredclanroyal
When: 07 Jul 14 22:26
ladcrooks,paddy shower,not ok corrals + nobetfred all paying on algeria...betway,betbright + Winner all paying on dead heat.

rung ladcrooks before tournament to clarify but after 3 phone calls was told was team that progressed furthest,no mention of

goal difference or points in group. not complaining as backed algeria but would have been gutted if on nigeria and told was

a loser.
By:
Whatoddswouldyoulike
When: 08 Jul 14 12:46
I backed Algeria at 14/1 with Betway, as those were the best odds at the time.

In hindsight it seems that I would have been better off taking worse odds with one of the bookies that adapts the rules in-play to suit its own financial interests.

You couldn't make it up.
By:
Charlton2005
When: 08 Jul 14 19:54
Whatoddswouldyoulike
08 Jul 14 12:46
Joined:
14 Nov 03
| Topic/replies: 51 | Blogger: Whatoddswouldyoulike's blog
I backed Algeria at 14/1 with Betway, as those were the best odds at the time.

In hindsight it seems that I would have been better off taking worse odds with one of the bookies that adapts the rules in-play to suit its own financial interests.

You couldn't make it up.


isnt what you just said equivalent to saying you would have been better off taking 3/1 a place than 12/1 a win about a horse that you know came 2nd?
By:
Whatoddswouldyoulike
When: 08 Jul 14 23:29
No, it's a completely different set of circumstances.

I was referring to the irony of a situation resulting from bookmakers not explaining their rules and therefore being able to make them up as they go along, should they choose to do so.

I have complete control over a decision to back a horse to win or to finish in the places; I have no control at all over decisions made by various bookmakers that were never explained in their betting rules.
By:
Charlton2005
When: 08 Jul 14 23:34
understood!

I can't believe they can make up the rules as they go along, but if people don't enquire then maybe they can 

Sad
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com