U.S. Horse Racing
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
AQU R1
4 at 1.7. Should suit the 70yd cutback in trip and handle the mud well. 2 is a danger, but think it has fitness doubts. I think 1 will improve on the mud, but it was beaten by the 4 by 10 lengths last time out, so will take something special to beat the 4 today.
4 at 1.7. Should suit the 70yd cutback in trip and handle the mud well. 2 is a danger, but think it has fitness doubts. I think 1 will improve on the mud, but it was beaten by the 4 by 10 lengths last time out, so will take something special to beat the 4 today.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 198
|
By:
AQU R2
3 at 1.37. Class drop could be a negative, but if this is fit, it's hard to see it getting beat. |
|
By:
evening, not sure i can repeat last night's fortunes but will try a few. 3 is very short at aq r2, it's the class dropper i suppose
|
|
By:
Hi mate! It won't take a lot for the 3 to win at all. Even if it's half fit, it should do the job. It can beat, but then, you can afford to lose 27% of 1.37 shots (ignoring commission).
I feel pathetic saying this, but I was so close to backing the 1 at 17.5 in the first at Aqueduct, but couldn't bring myself to do it with it having been beaten by 10 lengths by the 4 on a fast track last time out. Just shows how much difference a different a muddy track can make. |
|
By:
TAM R2
3 at 3.7. Recent 5f workouts indicate this is ready. Oh yeah, let's hope you can repeat last night's fortunes! |
|
By:
yeah, i took the 4 on at aq r1, was just such a cheap lay, will try this one too
|
|
By:
Well done in the first at AQU. Good luck.
|
|
By:
3 won, makes sense, not too sorry about that one
|
|
By:
not sure about tam, have laid the 3 but not one of my confident ones, we'll see.
|
|
By:
3 definitely has a good chance of getting beat, but I see value at 3.9. Mainly because I think it's fit on the basis of its recent workouts.
|
|
By:
4 made it look easy!
|
|
By:
Good call. You nailed that.
|
|
By:
thanks, laying the 6 at aq r3, gl
|
|
By:
AQU
4 at 2.96 to go wire to wire for a 3rd consecutive time. Has a good early pace edge. |
|
By:
I probably agree with your lay of the 6. Bruce Levine has a good record 60 day layoffs, but it may be telling that the 6 was disappointing last time out, and Levine has put the 6 back up for sale at the same price he claimed it at in the last race.
|
|
By:
TAM R3
3 at 3.5. Wire to wire. Long layoff, but think this is fit. |
|
By:
Another comfortable lay for you. I feared the worst for the 4 when it failed to get the lead.
|
|
By:
tam r3, laid the 3 - the layoff is the question
|
|
By:
Good call. 3 looked unfit. I was swayed by the workouts.
|
|
By:
aq 4, laid the 9, gl
|
|
By:
HAW R1
3 at 1.74. Think this has the edge over the 5 with the step up in trip. |
|
By:
AQU R4
3 at 7.4. Expensive Dutrow newcommer against horses that haven't proven themselves at the grade. 1 is a wire to wire chance but think distance might be a bit long for it. 9 should improve second time out and with step up in trip, but unimpressive debut. |
|
By:
Backed the 3 again at 9.
|
|
By:
TAM
2 at 4.0. Churchill Downs shippers are good at TAM. |
|
By:
Think the cutback in trip suits the 2 at Tampa.
Well done with the lay at AQU. That was very comfortable again. |
|
By:
laid the 2 at tam, gl
|
|
By:
going v short though, so you are more likely right about this one..
|
|
By:
Good lay again!
|
|
By:
hello
|
|
By:
HAW R2
1 at 1.92. More like a 1.7 shot to me. The newcommers don't look too promissing. The soft ground might give the 2 a better chance against the 1, but 1 beat the 2 by a length on the mud 2 back and 2 has been poor last 2 times out. |
|
By:
wolves
trying Abbey Angel @ 10/1 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
AQU
8 at 6.0. Stepping up in class, but should improve second time back off layoff. 7 could be dangerous, but may be unfit. 9 looks like a very dodgy class dropper. |
|
By:
Hi BSmith.
|
|
By:
aqu
e/w #11 Tsunami Night @ 50/1 |
|
By:
hello, laid 8 at aq, gl
|
|
By:
last |
|
By:
good shout rowan
|
|
By:
hi
|
|
By:
Thanks Risky.
TAM 3 at 6.2. Should go close if improves second time out off layoff. |