|
By:
Penn place lay of 4, hoping bug will go to quickly in front and get swallowed up in the straight, gl all
|
|
By:
laid the 2, gl
|
|
By:
wd RB
|
|
By:
wd cork you read that perfctly
|
|
By:
not that i expected anything less
![]() |
|
By:
makes a change RB...!
|
|
By:
the "boss" obviously not distracting you now fortunately
![]() |
|
By:
No, I reluctantly relinquished one of the laptops, so she is happily tearing someone else to pieces on facebook...!
|
|
By:
laid the 4 at penn, gl |
|
By:
Penn with 8 and the frustrating 7 gl all
|
|
By:
3 for me at PENN. G/L.
|
|
By:
6-7-8-4 penn
|
|
By:
wd RB
|
|
By:
ty that's it for me tonight, gl and gn
|
|
By:
Worst stewards decision I have ever seen at Mountaineer Race 7. Thought jockey objecting would be fined for wasting stewards time and he won!
|
|
By:
Penn not sure about this 2, never gone 5f on dirt, class drop will obviously help but prefer to go small on 6/9/10 gl all
|
|
By:
don't you think he would've won without the couple of blockers ?
wins by a neck without the interference imo |
|
By:
Penn result 10-4-9
|
|
By:
In a word - no. I watch a lot of racing and I know of no other country where that incident would merit an enquiry. I thought it was fair race riding by the original winner. I had only a place bet on the original winner so not fussed but just thought it was a terrible decision.
|
|
By:
MP the Chas invader 3 should be to good if it acts on track, no way of telling, so small play on 1 & 6 gl all
|
|
By:
MP result the 3 acted on track and duly won, 3-4-2
|
|
By:
Time to retire, gn & gl all
|