Forums

U.S. Horse Racing

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
wantsomespeed
02 Jan 12 17:17
Joined:
Date Joined: 06 Jun 03
| Topic/replies: 26 | Blogger: wantsomespeed's blog
Hi,
I had this data but lost it. I'm trying to find out how many seconds behind the winner my horse would be if it was 'x' number of lengths behind ? Thanks
Pause Switch to Standard View Help please - how long does it take a...
Show More
Loading...
Report Isaac_Newton January 2, 2012 5:38 PM GMT
0.2 seconds
1 second = 5 lengths
Report wantsomespeed January 2, 2012 5:57 PM GMT
Many thanks
Report Cooee January 9, 2012 3:50 AM GMT
0.2's a decent rule of thumb. Actually, 0.22 is probably closer!  (If we're being pedantic, it does depend on how long the race is. You can turn the full race distance of the winner into lengths, and then use that to calculate a more accurate time for the losing horses.  But as a quick jotting, 0.2 is fine...)
Report FrankRA January 11, 2012 5:42 PM GMT
NH is slower,its only .25 second per length.
Report Cooee January 16, 2012 3:13 PM GMT
Well precisely. The longer the race, the higher the second per length will be. US races don't exactly cover a vast range of distances. (1m 2f a 'marathon'???)   But if you're looking at a 2.5m or 3m NH race, using .2 per length will obviously give problems..
Report rkl January 30, 2012 9:42 AM GMT
in mid-summer on a fast surface we used to reckon at about EIGHTEEN YARDS per second, I recall.
Report geoff m January 30, 2012 2:44 PM GMT
5 F fast track
is going to be a hell of a difference to
3M N.H heavy @ Cheltenham
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com