Motley Fool is cheap but they don't have the range of services that is available at HL. I use Interactive Investor that have the full range and I am pretty sure they are cheaper than HL.
Motley Fool is cheap but they don't have the range of services that is available at HL. I use Interactive Investor that have the full range and I am pretty sure they are cheaper than HL.
Their charges seem crazily cheap - no ongoing admin fee (just a £25 setup fee) and a £5 per deal dealing charge.
Compared to someone like Hargreaves Lansdown - 0.45% of held funds charged annually plus dealing charges of £11.95 if you place less than 20 trades a year.
So if you have a £100k portfolio and make 15 trades a year the annual costs are:
iweb - £75 (+£25 in first year)
Hargreaves Lansdown - £629
So, does anybody use iweb?Their charges seem crazily cheap - no ongoing admin fee (just a £25 setup fee) and a £5 per deal dealing charge.Compared to someone like Hargreaves Lansdown - 0.45% of held funds charged annually plus dealing charges of £
I have been looking into this a bit further – online reviews of iweb aren’t great which has put me off a bit.
I am now looking at interactive investor which seems to have a good combination of fees/products for me. There are some poor reviews for them as well but most of these seem to relate to them introducing a quarterly fee on ordinary share accounts which is irrelevant for me.
So – does anybody on here have experience/opinions of Interactive investor?
On the (admittedly very small) off-chance that anybody is actually interested in this subject, the following link was a good resource of information for comparing various sites: . http://monevator.com/compare-uk-cheapest-online-brokers/
I have been looking into this a bit further – online reviews of iweb aren’t great which has put me off a bit.I am now looking at interactive investor which seems to have a good combination of fees/products for me. There are some poor reviews for
Had set up a regular saver to run alongside trading account and the amount of buys they missed was appalling.
Used II and their customer service was shocking. Had set up a regular saver to run alongside trading account and the amount of buys they missed was appalling.
It worked well and they had some decent deals just the human sidecletvthem down.
When I set it up you got a welcome letter with your details.
I ended up with two and could not log on with either
When I called the very helpful advice was to join again!!!
It worked well and they had some decent deals just the human sidecletvthem down. When I set it up you got a welcome letter with your details. I ended up with two and could not log on with either When I called the very helpful advice was to join again
I thought I would come back to this again to point out that I have now found out Hargreaves Lansdown charges of 0.45% aren’t as simple as it first seemed.
There is a full 0.45% charge annually on any money held in traditional funds, however, if you hold shares,ETF’s, investment trusts etc. the 0.45% annual fee still applies BUT ONLY up to a maximum of £45 per year (£3.75 max per year).
In the example of my earlier post (£100k portfolio – 15 trades per year), the platform cost would be £224 (£179 trading fees, £45 AMC).
That’s still a lot more than Interactive Investor but not as prohibitive as I had originally thought.
Because of this I am going to stay with HL for a while to see how the fees landscape lies in a year or two (I suspect there will be changes to all firms fees whilst things settle down).
One other reason for staying with HL is that I have been researching a few obscure “smart beta” ETF’s and more of these seem to be available through HL than other platforms.
I thought I would come back to this again to point out that I have now found out Hargreaves Lansdown charges of 0.45% aren’t as simple as it first seemed.There is a full 0.45% charge annually on any money held in traditional funds, however, if you