Forums

Tradefair & Financials

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 109 comments are related to the topic:
Deflation

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 109
By:
johnnie walker
When: 19 Dec 10 13:32
hi menelaus
dont get me wrong, im not saying the us are recovering ( i didnt make my mind up ). still, im saying that the reason why the treasuries have fallen and yields gone up is because of the latest set of releases which all surprised on the upside ( even the philly on friday, dont know how many yrs we didnt see it so strong ), pushing investors to dump bonds and buy stocks.
do not make the mistake of trying to twist any event in support of your theories. in history of financial markets, there s never been a disorderly distress in the debt market of a country, accompanied by a strong stock market and a strong ccy.  check for example what happened to greece or spain or all the other pigs, their stock markets had a terrible year this year, while their bond market crashed ( and the opposite happened to germanby by the way ). and dont forget the ccy, why would you see investors stampeding out of treasuries but actually buying extra dollars instead of getting rid of them. so of course we have to conclude that the bond market was suffering because of more PERCEIVED 'healthy' reasons.
for what concern the inflation, my one is negative but i guess depends on personal situations and spending patterns. still, lets not confuse higher taxes ( including higher tariffs like school fees ) with higher inflation! as a matter of fact these things have just the effect to decrease even more your spending power.
ehy, at the end of the day (and 80 posts later), i guess pierre at the beginning had nailed the situation exactly and was right all the way thru..
By:
Menelaus
When: 19 Dec 10 15:28
JW

It is true the regional fed bank reports are reporting "improved" numbers, the latest one as you say being Friday with the Philly fed bank manufacturing report showing an activity index of 24.3 in December up from 22.5 in November.

The reason: INFLATION

In the gut of the report you'll find that firms saw increases in prices for inputs and for their own manufactured goods (so much for margin squeeze). This is the ONLY reason the fed mfgr indices are up.

And not that I want to nitpick but the 10YR yield was DOWN 3.38pc on Friday in the face of this "positive" report which totally contradicts your argument.
By:
johnnie walker
When: 19 Dec 10 16:56
of course of course.
i thought we were looking at the big picture and try to explain that one, not the micro, often technical, moves.
what i was trying to tell you is that bonds in general have suffered ( yields gone up from 2.5% ) because of positive feelings and not negative feelings. else you would have had a crash in the stock market and in the usd at the same time. you know my point of view, i dont believe in any catastrophic scenario, but shud one materialize no asset will be spared, as it normally happens.
ehy, i enjoy reading your posts and i sometimes learn new things as you see things from different prospective. just dont assume that everyone else here is a clueless mug. some of us do this for a living ( professionally, not amateur-ly ), so you might learn one thing or two too. you never learn anything by just teaching others, remember. and dont try to contradict everyone else all the times, you actually end up contradicting yourself too.
By:
Menelaus
When: 19 Dec 10 17:19
JW

One minute we prefer the "big picture", the next we're trading the 5-min chart depending which view supports your arguments.

I'm not assuming everyone else is a "clueless mug", except billy who IS a clueless mug and those who still argue deflation in the face of all the evidence (and accelerating) to the contrary.
By:
chisel
When: 20 Dec 10 11:42
Menelaus

Once again you only consider Hyper inflation or deflation!!

Why not just accept that some people(like me) believe that inflation is likely to be slightly above target in the UK for all of 2011, it is 2012 when we need to consider possibility of deflation. I certainly do not believe that there is any threat whatsover of Hyperinflation The tools to the fed and the BOE etc to deal with this are too easy!
By:
Menelaus
When: 20 Dec 10 12:21
chisel, do you make this stuff up as you go along?

First of all, I have never said hyperinflation is a certainty, only that the current FED policies increase the risk of the hyperinflation scenario. May be you'll wake up when the FED announces QE3 to bail out municipalities and states that are now bankrupt or the ECB prints more euros to bail out Spain.

Second, inflation is not "likely to be slightly above target", there's serious inflation working through the system NOW, and that's a certainly, not likely. Your blind belief in the grossly manipulated CPI as reported by the BoE is astounding and I assure you that if you are making investment decisions based on that belief, it will lead to disaster for you.

And last but not least, it's time you wake up and realize that neither the FED nor the BoE have any "tools", only a printing press.
By:
Sir Denis Eton-Hogg
When: 20 Dec 10 14:35
they have plenty of 'tools' but all of them are human
By:
Menelaus
When: 21 Dec 10 10:04
deep Silly
By:
chisel
When: 22 Dec 10 15:04
Menelaus

Your arrogance surrounding this issue is astonishing!! I think that you are so far off the mark it is untrue. I also think that you are being hoodwinked into believing anything you read on teh internet.

CPI is what it is . Nothing else. It is not manipulated.  If teh money was getting through and inflation was as you predict, Interest rates would already be increasing, and QE would have been reeled in. Neither is happening , and I really think you will find that policy makers know more that you . The fact that they agree with my side of teh argument suggests you are wrong.
By:
Menelaus
When: 22 Dec 10 20:36
chisel, I thought only Mr Bean was capable of such a post but you proved me wrong.

Do you even know what CPI measures and HOW it measures it? Do you know anything about hedonics? If you want to base investment decisions based on "CPI is what it is", be my guest, the road to the poor house is lined up with chaps like you.

Interest rates, chisel, are suppressed by central banks and are currently not market driven. Because as Sir Denis so eloquently put it, if interest rates are allowed to rise EVERYONE BLOWS UP. That's why interest rates are not going up, NOT because there's no inflation. As far as QE being reeled in, they have no choice chisel, it's inflate or die, and they'll blow up the whole system before they allowed it to die.

Chisel, stick to commenting about the housing market, although your calls of housing rebounding in 2010 turned out to be all wrong. But at least in this area you have some basis to express an opinion, about other financial matters I think not.
By:
J2BLUE.
When: 25 Dec 10 12:04
Bit sad posting on this thread on Christmas day but this is a genuine interest of mine and to be honest I find the economic world quite entertaining.

First of all hope you all had/have a wonderful Christmas!

Chisel, this line > 'The tools to the fed and the BOE etc to deal with this are too easy!' is absolute pure rubbish. As Menelaus says, the central banks have no tools to deal with the FREE market. Keyword is FREE. Whenever people arrogantly assume they can beat the free market and design a better financial system then the economy is doomed to fail. If you honestly think you see a solution to the problem then contact the fed because they haven't got a clue. They would probably ignore you though because they are a private bank with shareholders. The general public isn't their concern and I find it very hard to believe that anyone who has seen the mountains of evidence could deny that we are headed for hyperinflation with a straight face.

QE, when they are buying their government's debt is basically creating money out of thin air. They have no way to withdraw this money from the market. When the fed is buying government debt the game is all but over.
By:
Mrben
When: 26 Dec 10 04:15
J2 , you must be over at melly's lab for christmas dinner? Either that or you have consumed too much pudding.


your entire post [ except the christmas wishes]  is trash.

Chisel is correct.Theres plenty of evidence to suggest the fed has got it right.Retail sales up, various measures showing postitive turns, S&P highest for 3 years, GDP growth to be 4 % 2011. ONly umemployment remain to turn down to complete the picture.

  Despite the calls for hysteria and collapse  their is no such occurence..

The "games over" the thin air, the economy is doomed to fail , these claims have no substance.

J2 this is laughable " The general public isn't their concern and I find it very hard to believe that anyone who has seen the mountains of evidence could deny that we are headed for hyperinflation with a straight face. "

   You are unable to supply a scintilla of evidence for this.Im guessing your long gold as well?LaughLaughLaughLaugh

The "armaggedon " mob  have no evidence and its not happening.You are all going down on your sinking ship of failed claims.

There not  meltdown and thres not going to be.

J2- if you posted as a drunken christmas day participant your forgiven.If you poated in a serious manner- your as deluded as melly.


Now we can all look forward to mellys rant in reply.No doubt filled with abuse but nothing of substance.
By:
Menelaus
When: 26 Dec 10 08:40
Mr Bean's FIRST post-Christmas 2010 memorable and worthless quote addressed to 32BLUE:

"your entire post [ except the christmas wishes]  is trash."



The remainder of Mr Bean's post is nothing more than ad hominen attacks and the now famous "trust me" or "it is so because I say so" statements. Let's have a look:

"Despite the calls for hysteria and collapse  their is no such occurence.."

(Start with spelling occurrence correctly, then EXPLAIN why and we just might forget that you don't even know how money gets created Laugh)

"The "games over" the thin air, the economy is doomed to fail , these claims have no substance."

(...and why, my hyperinflation is "huge inflation" friend? Laugh)

"There not  meltdown and thres not going to be."

(Again start with spelling "there's" correctly and adding "one" at the end of the sentence and we......never mind, I doubt we would ever take seriously anything you post on here no matter what Laugh)

and the "piece de resistance", "You are unable to supply a scintilla of evidence for this"

(And you have in your ad hominem, baseless, worthless, filled of rubbish and stupidity counter argument??? - if one can possibly call your foul mouthed personal attack on another poster "an argument".





Mr Bean, you used to provide comedic entertainment on here and nothing more. Now you managed to add vile to your repertoire.
By:
J2BLUE.
When: 26 Dec 10 11:53
Mrben, I hope you had a good day yesterday!

No evidence for hyperinflation? Are you serious? At the moment we have high inflation, everything from soybeans to cotton is up leading one major clothes manufacturer to announce that the era of cheap clothing is over.

In China where they export far more than they import they are receiving loads of dollars for their goods. There are more dollars around after the fed's money printing (and that is what it is, don't give me this QE b0llocks) and because the Chinese central bank have to exchange these dollars at a price which is pegged to the Yuan there is more Yuan in circulation leading to inflation in China (they've just put their interest rates up). The Chinese are quite literally importing our inflation and when they finally depeg their currency from the dollar it is going to come crashing back to America. The world is losing confidence in the dollar and that is how hyperinflation occurs. It's an open secret that the Chinese are buying gold and commodities by the ton and encouraging their citizens to invest in precious metals. Even Chinese pig farmers have bought copper as an investment.

I'm not arrogantly claiming I am definitely not, this is just the opinion I come to when I see the evidence. I might be wrong and yes i'm long silver and gold but if they drop 50% and the economy recovers I would take that every day! I honestly hope you are right, I just don't see it.
By:
J2BLUE.
When: 26 Dec 10 11:54
I'm not arrogantly claiming I am definitely right*
By:
Mrben
When: 27 Dec 10 04:13
melly, dont bother reply to my posts.I dont read them anymore.

thanks for your wishes J2.Chrissy day was pretty good,hope you enjoyed it also.The next day however was dreadful when the poms made mincemeat of us in the cricketCry

re inflation in china,what is it, 6%?Thats hardly high, higher than it was but not high.
the world id not losing confidence in the dollar, confidence is down but not lost by a long way.

Extrapolations are being over done all over the place.
People are taking any %%%% moves and extrapolating the daylights out of the.This is where we are getting "silver to go to 100, gold to go to 5,000 oil to go over 200, hyperinflation is imminent.All are absurd.

I remember a few years ago when platinum was i think 2400 that  "its going over 10,000" because its used in catalytic converters in cars and the chinese  will be having  100 million extra cars.Remember that story.?? Platinum is around 1700 today.

  What you find is that when all the predictions are for catastrophy its plain sailing.
When booms are predicted, recession soon follows.
Gold down, silver down, USD up- thats the way to bet from here.

I can hear melly chocking on his cornflakes from here.Laugh
By:
J2BLUE.
When: 27 Dec 10 12:38
Good stuff. Christmas Day was quite boring! Yesterday was a better day thankfully.

So your logic is the opposite of the masses? Fair enough, the masses are usally wrong but there is a very small number of people in gold and silver and I personally believe we are in stage 2 of a bull market. The Chinese as a nation are investing in gold and silver after being encouraged by their government and the government is purchasing base metals and precious metals by the ton to get out of US dollars. When your biggest creditor is trying to get out of your currency and into something 'safe' that surely is a warning to the world? We hear more and more stories of the dollar losing its position in the world market, now i'm not saying it isn't important because it is, but countries are beginning to look away from the dollar.

I find it amazing in the other thread you predicted three more shots of QE yet are seemingly long on the US dollar? If anything, if I expected three more shots (and I do expect at least one) i'd want to put my money into metals. I am long on silver mainly and a little gold and i'll happily put that into every post so if i'm wrong it will be there for everyone to see. I think you could do far worse than to hedge your bets mrben with a few tubes of silver maples or eagles.
By:
Menelaus
When: 27 Dec 10 15:28
melly, dont bother reply to my posts.I dont read them anymore.


And who's to blame you ?!?! If I were you, I wouldn't want to read the drivel you keep posting either.

Mr Bean, you may have a future as a stand-up comedian but as a financial markets commentator.....not so much.

LaughLaughLaugh
By:
Mrben
When: 27 Dec 10 23:43
"I find it amazing in the other thread you predicted three more shots of QE yet are seemingly long on the US dollar? "

yeh, I know that seems a bit contradictory .However I visited USA  2 months ago and I can say its much worse "on the ground" than is being reported by the media.Americans as individuals are crushed both financially and their spirit.The  reduction in personal wealth there is huge.Hence I see QE 1/2/3/4/5/6/ etc merely replacing what has been lost,  rather than adding on top of whats already there.Thats the same reason I dont see inflation caused by QE's.
   We already have had QE's and inflation has only nudged  up a bit.Theres no convincing argument to say that the next ones will be any different.

  My logic is not so much to be opposite of the masses,I was long gold all 2010 for example.But I think these races have been run.The finishing post  looms large.

    I do see the possibility that the US economy  can improve in 2011,I mean its pretty low now so theres plenty of potential for the upside. If the US improves the mood will shift to " the US is now in recovery " Hence the USD has upside potential also.

   My trading is based on thinking things thru from a behavioral and political stand point as well as from a pure economist view.
     I  do not believe that politicians will let  things collapse to ground zero.That extrapolation is a purist economist  perspective.

  I'm betting on a bit of US recovery, a bit of USD strengthing, hence I believe gold will actually fall from the 1400$ mark.Silver has little potential for the upside as well.The industrial value of silver is around 17$ or even less.Past this point the industrial cost becomes uneconomical and demand fall for finished product.The current price is driven by speculation.

   A better bet is the big mining  iron ore and maybe oil companies.BHP and RIO tinto have upside for 2011.
By:
Menelaus
When: 28 Dec 10 07:31
Mr Bean, if there was ever any doubt that you posted the worse drivel on this forum during 2010, you absolutely nailed it with this post. If anyone after reading this rubbish doesn't run to the liquor cabinet for a shot (or two) of their favourite single malt then nothing would induce then to do so.

Your stuff is not even laughable any more, it is simply seriously deranged.
By:
J2BLUE.
When: 28 Dec 10 12:04
Thanks for the reply and i'm surprised that you say it's much worse than being reported because I saw someone on Kitco forums say it was far better than being reported! I guess it's all done to personal viewpoint.

I think the key thing about QE not causing inflation is that the US imports far more than it exports and therefore those dollars are leaving the country. The Chinese have just raised interest rates for the second time in quick succession because they are receiving the dollars which then have to be coverted to yuan at a certain price causing inflation in China! It's not so much a case of QE not causing inflation as causing inflation elsewhere. How long will China stand for US money printing disrupting their system? They have the dollar reserves and the option to depeg their currency to take down America if they wish. There will be a point where they decide America is done and depeg their currency which will strengthen the Yuan and therefore increase the purchasing power of the Chinese people who will begin consuming the things they produce so I think there will be a transitional period where maybe China loses out but eventually they will win big time!

This makes me bullish on copper and silver because the Chinese will want the same standard of living they have been subsiding for us all these years and they will begin to consume electronics etc which use copper and silver. I wouldn't be surprised to see a gold backed Yuan become the new world reserve currency (that is pure speculation on my part, I haven't read anything about that anywhere)
By:
Rollo Tomasi
When: 28 Dec 10 12:41
Chisel "CPI is what it is"

Do you understand what it is? It is an index. I defy anyone to look at the official figures and make a case for low "underlying inflation". It's going through the figures and increasing miles faster than in the past. It's gone up 10 pts in just the last 3 years.

1992 Apr    80.2
1992 May    80.5
1992 Jun    80.6
1992 Jul    80.2
1992 Aug    80.2
1992 Sep    80.5
1992 Oct    80.7
1992 Nov    80.8
1992 Dec    80.8
1993 Jan    80.4
1993 Feb    80.9
1993 Mar    81.3
1993 Apr    82.2
1993 May    82.5
1993 Jun    82.5
1993 Jul    82.2
1993 Aug    82.5
1993 Sep    82.9
1993 Oct    82.8
1993 Nov    82.6
1993 Dec    82.8
1994 Jan    82.5
1994 Feb    82.9
1994 Mar    83.1
1994 Apr    83.9
1994 May    84.1
1994 Jun    84.1
1994 Jul    83.6
1994 Aug    84.1
1994 Sep    84.2
1994 Oct    84
1994 Nov    84.1
1994 Dec    84.5
1995 Jan    84.5
1995 Feb    84.9
1995 Mar    85.3
1995 Apr    85.8
1995 May    86.2
1995 Jun    86.3
1995 Jul    85.8
1995 Aug    86.3
1995 Sep    86.7
1995 Oct    86.5
1995 Nov    86.5
1995 Dec    87
1996 Jan    86.8
1996 Feb    87.2
1996 Mar    87.5
1996 Apr    88
1996 May    88.3
1996 Jun    88.4
1996 Jul    87.8
1996 Aug    88.3
1996 Sep    88.7
1996 Oct    88.7
1996 Nov    88.7
1996 Dec    89
1997 Jan    88.6
1997 Feb    88.8
1997 Mar    89
1997 Apr    89.4
1997 May    89.6
1997 Jun    89.8
1997 Jul    89.5
1997 Aug    90
1997 Sep    90.3
1997 Oct    90.3
1997 Nov    90.4
1997 Dec    90.5
1998 Jan    89.9
1998 Feb    90.3
1998 Mar    90.5
1998 Apr    91
1998 May    91.5
1998 Jun    91.3
1998 Jul    90.8
1998 Aug    91.2
1998 Sep    91.6
1998 Oct    91.6
1998 Nov    91.7
1998 Dec    91.9
1999 Jan    91.4
1999 Feb    91.5
1999 Mar    92
1999 Apr    92.4
1999 May    92.7
1999 Jun    92.6
1999 Jul    92
1999 Aug    92.3
1999 Sep    92.7
1999 Oct    92.6
1999 Nov    92.7
1999 Dec    93
2000 Jan    92.1
2000 Feb    92.4
2000 Mar    92.6
2000 Apr    92.9
2000 May    93.2
2000 Jun    93.3
2000 Jul    92.8
2000 Aug    92.8
2000 Sep    93.6
2000 Oct    93.5
2000 Nov    93.7
2000 Dec    93.7
2001 Jan    92.9
2001 Feb    93.1
2001 Mar    93.4
2001 Apr    94
2001 May    94.7
2001 Jun    94.9
2001 Jul    94.2
2001 Aug    94.5
2001 Sep    94.8
2001 Oct    94.7
2001 Nov    94.5
2001 Dec    94.7
2002 Jan    94.4
2002 Feb    94.5
2002 Mar    94.9
2002 Apr    95.3
2002 May    95.5
2002 Jun    95.5
2002 Jul    95.2
2002 Aug    95.5
2002 Sep    95.7
2002 Oct    95.9
2002 Nov    95.9
2002 Dec    96.3
2003 Jan    95.7
2003 Feb    96
2003 Mar    96.3
2003 Apr    96.7
2003 May    96.7
2003 Jun    96.5
2003 Jul    96.5
2003 Aug    96.8
2003 Sep    97.1
2003 Oct    97.2
2003 Nov    97.2
2003 Dec    97.5
2004 Jan    97
2004 Feb    97.2
2004 Mar    97.4
2004 Apr    97.8
2004 May    98.1
2004 Jun    98.1
2004 Jul    97.8
2004 Aug    98.1
2004 Sep    98.2
2004 Oct    98.4
2004 Nov    98.6
2004 Dec    99.1
2005 Jan    98.6
2005 Feb    98.8
2005 Mar    99.3
2005 Apr    99.7
2005 May    100
2005 Jun    100
2005 Jul    100.1
2005 Aug    100.4
2005 Sep    100.6
2005 Oct    100.7
2005 Nov    100.7
2005 Dec    101
2006 Jan    100.5
2006 Feb    100.9
2006 Mar    101.1
2006 Apr    101.7
2006 May    102.2
2006 Jun    102.5
2006 Jul    102.5
2006 Aug    102.9
2006 Sep    103
2006 Oct    103.2
2006 Nov    103.4
2006 Dec    104
2007 Jan    103.2
2007 Feb    103.7
2007 Mar    104.2
2007 Apr    104.5
2007 May    104.8
2007 Jun    105
2007 Jul    104.4
2007 Aug    104.7
2007 Sep    104.8
2007 Oct    105.3
2007 Nov    105.6
2007 Dec    106.2
2008 Jan    105.5
2008 Feb    106.3
2008 Mar    106.7
2008 Apr    107.6
2008 May    108.3
2008 Jun    109
2008 Jul    109
2008 Aug    109.7
2008 Sep    110.3
2008 Oct    110
2008 Nov    109.9
2008 Dec    109.5
2009 Jan    108.7
2009 Feb    109.6
2009 Mar    109.8
2009 Apr    110.1
2009 May    110.7
2009 Jun    111
2009 Jul    110.9
2009 Aug    111.4
2009 Sep    111.5
2009 Oct    111.7
2009 Nov    112
2009 Dec    112.6
2010 Jan    112.4
2010 Feb    112.9
2010 Mar    113.5
2010 Apr    114.2
2010 May    114.4
2010 Jun    114.6
2010 Jul    114.3
2010 Aug    114.9
2010 Sep    114.9
2010 Oct    115.2
2010 Nov    115.6

http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/product.asp?vlnk=868
By:
Menelaus
When: 28 Dec 10 13:10
Good post but even the accelerating numbers don't tell the whole story because the methodology of calculating the CPI was changed several times since 1993 with the sole intention of understating inflation. Changes like substitution, switching from an arithmetic weighting to a geometric one and hedonics in calculating CPI all drove the stated inflation DOWN once implemented.

For those still arguing "low or no inflation", pay attention to your bills not CPI.
By:
Mrben
When: 28 Dec 10 22:20
Gee Rollo, I hope that was a cut and paste and you did'nt have to enter all those numbersCry

what you have shown there is that inflation is infact low.It show a slight increase lately, a blip upwards.Nothing in those numbers indicate  inflation is doing anything unusual.


"miles faster than in the past. It's gone up 10 pts in just the last 3 years."

please take another look at the figues and try to work out why this statement is incorrect re speed.




'
By:
Menelaus
When: 28 Dec 10 22:38
Mr Bean, since you shouting the loudest as usual again, as often the most ignorant do on here, why don't you post explaining the methodology the Office for National Statistics uses to calculate CPI.

Impress us what you may actually know, not what you think you know and couldn't be further away from the truth.

I think we are in for a long wait for this post.
By:
Rollo Tomasi
When: 29 Dec 10 12:23
Mrben,
It's a cut and paste from the link I provided.

10pt rises in the index are coming quicker than ever.

115.6 Nov 2010
3 years
105.6 Nov 2007
5 years
95.5 May 2002
7 years
85.3 March 1995
By:
Mrben
When: 31 Dec 10 05:23
thats good news rollo.

as a new years presi I'll make it easy for you.Its not about "points" its about   %%%%%%%%

enjoy new years eve.[smiley:crazy]
By:
Menelaus
When: 31 Dec 10 08:01
Mr Bean, truly you are the most ignorant poster on here by some margin.

I say you haven't a clue how CPI is calculated but you still insist in spewing rubbish on this forum every time you log on.

Here's my post from a few days ago which you conveniently ignored:

"Mr Bean, since you shouting the loudest as usual again, as often the most ignorant do on here, why don't you post explaining the methodology the Office for National Statistics uses to calculate CPI.

Impress us what you may actually know, not what you think you know and couldn't be further away from the truth.

I think we are in for a long wait for this post."



Post the answer and shut me up. I say you can't because you haven't a clue. Prove me wrong.
By:
Rollo Tomasi
When: 31 Dec 10 13:52
Mrben
I knew you would resort to %. It's true that looking at 10 pt rises makes it look worse because as the index increases 10pts is a lower percentage of the total. So OK just look at how long it has taken the most recent 5% increases in the index going backwards.

115.6 Nov 10
20 months
109.8 Mar 09
24 months
104.3 Mar 07
27 months
99.1 Dec 04
39 months
94.1 Apr 01
48 months
89.4 Apr 97

It's clear that since 97 the months it takes per 5% rise has shortened dramatically i..e inflation is rising at a much faster rate.
By:
Menelaus
When: 31 Dec 10 17:31
Rollo, you are wasting your time. Mr Bean hasn't a clue what the numbers you posted mean or how they are derived. In addition, as I posted earlier, the numbers would be a lot worse if the Government hadn't changed the methodology of calculating CPI several times over the years.
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com