Forums

Tradefair & Financials

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Jack Hacksaw
28 May 10 10:51
Joined:
Date Joined: 08 Jan 02
| Topic/replies: 5,322 | Blogger: Jack Hacksaw's blog
Libs seem to want to put it up to 40% but the Tories fear a backlash from their supporters, apparently.

Fair idea would be to tax it at marginal rate?
Show More
Loading...
Report madasahatter May 28, 2010 11:32 AM BST
It's illogical to have differing rates for income and capital gains.  'Clever' people and accountants will spirit their income/gains to the most beneficial rate.  John Redwood's claim that as you reduce rates of CGT the actual revenue increases has to be weighed against the loss of revenue from income tax - it's all smoke and mirrors.

The old system of taxing gains at your prevailing income tax rate, less the permitted allowances, and profit adjusted to negate the effect of inflation, was reasonably sound.

CGT has far too many anomalies.  With many asset classes not being subject to CGT such as clocks, historic cars, principal places of residence, firearms etc.  It's a poor tax that many are able to legitimately avoid, yet catch the unlucky.  That especially applies to forced company takeovers where shareholders have to take the money and suffer CGT, yet if given the choice, would have continued to hold the shares.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com