Tradefair & Financials
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Headlines front page Sunday Times. Toxic debts hidden by Brown; its all even worse than they thought. Therefore the cuts, the taxes and all the other misery is going to be worse than they thought and its all Gordon’s fault.
I have hated Gordon for years for his love of the rich his worship of the Yanks and his war mongering. He was supposed to be in the Labour party not the Banker and internationalist stooge party. He was supposed to be in the Labour party not in the cheer leader for the party of “Lets all get rich by borrowing as much money as possible, inflating our house prices to infinity; drowning ourselves in cappuccino and burying ourselves in tons of other purchases we do not need” he was supposed to be in the labour party not the “Dream of the eternal boom” party.
But he wasn’t the only one. I never complained about the benefits I got from the house price boom. We know its Gordon’s fault, we know it’s the Yanks and loads of other foreigners fault, we know it’s the bakers fault.
But the Tories would have been worse.
Ok the Libdems made some useful criticisms of the war and the financial philandering. Easy actually when you have no power to lose.
Now they have a tickle of very weak power they show their true colours. Opportunists and sell out merchants. Always have been always will be.
Last but not least the GBP are not children or idiots. Nobody forced them to borrow to live like kings while, lets be frank, they are not that good at actually working.Hence the jobs for the immigrants. I hate working myself but nobody should expect to live in 300K house or sell it for massive profit… for nothing.
But oh no it’ll all be Gordon’s fault and the cuts are going to be draconian. They will be saying “We did not intend to do it, we do not want to do it but Boo hoo it’s a shame. Gordon has forced our hand.”
And the Tories will behave as Tories always do.
And Cameron will have little Cleggy in his pocket.
I have posted on politics too but you get a different angle on here.
And less abuse.
I have hated Gordon for years for his love of the rich his worship of the Yanks and his war mongering. He was supposed to be in the Labour party not the Banker and internationalist stooge party. He was supposed to be in the Labour party not in the cheer leader for the party of “Lets all get rich by borrowing as much money as possible, inflating our house prices to infinity; drowning ourselves in cappuccino and burying ourselves in tons of other purchases we do not need” he was supposed to be in the labour party not the “Dream of the eternal boom” party.
But he wasn’t the only one. I never complained about the benefits I got from the house price boom. We know its Gordon’s fault, we know it’s the Yanks and loads of other foreigners fault, we know it’s the bakers fault.
But the Tories would have been worse.
Ok the Libdems made some useful criticisms of the war and the financial philandering. Easy actually when you have no power to lose.
Now they have a tickle of very weak power they show their true colours. Opportunists and sell out merchants. Always have been always will be.
Last but not least the GBP are not children or idiots. Nobody forced them to borrow to live like kings while, lets be frank, they are not that good at actually working.Hence the jobs for the immigrants. I hate working myself but nobody should expect to live in 300K house or sell it for massive profit… for nothing.
But oh no it’ll all be Gordon’s fault and the cuts are going to be draconian. They will be saying “We did not intend to do it, we do not want to do it but Boo hoo it’s a shame. Gordon has forced our hand.”
And the Tories will behave as Tories always do.
And Cameron will have little Cleggy in his pocket.
I have posted on politics too but you get a different angle on here.
And less abuse.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 8
|
By:
Should be; "The Labour party not the Banker and international finacier" stooge party.
|
|
By:
he wasnt the only one.......thought he was chancellor..nicked 5 or 6 billion from pensions......yeah definatly gordons fault.
|
|
By:
don't forget the Brown Bottom.
|
|
By:
sold all the gold at the bottom of the market and promoted the sale so price fell even more - why? Well it benefited certain banks with an awkward gold position at the time
worshiped the City and built UK future on ponzi City "financial innovation" schemes. |
|
By:
if you dont blame gordon---WHO DO YOU BLAME?
|
|
By:
We can collectively blame the following groups of people (in no particular order):
1. The labour party and people who vote for them 2. The FSA 3. Stoners/wasters/layabouts 4. Estate agents 5. Economics teachers 6. Public unions and their members 7. Bankers 8. Mervyn King and anyone connected with the Bank of England 9. Rich c**ts who don't pay any tax 10. Consumers of foreign made goods Feel free to add any other groups of people you can think of! |
|
By:
Alan Greenspan the man in charge of the federal bank and a major proponent of lack of regulation of financial institutions for not realising that moneymen won't necessarily give 2 hoots for the reputation of the financial institution that employs them.
|
|
By:
Politicians ask you to vote for them on the basis that they know what's best. There are no qualifications required to become an MP, so it may be reasonable to assume that they are chancers. Now, putting one of these people in charge of ANY country's finances is ridiculous. Gordon, Shmorden - it doesn't matter; the likes of George Soros will eat them up.
The US now has in President Obama a prime example of the spend, spend, spend and print more cash persuasion, just as that country's debt approaches 100% of it's GDP. The UK is already technically bust as are half of the Eurozone countries. The end is nigh and never forget that we turkeys voted for a the finances of the madhouse by electing these people, so that a large portion of the contents Santy's remarkable sack was to be stuffed into the stockings of G. Soros, the denizens of the halls of "banking," Wall Street at al. |