Forums

Tradefair & Financials

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
ImSoLuckyLucky!
28 Feb 10 20:14
Joined:
Date Joined: 31 Dec 04
| Topic/replies: 18,944 | Blogger: ImSoLuckyLucky!'s blog
Your out of order
With debts of some £78 million
Portsmouth is a club dieing
Why should the taxpayer fund these excesses??

As the last man been paid out the vat man is on a hidng to nothing

Why shouldnt the players take the hit!!!

:)

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3
By:
chisel
When: 01 Mar 10 08:46
The tax payer is funding nothing!! Get a life. There are clubs out there that owe more money than Pompey.

My point is that the club is worth more in administartion than wound up! The tax man and hence taxpayer will get more money thi sway than the other. I have already explained why!
By:
Live4
When: 01 Mar 10 14:47
Chisel, the tax payer is funding the unpaid VAT/PAYE. This is money owed to the government (aka the british tax payer). It all goes into the same pot.

And if, by not liquidising the club and allowing them to continue trading, unpaid VAT/PAYE contributions continue to mount up then NO it will not be good for the tax payer.
By:
chisel
When: 01 Mar 10 16:17
Live 4

I fthe club were wound up teh taxpayer would get sweet FA. In Administartion they will be entitled to a ot more!

I explained to the previous poster that if a club is wound up the players beconme free agents. They are not the property of the club. In administration they are!!
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com