Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1799 comments are related to the topic:
Tennis Talk 2023: Vol 3 (Australian Open)

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 45  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 45 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,799
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 00:48
Kudermetova's sister who Veronika claims her dream is to play in Wimbledon final in 2024. I thought it was optimistic of Veronika to think Russians will be allowed to play Wimbledon 2024.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 00:49
Though I think she's crumbling under the Aussie, Aussie, Aussie chants atm anyway, so maybe nothing to worry about for Kostyuk.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 00:49
the Kazahks should buy her too!
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 16 Jan 23 00:50
Lys takes the 1st set 6-2 !
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 00:56
There was an article a few weeks ago claiming Wimbledon might change their stance. Albeit I'll believe it when I see it. I also thought the article made zero sense in the thinking it presented. It was Daily Mail I think, but you'd think it was briefed via someone close to Wimbledon. But the theory was Wimbledon were very disappointed by the lack of support they received from rest of tour over banning Russians, and LTA are upset at being fined by WTA and ATP, and because of a lack of a support they might change their stance under pressure to do so.

This thinking kinda makes no sense to me, especially if you're briefing it. How is we expected others to follow suit, but they didn't, and we're unhappy how we've been ostracised, so now we might cave anyway a stance exactly?
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 00:57
Polina defo crumbling under the Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:01
Fully crumbled now.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:01
The premise of the article also didn't make sense with what we were led to believe last year, especially what Henman said on TV, who should have good info being on committee, where he said they had no choice in reality, as the government said they wouldn't give the players visas. If that's the truth, then there's not a lot Wimbledon can actually do regardless, and it's not a stance I'd expect to change from the government.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:02
If it wasn't LTA/Wimbledon's call to begin with (has that been established?), and nothing good came out of it for them, I could see them just go "screw this, we don't wanna have to deal with this hassle again". But then again, if it wasn't their call last year it likely won't be going forward either.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:02
I posted before I saw your post.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:04
Yes, and it is a key part of the equation, as I don't expect the government to change one iota if that's the truth. But we don't know for sure. It could have just been an easy blame game line to shift the blame to someone else.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:04
it will be interesting if they stick with zero points again if the ban stays. Can't see someone like Djokovic, who should have a lot of say, being happy with that. Maybe time for the PTPA to step up Devil
By:
Journeyman
When: 16 Jan 23 01:04
The thing I've found a bit hard to get my head round is Novak's lack of support for Wimbledon's right to take an independent stance.

I'd have thought having been on the sharp end of a united groupthink agenda he'd have appreciated the value of having an independent voice that could take a different stance when needed.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:05
I do think if they're banned again, there will be more uproar from the players this year. As several have already been vocal against it.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:05
agreed. There should have been last year, but now they have seen the effects of it. Which were pretty obvious from the beginning btw.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:06
I was surprised how little backlash they actually got from the players, I strongly expected a lawsuit that never came.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 16 Jan 23 01:07
That would have gone on for a very long time, and been a big cloud over all parties.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:07
good call on Moutet so far.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:08
But there seems to be some expectation from like Sabalenka's words that they will just be let back, but I really wouldn't count her chickens. As a country politically our stances are likely to get more anti-Russian if anything, there will be uproar for sure in our tabloids if they are allowed to play. Which tbf has been made a bigger thing by banning them last year.
By:
Journeyman
When: 16 Jan 23 01:09
Sabalenka is definitely Kostyuk's main 'target' at the moment.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:10

Jan 16, 2023 -- 1:07AM, Angela Rebecchi wrote:


That would have gone on for a very long time, and been a big cloud over all parties.


The players are losing a huge amount of money though. Both prize money and sponsorship. The precedent is also dangerous. I pointed out last year this is unlikely to be over by next year, which now seems almost certain to be the case, it could easily go on for several years, are they really going to just accept being banned for years with no response.

By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 16 Jan 23 01:11
I think with recency bias, the war was fairly new, they let it go last year. This year, I can see big opposition if they try to ban them again.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:12
The precedent is one reason Djokovic for sure can't get behind it for who mentioned him. Given there's talk of Serbia invading Kosovo, same precedent would see him banned then. Especially as anti-Serbian rhetoric would be easy to come when they're one of the few European countries pro-Russia to begin with.
By:
wisewords
When: 16 Jan 23 01:12
love you Jess! thanks Happy
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:13
It also may have come too quickly, like how soon before was this actually announced, how much time did they have to consider a response.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:13
this Discovery+ doesn't offer much. Only commentary for one match at the moment, the Gauff one?
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:15
I have that on via ES on TV anyway. It doesn't offer much bar much higher quality streams than watching via wherever else.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:16
It not offering much is why I never actually paid for it anyway! I only have it because since last year BT (and Sky for that matter) have done deals so it's all part of their package now, so as BT subscriber I get Discovery + for "free".
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:16
I think mighty Eva Lys has called the trainer.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:16
I was promised Laura Robson Devil
And the betting streams which used to have commentary for Aussie Open doesn't seem to have commentary this year Sad
By:
Journeyman
When: 16 Jan 23 01:16
It's a shame Amanda's going to be the first seed out (presumably).
This version of Kostyuk is a grim first round draw for a seed.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:17
Lee S
@underarm_ace
·
1h
Well this is disappointing, that Discovery+ aren't taking any world feed commentary at all. Four matches with their own commentary and none anywhere else.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 16 Jan 23 01:17
coco said. i don't want to go 3 !
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 16 Jan 23 01:19
What's going on with Lys? 5-0 down and 3.0...
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:19
Polina Kudermetova proper crumbled under the Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi chants.
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:19
trainer Kalinskaya.
By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:19

Jan 16, 2023 -- 1:19AM, Angela Rebecchi wrote:


What's going on with Lys? 5-0 down and 3.0...


Trainer, not even on court yet, so don't have info beyond that.

By:
n88uk
When: 16 Jan 23 01:20
Oh is on court now talking, but can't hear anything. I wouldn't have said I noticed anything serious though.
By:
Angela Rebecchi
When: 16 Jan 23 01:21
Yeah, same here. Dare not trade in the market given these delays though Sad
By:
SamuelMertensBertens
When: 16 Jan 23 01:21

Jan 16, 2023 -- 1:17AM, n88uk wrote:


Lee S@underarm_ace·1hWell this is disappointing, that Discovery+ aren't taking any world feed commentary at all. Four matches with their own commentary and none anywhere else.


and one of them is Sue Thearle CryCryCry and the woman on the Gauff match was no good either.

Page 2 of 45  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 45 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com