Oct 11, 2020 -- 9:17AM, Angoose wrote:
Weren't masks around before nose jobs
they were invented first time a caveman took a club to another caveman's face
Oct 11, 2020 -- 9:30AM, Angoose wrote:
How do the set betters on here tend to play those markets ?Do you play them with a view to a trade, or a vehicle to better value than the match odds?For example, Nadal was 1.71 pre-match, but you could have got 2.27 if you coupled a 3 and 4 set win.
there's a popular saying on this forum. it goes: set betting is for mugs
Oct 11, 2020 -- 9:44AM, nofx wrote:
Oct 11, 2020 -- 3:30PM, Angoose wrote:How do the set betters on here tend to play those markets ?Do you play them with a view to a trade, or a vehicle to better value than the match odds?For example, Nadal was 1.71 pre-match, but you could have got 2.27 if you coupled a 3 and 4 set win.there's a popular saying on this forum. it goes: set betting is for mugs
So how does a non-mug take money from the mugs
Oct 11, 2020 -- 9:57AM, nofx wrote:
use to be there was a little bit more money in the set betting and you could use it for Ret insurance
Now that's a helpful answer.
Similar to betting on the coin toss in cricket.
Oct 11, 2020 -- 10:14AM, SontaranStratagem wrote:
Fair play to Kyrgios can't fault him there More to life than sport
like catching several strains of chlamydia
Oct 11, 2020 -- 10:27AM, Coachbuster wrote:
rafa is just a monster on brick
Oct 11, 2020 -- 11:05AM, wisewords wrote:
Nadal had an easy QF and SF. Djokovic acted finished against PCB then went life and death 5 sets with Tsitsipas
That is all true, but I feel that we often look for reasons why but just end up with rationalizations to eliminate our unwanted cognitive dissonance.