Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 129101 comments are related to the topic:
It's time for S/OT 6
It's time for S/OT 6
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 129,101
|
By:
yeh this is a bit different tho, can see fury just jabbing and grabbing like he did v wlad
|
|
By:
it seems the QB is Alex Smith
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
he did I agree but hes gonna smother deontay and he wont get the windmills off
|
|
By:
not once in 12 rounds?
|
|
By:
maybe im totally wrong, either way theres gonna be a rematch, 2 way apparently
|
|
By:
old man Wlad couldn't get his punches off as Fury was so big and was moving so well
|
|
By:
but Wilder isn't old, and he's pretty fast. Fury moved like Mr. Blobby when he fought a few months back
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
tbh id love to see the end of wilder, the guys a bit of a to sser and too scared to fight aj
|
|
By:
 just got to the bit where he starts screaming "theres only one bronze bomber" he couldnt think of anything to say lmao |
|
By:
did you laugh out loud also?
|
|
By:
DER'S ONLY ONEEE BRONZE BOMBER
|
|
By:
I did
|
|
By:
derrrr's only oneeeeeeeeee bronze bomber
|
|
By:
he looked so stupid I couldnt help but laugh
|
|
By:
alter ego aswell, what a **** |
|
By:
he thinks hes beyonce?
|
|
By:
Chilean soccer just made me smile. all my loss from Bellucci back
|
|
By:
got 2/1 for overs in Chile
|
|
By:
Cooper why is Thomaz Bellucci such a ****? losing to some Croat youth. ffs Thomaz
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
yeah probs, but he's on the comeback trail, only ranked like 250 so thought he'd want to gets some wins
|
|
By:
we've bet on hundreds of thousands of events by now right? on stuff you bet on super regularly, do you sometimes sense the odds are trying to snare you? like the odds have been set to own you/trick you
|
|
By:
how do u mean? something looks to good to be true?
|
|
By:
like for example, o2.5 in Chile at 2/1 at HT, score 1-0. it should be around evens-2.1 range. but the odds are signalling a low goals return, so if you're inexperienced at betting on these events, it triggers you intil thinking unders is a good bet there
|
|
By:
triggers you into* thinking
|
|
By:
so you back unders, and then you lose.
|
|
By:
and why did you back unders? because the odds tricked you into doing so. if you're experienced in betting on things then you can spot the traps way more often so you don't get caught out
|
|
By:
it's similar to say Liverpool v Man City on the weekend. odds setup as if it's going to be 5 or 6 goals. but there's nothing to suggest that would be the case. so loads of people back o2.5, o3.5 etc and get owned. ok it ended 0-0, quite rare. but the odds modelling can often be so misleading and it pushes people into traps
|
|
By:
you get what I mean? rather than having netural odds, I call them biased odds which push you into the wrong idea about what might happen in an event
|
|
By:
neutral*
|
|
By:
right, another example. unders is your speciality in soccer. Bournemouth v Palace a few weeks back on Monday Night Football. under 3.5 was like 1.4, you thought that was too big. "what have I missed?" you asked. well you'd infact missed nothing. the odds had been set in a slightly biased way to suggest it was going to be a goalfest. match ended up being 2-1. under 3.5 won fairly comfortably
|
|
By:
that was an example of me thinking the odds were too good to be true but I dont let things like that put me off normally, I just go with my gut feeling and knowledge of the league and teams involved
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
but if you weren't experienced/knowledgable about the thing you were betting on, you see how they own you by the way they set the odds?
|
|
By:
knowledgeable*
|