They have played twice this year. The first time was at Indian Wells, and Nadal was underdog purely because he hadn't shown too much at that stage of his comeback (it was the later rounds of IW that made everyone realise 'holy crap, Rafa is back), and it was his first hard court tournament. Similarly, Federer's decline was not quite so much in evidence 4-5 months ago as it is now.
They played again at Rome a couple of months later and Rafa was about 1.25.
They have played twice this year. The first time was at Indian Wells, and Nadal was underdog purely because he hadn't shown too much at that stage of his comeback (it was the later rounds of IW that made everyone realise 'holy crap, Rafa is back), an
The two greatest players to ever pick up a tennis racquet, but Nadal has this match up figured out. Expect lots of backhands from RF and a win for RN. Yes RF was (1.88 on here) favourite at their last meeting in Indian Wells.
The two greatest players to ever pick up a tennis racquet, but Nadal has this match up figured out. Expect lots of backhands from RF and a win for RN. Yes RF was (1.88 on here) favourite at their last meeting in Indian Wells.
presumably on that basis, teo, a player who starts the first set at 1.4 and wins 6-0 should be exactly the same odds as a player who starts the first set at 1.9 and wins 6-0 in the first set.
presumably on that basis, teo, a player who starts the first set at 1.4 and wins 6-0 should be exactly the same odds as a player who starts the first set at 1.9 and wins 6-0 in the first set.
Think what you like teo813, but the prematch markets have hours and hours to be set and are extremely accurate. The in play markets can represent "value" because the market has so little time to correct itself.
Think what you like teo813, but the prematch markets have hours and hours to be set and are extremely accurate. The in play markets can represent "value" because the market has so little time to correct itself.
It shouldnt SoA but sometimes it happens and there is a reason for that. I just mean that you cant trade the market based 100% on maths and you all know it, especially in tennis which is a game between two individuals.
Starting odds mean a lot more in team games like basketball, cricket etc
It shouldnt SoA but sometimes it happens and there is a reason for that.I just mean that you cant trade the market based 100% on maths and you all know it, especially in tennis which is a game between two individuals.Starting odds mean a lot more in
Starting odds mean very little in cricket. In tennis, the profit line almost exactly matches the probability line on a graph of odds v results, so I would say that tennis is the most accurately priced sport.
Starting odds mean very little in cricket. In tennis, the profit line almost exactly matches the probability line on a graph of odds v results, so I would say that tennis is the most accurately priced sport.
just unlucky on that 30-30 fed on 2nd set, 4all, but today's roger is far the better of last months, and competitive as he's been ever against rafa (10-20H2H)
just unlucky on that 30-30 fed on 2nd set, 4all, but today's roger is far the better of last months, and competitive as he's been ever against rafa (10-20H2H)
there will be a bit of crowd pleasing too people want to see their own guy in finals, milos reached montreal finals while isner will reach cincy finals but will lose to rafa like milos did.
there will be a bit of crowd pleasing too people want to see their own guy in finals, milos reached montreal finals while isner will reach cincy finals but will lose to rafa like milos did.