Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 293 comments are related to the topic:
BARTOLI V FLIPKENS
BARTOLI V FLIPKENS
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 293
|
By:
I have said that there is nothing wrong with criticising players on Twitter.
|
|
By:
you did, can't remember when you suggested the forum give someone stick on twitter
|
|
By:
Yes, I probably said something like 'tell them what you think' which does not amount to abuse or death threats.
|
|
By:
ok sorry fair enough
|
|
By:
Bartoli will be wanting Lisicki to win the semi final for sure.
|
|
By:
I dont think she has ever beaten Radwanska.
|
|
By:
Equal pay does seem a little strange? Playing for shorter periods to a lower absolute level, attracting lower ticket prices (apparently?), less viewers and less sponsorhip? It's Political Correctness Gone MAD!
   Maybe they should both get 2/3 of the prize money up front, then winner of the mens should play the winner of the womens for the remaining 2/6 (1/3)? That would be fair  ?Also it would give lisicki more TV time, so, everbody wins  |
|
By:
Lisicki drifting?
|
|
By:
I dont see why women should not play five sets.
|
|
By:
they could play 5 sets in the semi final and final. That would be enough and might give the crowd their money's worth
|
|
By:
Have all you Flipkens punters seen that you couldn't tell a Champ from a Chump......?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
And if I remember correctly you said the other day that you called someone a fixer on twitter recently. That is very much abuse as your idea of a fixer is not exactly solid.
|
|
By:
she's very nice, gets a lot of undeserved stick about her figure but it's irrelevant. she's fit enough to compete at this level
Absolutely. Besides she must play at least 4 sets every match with the amount of air shots she hits  |