radawanska

http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/players/overview/wta316959.html

http://form.tennis.betfair.com/

Cheers lads....makes things much easier than having to read through a pile of pish.

Hard to believe she doesn't meet a seeded player for a few matches yet, this girl could surely not have had an easier path. Will still be backing that 16 year old in next match, no way she can play as badly as Johannson.

keys is actually decent on grass but its hard to see her hit through aggy as easy as she has so far

Not that much of a follower on tennis, but do enjoy a flutter in the big comps. I was a bit surprised to see her seeded 4th considering what I just watched, never seen this young girl before but will be backing her.

Keys is a powerful hitter but clumsy on grass, she can beat a spraying type player like Li or Ivanovic but Aga will surely just be too consistent and crafty for her, as well as making too few errors.

Aga in terrible form though, doesn't deserve to go deep here but the draw pretty much assures her that.

Jun 27, 2013 -- 6:14PM, stroodle wrote:

Hard to believe she doesn't meet a seeded player for a few matches yet, this girl could surely not have had an easier path. Will still be backing that 16 year old in next match, no way she can play as badly as Johannson.

every player has same amount of seeded players in the draw, barhel lost to keys she was seeded and petrova also lost and pawluchenkowa

* shes seeded 4th btw if you still not get it

What sort of price would you think this match would be priced at? 4th seed v school leaver...

Aga 1.3

1.45

Obviously the young girl is decent with odds like that....was thinking maybe 1.2 for radawanska considering she has previously reached the final I think.

Keys is a future talent

http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/scores/draws/ms/msdraw.pdf - MEN

http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/scores/draws/ws/wsdraw.pdf - WOMEN

HERE YOU GO PAL FULL BRACKET TO SEE WHO PLAYS WHO

radwanska will play way more aggressive and on higher level against keys, today she just walked past

Wouldn't care if she was a cart horse, I will be backing her next match. Radawnska was fukcing shocking in that last match, can't serve, and was handed that match by a clueless Johannson who was so really bad, 100 unforced errors and could easily have won that match with a quarter of a brain.

Radawnska seems a nice girl, but must be one of the worst top 10 players in the history of tennis.

Hasn't got a winning shot in her body and amazed if she could win a match down the local club. Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour

Jun 27, 2013 -- 7:01PM, pedrobob wrote:

Radawnska seems a nice girl, but must be one of the worst top 10 players in the history of tennis.Hasn't got a winning shot in her body and amazed if she could win a match down the local club. Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour

Would have to agree with you there, I was under the impression the higher the seed the better the player...... can someone convince me that Radawanska is a better player than Lisicki....4th seed v about 32seed     Radawanska would get lashed if both were on song.

Radwanska mightn't have weapons, but she wins matches by making less mistakes and bringing out errors in her opponents. i'd fancy her to beat lisicki for that reason and because she has a stronger head than lisicki. Lisicki's head can go missing in a flash.

Jun 27, 2013 -- 7:01PM, pedrobob wrote:

Radawnska seems a nice girl, but must be one of the worst top 10 players in the history of tennis.Hasn't got a winning shot in her body and amazed if she could win a match down the local club. Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour

lol what a clueless post

That's not what I said, if both were playing at the top of there game I could only see one winner, and that would be Lisicki. This was only mentioned because of  the difference in the seeding between both, genuinely can't see how this girl could be ranked 4th with what I watched today.......maybe a really bad day at the office and she is a lot better than today's performance, but I wouldn't put a sausage on her against anyone after watching today.

Aga wasn't great today

the idea some of that if someone doesn't hit the ball as hard as possible then they have no weapons is a bit odd

Again not what I'm saying, didn't mention Lisicki only because she can smash the ball she pretty tasty also Its just you cannot see Radawanska even getting a sniff from Serina....but you can visualize Lisicki giving her a game

well if serena would come up to matches against rad as motivated as against lisicki likes, there would be different result last year final for sure

Jun 27, 2013 -- 7:40PM, stroodle wrote:

Again not what I'm saying, didn't mention Lisicki only because she can smash the ball she pretty tasty also  Its just you cannot see Radawanska even getting a sniff from Serina....but you can visualize Lisicki giving her a game

see post I'm quoting

aaron, the only weapon she has is of the brick wall variety. Just wears and bores her rivals into submission.
If she had a match with a twin sister, a 3 set match would last about 5 days

Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour

there is still plenty of people on this earth  mystified with rising sun

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304211804577502780985880106.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Radwanska scored a routine win Monday, 6-2, 6-3 over Camila Giorgi, and will play Maria Kirilenko in Tuesday's quarterfinals. She hit 11 winners—Giorgi hit 28—and made just six errors to Giorgi's 30. She displayed her entire repertoire of spins, slice forehands, flick lobs and angles. Radwanska's favorite shot is the forehand squat. As a line drive approaches, she bends low as if she's about to sit on the court, absorbs her opponent's power and returns it with remarkable accuracy.

Following

Andy MurrayVerified account
‏@andy_murray
Radwanska has the best lob in tennis!

Radwanska has the best lob in tennis Why does she not just lob it over the net on her serve, she might do better

aga has whole repertoire of great shots , dont want to even drag about it. doestn mean when she plays like shyt she is making them,pretty the same as anyone else, but"they trying to hit winners at lest"  . against kirilenko 36 winners 22 errors, against kerber 20 winners 6 errors against vesnina 16 winners 0 errors , against mouseburger last round 17 winners 8 errors

Jun 27, 2013 -- 8:04PM, stroodle wrote:

Radwanska has the best lob in tennis Why does she not just lob it over the net on her serve, she might do better

your tennis knowledge is pathetic why not you just shout up lol . federer has best serve in tennis why he not hit serve when casing the ball

why he does not hit serve when chasing the ball*

serena against minela 25 winners 12 errors

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8KvrhP1DtE

Some numbers are useless. You know very well (as a fan i assume) Rad doesn't hit that much groundstrokes winners and is very bad at finishing points aka creating her own pace.

well she hit soprt of  simmilar today was shadowed by her muggish lethargic performance thou

Jun 27, 2013 -- 8:06PM, ;[p wrote:

Jun 27, 2013 --  8:04PM, stroodle wrote:Radwanska has the best lob in tennis Why does she not just lob it over the net on her serve, she might do betteryour tennis knowledge is pathetic why not you just shout up lol . federer has best serve in tennis why he not hit serve when casing the ball

Agree....quite a novice in this sport, but don't rate Radawanska as 4th seed after watching her today, and willing to back it up with a punt on her next opponent whoever that maybe.

because you didnt dsee her playing well maybe

aronh its on bebs now maybe there will be that shot which was simmilar to flipkens one

4th seed means she is no4 in rankings not that she is the actual 4th best player. Not saying she does not deserve no4 but i don't think she ever was 4th favorite by odds to win a slam. Lol for some time Wozniacki was number 1 and like 10th favorite to win slams

victor has her priced 1/4 Keys 3/1

radwanska is not player who dominate opponent physically lol if you rate players by that u are loser in tennis. shes dominating opponents  by tactical understanding of this game and ability to execute it via whole range of shots also her accuracy  quickness great movement and anticipation , when she is playing well her power is not strength only accuracy and depth of the shots. obviously when she is playing shytty she looks very vulnerable  just  because she has no power and strength mask some players hide behind even they losing constantly. she was lacking depth today but tbh when she wanted she was founding her shots played like 20% of ability or lower , if she would play well she would double bagel Mathilde with her performance . rad weaknesses are her second serve which is not that vulnerable on grass due to slice factor, and she ,strangely, lack of belief, she seems to be mentally strong against players she is comfortable against therefore this weakness is is little bit masked, but is big issue against some  she feel vulnerable against . and mentality is huge part in tennis

Jun 27, 2013 -- 8:37PM, ;[p wrote:

radwanska is not player who dominate opponent physically lol if you rate players by that u are loser in tennis. shes dominating opponents  by tactical understanding of this game and ability to execute it via whole range of shots also her accuracy  quickness great movement and anticipation , when she is playing well her power is not strength only accuracy and depth of the shots. obviously when she is playing shytty she looks very vulnerable  just  because she has no power and strength mask some players hide behind even they losing constantly. she was lacking depth today but tbh when she wanted she was founding her shots played like 20% of ability or lower , if she would play well she would double bagel Mathilde with her performance . rad weaknesses are her second serve which is not that vulnerable on grass due to slice factor, and she ,strangely, lack of belief, she seems to be mentally strong against players she is comfortable against therefore this weakness is is little bit masked, but is big issue against some  she feel vulnerable against . and mentality is huge part in tennis

>

Jun 27, 2013 -- 8:37PM, ;[p wrote:

radwanska is not player who dominate opponent physically lol if you rate players by that u are loser in tennis. shes dominating opponents

match against keys, im not sure if keys is consistent enough during the rallies she can brak down if thers bit of an ball on rte run or footwork is not there , radwanska struggle against players who can sustain rally like obviously  aza serena or player like sloane for example or her nemesis cetkovsa or kuzzy etc, therefore if aga play her normal game be motivated she should win this  if it will not be somehow unlucky at the beginning where she will get  5 breakpoints in one game and wont take it etc should win this  normally.

pironkova possible next round encounter is more difficult as piro like to hit ball quickly down on the knees nad can rally as well on grass therefore she is very dangerous grass courter. this will be tricky even aga will play normal ,she will need to play good stuff

Do you think the 1/4 quoted by victor is about right against a school leaver, or is to short?

about right

will be 1,4ish and its about right

Jun 27, 2013 -- 9:17PM, ;[p wrote:

will be 1,4ish and its about right

Victor has her at 1.25 are you saying 1.4 is about right, rather than 1/4

what they have keys on

... and therefore...

3/1  4.00

Keys 2.32 to back on here

looks value

never noticed price on this match here, was checking around a few just found victor.

was an incredibly illiquid market

will see tomorrow how it forms really