|
By:
http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/players/overview/wta316959.html
|
|
By:
http://form.tennis.betfair.com/
|
|
By:
Cheers lads....makes things much easier than having to read through a pile of pish.
|
|
By:
Hard to believe she doesn't meet a seeded player for a few matches yet, this girl could surely not have had an easier path. Will still be backing that 16 year old in next match, no way she can play as badly as Johannson.
|
|
By:
keys is actually decent on grass but its hard to see her hit through aggy as easy as she has so far
|
|
By:
Not that much of a follower on tennis, but do enjoy a flutter in the big comps. I was a bit surprised to see her seeded 4th considering what I just watched, never seen this young girl before but will be backing her.
|
|
By:
Keys is a powerful hitter but clumsy on grass, she can beat a spraying type player like Li or Ivanovic but Aga will surely just be too consistent and crafty for her, as well as making too few errors.
Aga in terrible form though, doesn't deserve to go deep here but the draw pretty much assures her that. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
* shes seeded 4th btw if you still not get it
|
|
By:
What sort of price would you think this match would be priced at? 4th seed v school leaver...
|
|
By:
Aga 1.3
|
|
By:
1.45
|
|
By:
Obviously the young girl is decent with odds like that....was thinking maybe 1.2 for radawanska considering she has previously reached the final I think.
|
|
By:
Keys is a future talent
|
|
By:
http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/scores/draws/ms/msdraw.pdf - MEN
http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/scores/draws/ws/wsdraw.pdf - WOMEN HERE YOU GO PAL FULL BRACKET TO SEE WHO PLAYS WHO |
|
By:
radwanska will play way more aggressive and on higher level against keys, today she just walked past
|
|
By:
Wouldn't care if she was a cart horse, I will be backing her next match. Radawnska was fukcing shocking in that last match, can't serve, and was handed that match by a clueless Johannson who was so really bad, 100 unforced errors and could easily have won that match with a quarter of a brain.
|
|
By:
Radawnska seems a nice girl, but must be one of the worst top 10 players in the history of tennis.
Hasn't got a winning shot in her body and amazed if she could win a match down the local club. Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Radwanska mightn't have weapons, but she wins matches by making less mistakes and bringing out errors in her opponents. i'd fancy her to beat lisicki for that reason and because she has a stronger head than lisicki. Lisicki's head can go missing in a flash.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
That's not what I said, if both were playing at the top of there game I could only see one winner, and that would be Lisicki. This was only mentioned because of the difference in the seeding between both, genuinely can't see how this girl could be ranked 4th with what I watched today.......maybe a really bad day at the office and she is a lot better than today's performance, but I wouldn't put a sausage on her against anyone after watching today.
|
|
By:
Aga wasn't great today
the idea some of that if someone doesn't hit the ball as hard as possible then they have no weapons is a bit odd |
|
By:
Again not what I'm saying, didn't mention Lisicki only because she can smash the ball she pretty tasty also
Its just you cannot see Radawanska even getting a sniff from Serina....but you can visualize Lisicki giving her a game |
|
By:
well if serena would come up to matches against rad as motivated as against lisicki likes, there would be different result last year final for sure
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
aaron, the only weapon she has is of the brick wall variety. Just wears and bores her rivals into submission.
If she had a match with a twin sister, a 3 set match would last about 5 days |
|
By:
Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour
there is still plenty of people on this earth mystified with rising sun |
|
By:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304211804577502780985880106.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Radwanska scored a routine win Monday, 6-2, 6-3 over Camila Giorgi, and will play Maria Kirilenko in Tuesday's quarterfinals. She hit 11 winners—Giorgi hit 28—and made just six errors to Giorgi's 30. She displayed her entire repertoire of spins, slice forehands, flick lobs and angles. Radwanska's favorite shot is the forehand squat. As a line drive approaches, she bends low as if she's about to sit on the court, absorbs her opponent's power and returns it with remarkable accuracy. ![]() |
|
By:
Following
Andy MurrayVerified account @andy_murray Radwanska has the best lob in tennis! ![]() |
|
By:
Radwanska has the best lob in tennis
Why does she not just lob it over the net on her serve, she might do better![]() |
|
By:
aga has whole repertoire of great shots , dont want to even drag about it. doestn mean when she plays like shyt she is making them,pretty the same as anyone else, but"they trying to hit winners at lest" . against kirilenko 36 winners 22 errors, against kerber 20 winners 6 errors against vesnina 16 winners 0 errors , against mouseburger last round 17 winners 8 errors |
|
By:
|
|
By:
why he does not hit serve when chasing the ball*
|
|
By:
serena against minela 25 winners 12 errors
|
|
By:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8KvrhP1DtE
|
|
By:
Some numbers are useless. You know very well (as a fan i assume) Rad doesn't hit that much groundstrokes winners and is very bad at finishing points aka creating her own pace.
|