Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
stroodle
27 Jun 13 17:37
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Sep 10
| Topic/replies: 7,803 | Blogger: stroodle's blog
Been trying to find the womens draw online, your hoping that you can just click on a page and it shows you the whole draw and who plays who if they proceed, but no every site so far just endless drivel about who has a chance in this draw or that. Looking for Radawanska next opponent, as I feel she is more than likely going to be fav, and to be honest been watching her just now in her match with Johanson and she is playing rubbish but winning comfortably because Johanson is useless. Who is she playing next so I can read a bit about player?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 59
By:
mouse trap
When: 27 Jun 13 17:44
http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/players/overview/wta316959.html
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 17:45
http://form.tennis.betfair.com/
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 18:00
Cheers lads....makes things much easier than having to read through a pile of pish.
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 18:14
Hard to believe she doesn't meet a seeded player for a few matches yet, this girl could surely not have had an easier path. Will still be backing that 16 year old in next match, no way she can play as badly as Johannson.
By:
The Bhoys
When: 27 Jun 13 18:17
keys is actually decent on grass but its hard to see her hit through aggy as easy as she has so far
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 18:27
Not that much of a follower on tennis, but do enjoy a flutter in the big comps. I was a bit surprised to see her seeded 4th considering what I just watched, never seen this young girl before but will be backing her.
By:
smb360
When: 27 Jun 13 18:29
Keys is a powerful hitter but clumsy on grass, she can beat a spraying type player like Li or Ivanovic but Aga will surely just be too consistent and crafty for her, as well as making too few errors.

Aga in terrible form though, doesn't deserve to go deep here but the draw pretty much assures her that.
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 18:29

Jun 27, 2013 -- 6:14PM, stroodle wrote:


Hard to believe she doesn't meet a seeded player for a few matches yet, this girl could surely not have had an easier path. Will still be backing that 16 year old in next match, no way she can play as badly as Johannson.


every player has same amount of seeded players in the draw, barhel lost to keys she was seeded and petrova also lost and pawluchenkowa

By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 18:30
* shes seeded 4th btw if you still not get it
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 18:36
What sort of price would you think this match would be priced at? 4th seed v school leaver...
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 18:37
Aga 1.3
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 18:37
1.45
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 18:41
Obviously the young girl is decent with odds like that....was thinking maybe 1.2 for radawanska considering she has previously reached the final I think.
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 18:41
Keys is a future talent
By:
Beaniash
When: 27 Jun 13 18:43
http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/scores/draws/ms/msdraw.pdf - MEN

http://www.wimbledon.com/en_GB/scores/draws/ws/wsdraw.pdf - WOMEN

HERE YOU GO PAL FULL BRACKET TO SEE WHO PLAYS WHO
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 18:45
radwanska will play way more aggressive and on higher level against keys, today she just walked past
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 18:48
Wouldn't care if she was a cart horse, I will be backing her next match. Radawnska was fukcing shocking in that last match, can't serve, and was handed that match by a clueless Johannson who was so really bad, 100 unforced errors and could easily have won that match with a quarter of a brain.
By:
pedrobob
When: 27 Jun 13 19:01
Radawnska seems a nice girl, but must be one of the worst top 10 players in the history of tennis.

Hasn't got a winning shot in her body and amazed if she could win a match down the local club. Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 19:02
Laugh
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 19:08

Jun 27, 2013 -- 7:01PM, pedrobob wrote:


Radawnska seems a nice girl, but must be one of the worst top 10 players in the history of tennis.Hasn't got a winning shot in her body and amazed if she could win a match down the local club. Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour


Would have to agree with you there, I was under the impression the higher the seed the better the player...... can someone convince me that Radawanska is a better player than Lisicki....4th seed v about 32seed     Radawanska would get lashed if both were on song.

By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 19:10
LaughLaugh
By:
lurka
When: 27 Jun 13 19:17
Radwanska mightn't have weapons, but she wins matches by making less mistakes and bringing out errors in her opponents. i'd fancy her to beat lisicki for that reason and because she has a stronger head than lisicki. Lisicki's head can go missing in a flash.
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 19:20

Jun 27, 2013 -- 7:01PM, pedrobob wrote:


Radawnska seems a nice girl, but must be one of the worst top 10 players in the history of tennis.Hasn't got a winning shot in her body and amazed if she could win a match down the local club. Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour


lol what a clueless post

By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 19:26
That's not what I said, if both were playing at the top of there game I could only see one winner, and that would be Lisicki. This was only mentioned because of  the difference in the seeding between both, genuinely can't see how this girl could be ranked 4th with what I watched today.......maybe a really bad day at the office and she is a lot better than today's performance, but I wouldn't put a sausage on her against anyone after watching today.
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 19:33
Aga wasn't great today

the idea some of that if someone doesn't hit the ball as hard as possible then they have no weapons is a bit odd
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 19:40
Again not what I'm saying, didn't mention Lisicki only because she can smash the ball she pretty tasty also Love Its just you cannot see Radawanska even getting a sniff from Serina....but you can visualize Lisicki giving her a game
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 19:42
well if serena would come up to matches against rad as motivated as against lisicki likes, there would be different result last year final for sure
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 19:42

Jun 27, 2013 -- 7:40PM, stroodle wrote:


Again not what I'm saying, didn't mention Lisicki only because she can smash the ball she pretty tasty also  Its just you cannot see Radawanska even getting a sniff from Serina....but you can visualize Lisicki giving her a game


see post I'm quoting Wink

By:
pedrobob
When: 27 Jun 13 19:48
aaron, the only weapon she has is of the brick wall variety. Just wears and bores her rivals into submission.
If she had a match with a twin sister, a 3 set match would last about 5 days
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 19:54
Hence continually mystified and stupefied into how she manages it on the women's tour

there is still plenty of people on this earth  mystified with rising sun
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 19:56
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304211804577502780985880106.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Radwanska scored a routine win Monday, 6-2, 6-3 over Camila Giorgi, and will play Maria Kirilenko in Tuesday's quarterfinals. She hit 11 winners—Giorgi hit 28—and made just six errors to Giorgi's 30. She displayed her entire repertoire of spins, slice forehands, flick lobs and angles. Radwanska's favorite shot is the forehand squat. As a line drive approaches, she bends low as if she's about to sit on the court, absorbs her opponent's power and returns it with remarkable accuracy.

Cool
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 19:59
Following

Andy MurrayVerified account
‏@andy_murray
Radwanska has the best lob in tennis!
Shocked
By:
stroodle
When: 27 Jun 13 20:04
Radwanska has the best lob in tennisLaugh Why does she not just lob it over the net on her serve, she might do betterWink
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 20:04
Coolaga has whole repertoire of great shots , dont want to even drag about it. doestn mean when she plays like shyt she is making them,pretty the same as anyone else, but"they trying to hit winners at lest"  . against kirilenko 36 winners 22 errors, against kerber 20 winners 6 errors against vesnina 16 winners 0 errors , against mouseburger last round 17 winners 8 errors
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 20:06

Jun 27, 2013 -- 8:04PM, stroodle wrote:


Radwanska has the best lob in tennis Why does she not just lob it over the net on her serve, she might do better


your tennis knowledge is pathetic why not you just shout up lol . federer has best serve in tennis why he not hit serve when casing the ballConfused

By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 20:06
why he does not hit serve when chasing the ball*
By:
;[p
When: 27 Jun 13 20:08
serena against minela 25 winners 12 errors
By:
aaronh
When: 27 Jun 13 20:10
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8KvrhP1DtE
By:
chilipepper
When: 27 Jun 13 20:12
Some numbers are useless. You know very well (as a fan i assume) Rad doesn't hit that much groundstrokes winners and is very bad at finishing points aka creating her own pace.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com