Fed 7.2 to win wimbledon

because Djokovoic, Nadal and even Murray have the ability to beat him. And the likes of Tsonga and Berdych can shock him too

If Nadal is in his quater, he won't be worth 72 let alone 7.2

Struggled past Youzhny in the final and Haas tested him.

Only currently 6 in the race and has alot of points coming up to defend.

Could be seeded out of the top 4 for the first time in a decade come US open time!

grass is certainly his best and probably his only chance of a slam. He beat Djok & murray to win it last yr but he was in much better form last year, won 4 tourneys before wimbledon, beat nadal and murray on the way. Halle is his first win this year and he has lost to murray and nadal (twice) when he has met them this year. he hasn't played djok this year but he is a year older and i think all 3 of them would have the mental edge over him now and are physically stronger too. That's why his price is higher.

I don't think his body will be able for nadal physically this year if they meet. But i think he will be in tip top shape and give it his best shot as he knows it's his best chance, so you never know. Still wouldn't back him at 7.2 tho. Why don't you wait and get him higher during the tournament? what price did he hit last year 2 sets down v Benneteau?

I think he must change his style a bit and attack more with his forehand after he is serving. I think he tried to do that more often in Halle. In my eyes when he serves väl and he is aggressive with his FH and he dosnt make to many UE, than he has the edge than the rest. His BH which normally is his weaker side is in grass a alternative weapon. Djokovic dosnt move as well on grass and movement and the returns is his biggest strenght the way i see it. Nadal will always be a doubt. He didnt even play on grass yet. And Nadal usually  struggles against big servers especially when the grass is faster in the early rounds. But Nadal is very dangerous when fitt and goes deep in grand slams but still I think Nadal was at his peak in 2008 when he defeated Federer in 5 sets. Think Murray will be the greatest threat to Federer if Murray dosnt lose to Nadal before.

should be same price as tsonga

Because market is taking recent results as a big warning sign that he may be finished. He won Halle, but was hardly impressive in the process.

mugs can now have 9.2

Problem he has Nadal in the quarters. Given recent form the odds may be Nadal 1.50, Fed 3.00 or thereabouts. That is why his price at 9 is still a huge lay.

I dont think Nadal will have 1.5 against Fed. He will be at least 2

If Nadal is in the zone the he will tough to beat but I cant see him playing like he did in 2008. Also his spinn is not so effective on grass. He is vulnrable in early his has a good drav in early ronds. He use to struggle with big servers. But i thing many more players today knows how to beat Nadal than before. He hasnt the same auroa than before.

Isner

Agree, but big servers usully are bad movers and bad returners. In Halle and London, the big servers havent made big impact. I think a slice serve is very effective on grass. So when serving, placement and the right spinn on the ball is more effectful than pure power.

Isner never made it past the second round here

^^ in the early rounds of course

mugs got punished

who knew?