Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 932 comments are related to the topic:
Miami 21/03 WTA R2, ATP R1
Miami 21/03 WTA R2, ATP R1
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 932
|
By:
Something strange here.
Hsieh SP 19 - but 4-1 down 13.5? |
|
By:
Traded at 1.03 already but current price 1.07 does look dodgy
|
|
By:
Cetkovska has a little thing over her, it wasn't one off. starts painting lines for two hours with it too. confidence or something.
|
|
By:
no movement at all. not to mention the loads of money
|
|
By:
It probably just means she has strapping on.
|
|
By:
Yes, their meeting last year was unbelievable. I don't think I've ever seen such accurate hitting in the WTA as from Cetkovska in that match.
|
|
By:
must be a lot of strapping then. and visible during morning practice
|
|
By:
not just their last meeting smb
 |
|
By:
Surely someone on twitter is tweeting from this match.
|
|
By:
Interesting performance from Istomin.
|
|
By:
It's on the main court, it's not like it is hidden away.
|
|
By:
Can see that from h2h but that was the only one I've watched
|
|
By:
Hsieh breaks back. GAME ON!!!
|
|
By:
watched the one before it, then made shyteloads on the next
 poor Aggie, Petras... |
|
By:
Just noticed Rochus is losing despite that price plunge pre.
|
|
By:
missing Polish insider on this match
|
|
By:
I can see Piotr changing Caroline's name to Petra
 |
|
By:
Radwanska isn't going to tank the match ffs. If she does she loses 995 ranking points.
|
|
By:
people can be actually injured you know?
|
|
By:
no one said anything about tanking. or i missed it
|
|
By:
Radwa will beat Hsieh with 1 arm tied behind her back and her feet tied together.
|
|
By:
hahaha
|
|
By:
and blindfoled
|
|
By:
If you are going to invest a random injury, how about I just spin it the other way.
Players can win when like 40% fit fine. |
|
By:
*invent
|
|
By:
pile on then
|
|
By:
one million before the match and nearly that much in set 1 without movement...
|
|
By:
all aboard the massive pile on
|
|
By:
come on robbie ginepri!!!
|
|
By:
This is one of the times I regret not laying the favourite more before the match not knowing the price after won 1st set would be higher
 |
|
By:
It was like 1.12 when we were discussing that but thats besides the point.
|
|
By:
http://ow.ly/i/1Jlsv match stats. Basically Hsieh is crap.
|
|
By:
it wasn't when you were discussing it with me. it was stagnated at 1.07/1.08. for quite a while too
|
|
By:
what has hsieh got to do with it?
|
|
By:
When the inital point was brought up though. Obviously the price is moving, given she broke for 5-3 the next game and then went 1.07. It's pretty much just been a complete train since then.
|
|
By:
exactly. the price however not so much
|
|
By:
Because Hsieh is not good enough to beat 50% Radwanska even if she is injured. Just like you saw Radwanska's sister not even be able to beat Azarenka unable to move last week. Just like you saw Wawrinka unable to beat injured Fed. Injury doesn't = auto loss.
|
|
By:
Did anyone lay Rochus out of interest?
|
|
By:
good point. Fed was a massive lay
|