|
By:
I'm on Squitolina now.
|
|
By:
actualy pliskova made some green when a set down vs m.sands
|
|
By:
Tournaments should be allocated based on the number of players in the top 50 or so from each country.
|
|
By:
i'm trading from one to another in svitolina
|
|
By:
So, Spain would get the most, then France and Russia etc.
|
|
By:
Then they could avoid stupid tournaments like Azerbaijan, Colombia and Morocco.
|
|
By:
Kuala Lumpur is gone you will be please to here Jin_Kazz. It has been sold to Hong Kong from next year, and will take place in September time with Na Li highly likely to headline.
Also Sharapova vs Keys/Oudin first match. |
|
By:
yeah, and money doesn't matter soa
|
|
By:
Or not. Stupid twitter. Sharapova plays Pennetta or Schiavone.
|
|
By:
So the calendar could potentially change drastically every year, and countries who have a few players rise in the rankings would suddenly have to scramble to build another three tournament venues or something.
And the WTA TOUR would become a shuttle bus over the Pyrenees and back with a couple of quick holidays to Germany and Russia. ![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
The problem with doing that is you would give those countries an even bigger competitive advantage than they already have (that's basically what they do already at futures level).
|
|
By:
svitolina
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
i like this way ,the slams a premier events by ranks,internationals for invited ones
|
|
By:
Then the other countries would have to invest in tennis to built their foothold in the game.
|
|
By:
equal green
finish this mug in 2, mighty elina! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
So promising players in less developed countries could potentially have their careers snuffed out and their talent never realised all because they have the misfortune to be born in a country where money hasn't been heavily invested in tennis.
|
|
By:
Then they should grade it. The Spanish get the bigger tournaments, the French the next etc. Money shouldnt be the factor.
|
|
By:
to have a tourney is a real investment
actually parents invest in their kids most of the time not government |
|
By:
in this days players made their foothold and when affirmed the countrys jump on them like in olympics.
|
|
By:
bouchi break for set?
|
|
By:
choke from the spanish would be nice
|
|
By:
Ancic all in panova?
|
|
By:
Dunno, I was but I got out a bit and went for Squitolina.
|
|
By:
tripple banker
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
good evening, btw
|
|
By:
more like 7-5 to elina 2nd set now
|
|
By:
break for set try 2
|
|
By:
please no tie break...my position is to good to waste all my bouchi green to svitolina
|
|
By:
thanks babe
|
|
By:
how do you do that dirk?
|
|
By:
do what?
|
|
By:
Pliskova
. |
|
By:
all this crazy sh1t when you ask for break and it happens next minute
|
|
By:
So my theory would suggest this, for ATP, for example..
Grand Slams stay the same.. but why does the USA get three Masters events? Just because of the country's population, even if tennis is not that popular? It has a Grand Slam anyway! Top 40 ranked players Spain 2 Masters events 2 ATP 500 4 ATP 250 France 2 Masters events 2 ATP 500 4 ATP 250 Serbia 1 Masters event 2 ATP 500 3 ATP 250 Argentina 1 Masters event 1 ATP 500 3 ATP 250 Germany 1 Masters event 1 ATP 500 2 ATP 250 Switzerland 1 Masters event 2 ATP 250 USA 1 Masters event 2 ATP 250 Czech 1 ATP 500 2 ATP 250 UK 1 ATP 500 1 ATP 250 Italy 1 ATP 500 1 ATP 250 Croatia 2 ATP 250 Japan 2 ATP 250 Canada 2 ATP 250 Russia 2 ATP 250 Ukraine 2 ATP 250 Poland 1 ATP 250 Slovakia 1 ATP 250 Bulgaria 1 ATP 250 Cyprus 1 ATP 250 South Africa 1 ATP 250 Brazil 1 ATP 250 |
|
By:
i guess it's luck....and a good feeling for how things may go
|
|
By:
Why does the Czech Republic not get tournaments?
|
|
By:
germany has no masters event!?
|