Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 69 comments are related to the topic:
Time violation?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 69
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 14:58
everone abusing this stupid rule because its out of sense. whats the difference if nadal abusing it longer.abuse is abuse. its ridiculous rule and its initial sence is taken out of contekst because few players serves qiucker than others and trying to gain advantage
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 14:59
errrr nadal being stopped  as well
By:
Java
When: 04 Jan 13 15:01
"errrr nadal being stopped  as well"

Malisse obviously feels that Nadal gets 45 secs when he gets 25 secs?  So if players think this because umpires are weak to the big names, then put a rule in which is fair to everyone.  Make it 45 seconds if it makes it more palatable to you Nadal fanboys.
By:
Java
When: 04 Jan 13 15:02
Anyhow - doubt Nadal will come back, but would be good to stop Djokovic bouncing the ball 10 times each point.
By:
AyersRock
When: 04 Jan 13 15:03
as java has said, give everyone the exact amount of time, be it 20 seconds, 30 or whatever but allow no advantage to anyone end of story no need  to cry its that simple.
By:
StevoDevo
When: 04 Jan 13 15:06
It is pure gamesmanship by the top guys that do it. Why wouldn't they if the umpire doesn't pick them up on it?

Is it fair that the top guys can do it and get away with it and lower ranked players can't? Prob not.
By:
StevoDevo
When: 04 Jan 13 15:09
No need to be a Nadal hater Java.

Rafa most certainly WILL be back at some stage. And look out once he regains match fitness!
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 15:37
exactly why not take average of 100 players add 5 seconds and then make rule? only using average time of federer .because tv is pushing for it and trnnis fans shouldn't fall into it. no changes is the best way.

on thevother hand why not tell federer to wait 25 seconds before he serve so his opponent can get composure back?

lol the one who has ball should dictate  and thats it

btw im old man notva fanboy,dont know even why its going on around nadal somehow,only because of haters i think
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 15:40
and lets stop this advantage- disadvantage bullsjt going on on this matter.everybody has the same. want to serve quick, serve quick but dont cry when on receiving end ffs
By:
wasu
When: 04 Jan 13 15:42
this rule can only be fair if there is a time clock.

without time clock players won't be aware when they cross their time limit.
By:
bb66
When: 04 Jan 13 16:09
there was no change of the rule, only it is now more strictly enforced! rule is rule and has to be enforced, otherwise it's useless and should be skipped. I'm happy if it is enforced.
By:
AyersRock
When: 04 Jan 13 16:18
lol nadal fanboys very upset clearly, well done atp
By:
DonNo1
When: 04 Jan 13 17:01
Time clock is a ridiculous idea, it's irritating when commentators suggest it likes it's the perfect solution.  Allowances have to be made..for longer points, longer crowd cheering, player slipping over etc.  Just leave it to the discretion of the umpire, it's clear when someone is abusing the rule and deliberately taking longer (like Nadal every match).

Regardless nobody has had a point penalty yet have they?  Nobody will, not in a big match or an important stage anyway and we'll gradually shift back to where we were last season in all likelihood
By:
bb66
When: 04 Jan 13 17:04
F Lopez had a warning and lost 1st serve this week.
By:
hollywood85
When: 04 Jan 13 18:31
happened at least 3 times during berdych vs agut match...
By:
incaseof
When: 04 Jan 13 18:35
Nishi got point penalty yesterday, and it was a horrible one...first was when Dolgo changed racket off some reason Nishi got time warning he got pissed so next point he changed racket and got the second warning
By:
wasu
When: 04 Jan 13 18:44
the time warning rule has to be more specific.

because of the current discretion of the umpire arbitrariness
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 18:46
yeah that was crazy, its just causing chaos instead of bringing more order, regardless of the opinion about the matter, i just cant imagine how it will can be fairly enforced without clock,and with clock every abuse would have to be explained by upire as i cant imagine situations where it can not be bended wide longer points.

its just ridiculous situation and should be leaved as it is because clearly it cant be solved without causing many stupid situation and confusion.its not that important  after all ffs
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 18:49

Jan 4, 2013 -- 4:09PM, bb66 wrote:


there was no change of the rule, only it is now more strictly enforced! rule is rule and has to be enforced, otherwise it's useless and should be skipped. I'm happy if it is enforced.


Crazyyeah , rule doesnt have to be enforced strictly  because there is this rule,common sense needed people.for example u are clearly driven by ur hate towards nadal so anyone here shouldnt and probably not taking u serious anyways

By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 18:56
richie also got penalized today..

im telling you ,it wont last long hehe and will be swept under carpet soon again
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 19:06
monfils also was penalized ,saying that ball kid was slow with bringing him towelGrin, and at the end he said to umpire:

"I'm Black so I'm sweating more"

LaughLaughLaughLaugh


this is hilarious,actually im becoming a fan of thisGrin hell yeah,lets bring comedy on the court again
By:
bb66
When: 04 Jan 13 19:09
it's obvious Nadull has stressed the the rule violations far too much and he is the reason to enforce it more strictly. For Djoker bouncing the ball is a method of concentrating, and he has shortened the procedure over the years, while Nadull extended it more and more.

There may be exemptions on rare occasions (e.g. standing ovations, changing racket), but as a whole it should be enforced, and you get a warning 1st, so you know when to obey the rule strictly.
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 19:22
bbb666 time wise it takes twice more time to argue about penalty or warning to player and umpire that actually play the point. thANKFULLY ITS JUST A trial period for this rule being enforced harder so far doesnt look as it will last long
By:
AyersRock
When: 04 Jan 13 20:07
huh???????????


what cheeky sod has got my post removed what did I say?

All I said was that djoker bounces the ball too much he wears a hole in the ground - why would the moderator remove thatConfusedConfusedConfused
By:
bb66
When: 04 Jan 13 20:20
it's ridiculous how you argue against a rule being enforced, this mentality is the same that makes our society drown in corruption! Laws are laws and rules are rules, they have to be enforced! Once players know the rule is enforced they will obey it and there will be no reason for discussing it at length.
By:
dlarssonf
When: 04 Jan 13 20:27
bb66 ( other username rome ) can you not stick to your Hans Christian Andersen thread
By:
StevoDevo
When: 04 Jan 13 21:03
Ha, I didn't hear the Monfils comment but that's hell funny! Flicked over and saw him arguing with the match referee blaming the ball kids.
By:
bb66
When: 04 Jan 13 21:05
isn't that racism?
By:
;[p
When: 04 Jan 13 21:24
yes bb66 he was clearly racist to himself  lol


hehe monfils is a legend
By:
StevoDevo
When: 04 Jan 13 21:40
Self vilification. Code violation, Mr Monfils.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com