Tennis
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
I do not believe in Klizan.. He is awful player, spraying his FH all court..
Seppi should handle this quite easy. He likes Paris masters, every year he goes deep into this tournament and I doubt that Klizan is capable of stopping him this year.
Taken 1,52
Seppi should handle this quite easy. He likes Paris masters, every year he goes deep into this tournament and I doubt that Klizan is capable of stopping him this year.
Taken 1,52
Show More
I think he could win, but I'm not betting on this match, yet.
i really don't thing there is that much between the two players. I have backed 2.66 Klizan with a view of trading when (hopefully) he reaches 2.00
Good luck with all the bets guys....
Good luck with all the bets guys....
How can you see no difference between them?
Klizan is powerpuncher, in my eyes he plays just with his forehand power.
Seppi is all aroud player, playing with head and changing tactics depending on opponent.
Seppi is too smart for klizan. Variety is too big for Klizan to handle.
Klizan is powerpuncher, in my eyes he plays just with his forehand power.
Seppi is all aroud player, playing with head and changing tactics depending on opponent.
Seppi is too smart for klizan. Variety is too big for Klizan to handle.
Im on Istomin, Seppi and Belluci in a big stake treble on 365. Only worry is if Berlocq retires. Awful rule how if you retire your bet it void.
What an embarrassment. The guy would do well to get off court now before looks any more pathetic.
Seppi doing his usual of winning first set, and dropping the next. Booooooooooom
Market putting Seppi at bigger odds than prematch. Stupid.
I was on Seppi at 1.56 and out at 1.12. Not sure I'd want to be in the 1.03 camp. 
Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:11PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Market putting Seppi at bigger odds than prematch. Stupid.
why stupid?
Because that stats show that the first set winner is more likely to win a match, Floppy.
and maybe too because Seppi has a 17-2 record having won the first set 6-2.
but it gives the second set-winnner a swing, which moves the odds towards him or not?
Market hates Seppi something chronic. This market is either retarded, heading for a great fall or going to get a big payday.
it does usually move the odds like that, but it shouldnt.
Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:16PM, Floppy wrote:
but it gives the second set-winnner a swing, which moves the odds towards him or not?
Myth.
How can you see no difference between them?
Klizan is powerpuncher, in my eyes he plays just with his forehand power.
Seppi is all aroud player, playing with head and changing tactics depending on opponent.
Seppi is too smart for klizan. Variety is too big for Klizan to handle.
Erm - Klizan is just about to win 2-1........
Klizan is powerpuncher, in my eyes he plays just with his forehand power.
Seppi is all aroud player, playing with head and changing tactics depending on opponent.
Seppi is too smart for klizan. Variety is too big for Klizan to handle.
Erm - Klizan is just about to win 2-1........
Even if Klizan wins, it is unlikely that if you frequently bet on players whose odds switch like that, you'll end up losing money.
1.11, for one break of serve to an underdog in a deciding set. Honestly. Talk about odds that could get burnt.
Each game is different etc...
I will make my own book on the matter and if there is a discrepancy in the odds then i will get involved.
My opinion here was that Klizan was over priced and that has proved correct.
I don't want to get "tit-for-tat" key board warrior contest. Good luck with your future bets.
I will make my own book on the matter and if there is a discrepancy in the odds then i will get involved.
My opinion here was that Klizan was over priced and that has proved correct.
I don't want to get "tit-for-tat" key board warrior contest. Good luck with your future bets.
Berlocq-Istomin match started at pretty much the same time as this - perhaps a minute behind - yet still on the first set. This is nearly done in three.
Market punished there, but it would not surprise me if Seppi gives up the match on his own serve.
Some shrewd traders will be looking at some huge green books here methinks.
Agree. Just a pity the pictures are too far behind to trade more than conservatively.
what have they done with the video now ffs?
just use the B365 scoreboard... accurate and fast, as usual... i wonder why BF don't bother to have a similar one...
good strength then, but just even more lovely opps to lay Klizan
Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:51PM, TheMumbler wrote:
amazing, was Klizan rteally 1.05????
Both traded as low as 1.04. Seppi even 1.03.
you cant trust Seppi in tiebreaks though. He is such a jittery player.
4-2. Seppi has the wind behind him now, could be a factor
Oct 29, 2012 -- 12:14PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
and maybe too because Seppi has a 17-2 record having won the first set 6-2.
more absolutely USELESS stats from SoA
Oct 29, 2012 -- 11:54AM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Seppi should win this now.
regardless of the outcome of this match, there is ONCE AGAIN no way to justify the way it was played/won with stats. none.
haplessshrugged disputing basic facts again.
and I say this having money on seppi... huge red (three figures) if he loses
Oct 29, 2012 -- 1:00PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
haplessshrugged disputing basic facts again.
facts that are highly irrelevant... which you, in your deluded head use to justify your losses which make you borrow money from other players in order to feed your addiction.
I was never disputing the accuracy of your stupid stats, bud. I am disputing how you (wrongly) seem to use them to justify everything that's going on in each match... and you get it wrong more than you do right...
PHEW avoided a pretty big loss there... I be happy :)
that chip on your shoulder is going mouldy, hapless.
Don't know if I'm happy to post a semi-decent win or gutted that they were perfect trading conditions for my strategy but couldn't do so because of very slow pictures.
Betfair suspend monkey such a ****g mug. What if that ball that Klizan challenged was in fact in. Than the idiot had it already suspended. I wanted to trade out ffs. Do they only hire people who have an iq below 50?
Oct 29, 2012 -- 1:02PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
that chip on your shoulder is going mouldy, hapless.
not sure what chip you are talking about, schirchapan-or-iranian-shirtless-men
as I, and Darlo Bantam, mentioned, the odds were wrong in that match at various stages.
my 101 times larger bank since two weeks ago says everything about stats and how effective they can be.
Oct 29, 2012 -- 1:04PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
my 101 times larger bank since two weeks ago says everything about stats and how effective they can be.
is that why you have to borrow 1000 euros from people on betfair to bet? Because your bank is 101 times larger? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
i mean, really, 1000 euros, even Wonga won't give you that? hahaha
it was a double choke from Klizan in the third set
poor mug
poor mug
no no, it was as per So-iranian-shirtless-men's prediction.. he knew all along, especially when klizan served for the match in the third set, or when he was 5-2 up in the TB... he definitely knew, the stats told him that...
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539