Raonic vs Niemen

when i mean surface i mean court

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! BREAKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

niemen is on abouslute fire out there!

still very good odds for the fin out there

Taking 1.99 with pleasure on Raonic !

your a mug

he cant rely on his serve on thsi court

Milos free mummy here. Jarko is a big mug !

double break incoming!

ranic being found out for how **** he is

5k on Raonic 1.99, let's see what happens:)

now im a bit worried

raonic playing a a bit better

0-30 and then 4 points in a row, Jarkko grown some baws.

risky match here to punt on

we all know that mug niemen wont keep this level up

that is the worry

what a mug niemen! chance there for two break points

set point gone for janko! clown

now comes the janko choke

serving for the set

Raonic................ for somebody who is supposed to be the next big thing in men's tennis he is very poor. Great serve but take that away and he is clueless!

he is utter ****

ive seen it all now!

PMSL!

has anyone seen these shots from ranoic?

guy aint getting a first serve in

and now has missed two sitters

wow

ive seen it all

In 5/10 years time tennis going to be crap if Raonic is the crap coming thru

this guy at the net

give me more on Raonic 3 !!! Thanks

defence from niemen is just too good

playing like nadal

did Farki faint yet?

his serve just isnt effective on this surfac

cant ermember the last time he served an ace

LOL! Raonic.................... he is joining the clown section of ATP with Istomin and Monfils!

this guy niemen has the worst serve in the world! how the hell can he go two sets

without getting broken

u suspect when raonic is 4-3 or 5-4 up he will break this fin

better from ranoic here. This is exactly like the ramos vs nishi match! if raonic breaks him then niemen will crumble

it is choke time for Jarko !

jarko holding his back there

injury perhaps?

how  did this knut manage to win set 1 with break in game 2?

niemen starting to paly **** now

might be injured, he was grabbing his back in the last game

nimenen serving an ace? lol! WTF

wtf is that

****.

fk me thats bad

this is poor, can't belive ive back him

For a journeyman player he is holding up well here Niemenen! Raonic still clueless!

C'mon Jarkko, FINNISH him

i cant handle a tb.

love the hype with raonic, awful player yet everyone loves him

clueless mug: http://mitglied.multimania.de/tvlexikon/Kickers5.jpg

absolutely delightful from sharko, seeing him just fukc with the robot's head.... i just love it when players like raonic and isner get completely torn a new a$$ with cheap shots/silly serves, mocking them

Why does everyone think this useless Canadian Slug is going to be the next big thing - he is ****!!! Every time it is put up to him he slithers out of sight - last time I am ever going near a match that he is involved in as he is so unpredictable

Yeah love it...put in his place...

ie the dumptruck!

he isn't complete crap, he is made from the same mold as isner, having little beyond a big serve... by comparison to dimitrov or tomic, who were mighty impressive this week, he doesn't hold a candle

Sep 28, 2012 -- 4:33PM, doridoru wrote:

Yeah love it...put in his place...ie the dumptruck!

lol

Well played Niemenen, just goes to show if you put the ball back into play the likes of Raonic have no idea!

Well played Niemenen, just goes to show if you put the ball back into play the likes of Raonic have no idea!

I just got screwed. Put a 100 on Nemo at $5 and won but then I checked account statement after little change to balance and saw I won that bet but lost almost 400 on a lay bet of nemo of 98 @ $5.06...thing is I never made a lay bet!! and never make bets of 98 bux! and never make lay bets!

Sep 28, 2012 -- 4:56PM, wooky wrote:

I just got screwed. Put a 100 on Nemo at $5 and won but then I checked account statement after little change to balance and saw I won that bet but lost almost 400 on a lay bet of nemo of 98 @ $5.06...thing is I never made a lay bet!! and never make bets of 98 bux! and never make lay bets!

you must have done it by mistake

Only remember doing the nemo win bet..plus the lay bet had a stake of 98.04...I definately never made a bet with an amount that specific

dude, you may have laid 100 and only 98.04 got matched, and the rest was never cancelled... just look in the history of bets you placed and when you placed them... to avoid such mistakes, that's why i use the double confirmation feature

an email from betfair suggests it may have something to do with using the cashout feature. I originally had 100 on raonic but cashed that out a few minutes after making the win bet on nemo. So i got 94 back from the raonic win bet cash out..according to my account statement the lay bet on nemo occurred at the same minute as the raonic cash out. How does a $94 cashout turn into a $98 lay of nemo?

email from betfair:

Thank you for your e-mail.

Please be advised when you use the 'Cash Out' function you are able to lock in a profit or loss before waiting for the match to finish. Betfair do the math to offer you a value in real time of your current bets based on the live market prices.

Please be advised the 'Cash Out' feature does not cancel your bets; instead it does the opposite of your position. For example if you 'Cash Out' on a back bet it will place a lay bet, and if you 'Cash Out' on a lay bet it will place a back bet.

In your instance you placed a back bet on Raonic at odds of 1.2 for a $100 stake. Approximately three hours later you placed a back bet on Nieminen at odds of 5 for $100. After you placed the back bet on Nieminen you elected to 'Cash Out'.

This 'Cash Out' function then applied to both of your back bets in this market. This means the back bets on Raonic and Nieminen had lay bets applied to them. While you may have not manually put lay bets on, because you chose to 'Cash Out' the system automatically placed them.



Am I the only that was unaware of this? you cash out and automatically it makes a lay bet??

haha... are you serious?? you used the cash out function without knowing what it does?? WOW. secondly, why on earth would you use that, you get much better odds if you green out by yourself...

I assumed cash out meant you get your cash out when you change your mind on a bet

I assumed cash out meant you get your cash out when you change your mind on a bet

Sep 29, 2012 -- 10:34AM, wooky wrote:

I assumed cash out meant you get your cash out when you change your mind on a bet

OMFG, are you serious????? hahahahahaha

sorry to be laughing at you, tho, still it's pretty funny

maybe they should change the name of it to 'cash redirected'