Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 1139 comments are related to the topic:
Cilic US Open thrashing of Murray: The Sequel

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 29 of 29  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 1,139
By:
nicky27
When: 06 Sep 12 01:44
gibbo any don't you back anything under 1.3 ??
If i told you a 1.3 shot had 99.99% chance of winning, would you still not back it ?
By:
DStyle
When: 06 Sep 12 01:45
veracity
By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 06 Sep 12 01:45

Sep 6, 2012 -- 1:42AM, Gibbo99 wrote:


Darlo and Evski....shown up for the number-crunching amateurs you truly are. Resorting to insults is the first sign of defeat in a debate. Refusing to lay off your profits is even MORE stupid. Unpredictable variables make laying off essential when betting on sports. Let me get this straight....In your book, I should be studying implied odds, backing low and refusing to trade out of winning positions?Yup, my work is done here.


What?

By:
DStyle
When: 06 Sep 12 01:46
and you can't really research something with veracity or veraciously.

(and don't post up the eroded meaning of the word)
By:
nicky27
When: 06 Sep 12 01:46
gibbo Cry
By:
evski
When: 06 Sep 12 01:49
Nicky, DStyle, Darlo,

Lets get the **** outa here. Some people don't want to learn, which is great because if everyone had a clue markets would operate in a much more efficient manner.

Gibbo, you are a gibbon's bottom.

Oh, and when the **** piss could you swear on here?? (been outta the game for a year due to work)
By:
razz
When: 06 Sep 12 01:49
he's so stubborn lol, not a good trait for a gambler. he should be open minded to what we are trying to tell him but im not sure we can put it much simpler. and we're only trying to help him
By:
nicky27
When: 06 Sep 12 01:50
yeah razz , evski and darlo , I'm outta here, onto the fed thread
By:
Gibbo99
When: 06 Sep 12 01:51
D style, i didn't bring up the quality of my maths, Evski did mate. Also, Hons is reasonably important and the institution was a top 10, redbrick university...i'd stop attempting to downgrade me as you'll fail > you're running out of options already and its really not that important in my opinion.

I won't be taking your advice as its poor unless you want to go bankrupt fairly quickly. Please outline where i'm wrong and while you're at it, tell me honestly if you think you're doing well on betfair? With your advice, i'd have a comfortable guess at 'not really'.
By:
Gibbo99
When: 06 Sep 12 01:53
DStyle, you mug!!!!! Voracity mate. Read the context - if you know what that means.
By:
evski
When: 06 Sep 12 01:54
ffs gibbo, it's on the internet you dumb cunto (yeah, that's right, I'm using ad hominems)

http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ugstudy/courses/biomedicalscience/biochemistry.aspx

Notts is a decent uni and they want GCSE grade C. Bull**** ALert, Bull**** alert!!!!!

Learn or don't gibbo, we all kno w this basic shyte, you don't. Ignore us. What does everyone else know, anyway. You're right. Everyone else is wrong. Everyone is an idiot but you. What use is maths when dealing with numbers anyway?
By:
Gibbo99
When: 06 Sep 12 01:58
Really dipsh*t, I think you'll find biomedical science at Nottingham Uni is totally and utterly different to Biochemistry and Imperial London you complete jobsworth.

Good research again muppet. Everyone is not an idiot, just you guys and your ridiculous betting techniques that dont even involve trading loooooooooooooooooool!!!
By:
Gibbo99
When: 06 Sep 12 01:59
Nottingham decent.....please.
By:
DStyle
When: 06 Sep 12 02:00
once again, your judgement under uncertainty is flawed: i pay premium charge at 40%.
By:
Gibbo99
When: 06 Sep 12 02:01
Really! You can't even find your way around premium charge? Nice work mate lol.
By:
shiraz
When: 06 Sep 12 02:04
Gibbo99, you really should'nt be so impertinent, these guys were trying to help you.  This is a perfect example of the old adage.  "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink".
By:
DStyle
When: 06 Sep 12 02:05
a splendid riposte.
By:
Gibbo99
When: 06 Sep 12 02:10
made my wedge for today and off to bed - I admire your steadfastness but honestly I think have a much better method requiring less stakes with far higher payouts. If you're doing well then good luck to you. If not, good luck but maybe listen a little to what i've said.
By:
Gibbo99
When: 06 Sep 12 02:12
Also Shiraz, they weren't trying to help me whatsoever. They were simply arguing their corner when I questioned the point of betting on Murray at 1.19, albeit without much reasoning.
By:
evski
When: 06 Sep 12 02:20
Gibbo, you are beyond help, that much has been established. The link I gave was to a biochemistry degree, in the school of biomedical sciences, at UoN. Imperial ask for B at GCSE. Don't believe me? Here's the link:

http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/ugprospectus/facultiesanddepartments/lifesciences/entryrequirements

Also, you used the word "jobsworth" improperly.

Now who's the ****?
Page 29 of 29  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com