|
By:
SoA I'm sorry but I have to tell you: I love you
![]() |
|
By:
thx we love you too
|
|
By:
ferrer is worldclass
|
|
By:
Hi all
There's not much money in the market it'd seem - is that to be expected? Nothing up for lay at all?! |
|
By:
5-2
|
|
By:
Ferrer looks exceptional this week
|
|
By:
None of them is playing top level... we'll have fun in the second set imo....
|
|
By:
He would trouble Djokovic playing like this.
|
|
By:
ferrer odds on
|
|
By:
for me is the same player since january
|
|
By:
I honestly never understood perfectly what value is... is it like: "I think this fact is more likely to happen than its price suggests?"
Yes. If you're planning to place more than a few bets in your life and want to make money, it's all you should worry about. |
|
By:
he destroyed del potro, no chance for delp in this match yesterday
|
|
By:
murray should be more agressive..i mean andy should really not getting involved in rallys with ferrer
|
|
By:
I really hate Ferrer ! Come on Andy
|
|
By:
next set will be a realy war.
|
|
By:
ferrer looks better not just in playing tennis
|
|
By:
Rob that's crazy then...let's discuss it tomorrow morning to not disturb the thread today...
![]() |
|
By:
addrian , exactly , no chance playing like that. need to find angles.
|
|
By:
pls win this set ferrer
|
|
By:
ricky there's nothing to talk about, it's very simple. if you constantly get 2/1 for what in your judgement should be 6/4 shots, obviously you wont win every bet, but eventually you will make a profit because your winning rate will be better than 2/1.
simples |
|
By:
Ok ricky, enjoy the match and cmon Muzza.
|
|
By:
Ferrer destroyed Del Potro but Potro is bad on grass
Andy is miles better |
|
By:
Time to get on Murray[:excited:
|
|
By:
better spend your money for poor childs, insteed on backing murray
|
|
By:
rickysomas1 04 Jul 12 15:16
@Biscuit: can you give the definition of "value" please? Not this.......... high_lander 04 Jul 12 12:50 You can get 4.1 for a straight sets Murray victory - that's fantastic value |
|
By:
high_lander I get it but I don't think that's about value.. that's about hitting winners, winners percentage and so on... a winner is a winner... a lost bet is a lost bet...
|
|
By:
Biscuit LOL
![]() |
|
By:
without serve murray is nothing at the atp, even florian mayer could beat him
|
|
By:
i think murray will break and take the 1st set
|
|
By:
you think worng
|
|
By:
if he wins his service
|
|
By:
we will see
|
|
By:
5-3 1set
|
|
By:
now 6-3
|
|
By:
and then break in set2 for ferrer
|
|
By:
Murray clapping his racquet to try to get the crowd involved. Obviously not confident he can do it on his own.
|
|
By:
I think Ferrer will trouble Murray on grass....
![]() |
|
By:
Ricky - you say you don't consider value but you made a perfect pre game call that Murray at 1.5 was not good value. Therefore i'm assuming you either laid him or backed Ferrer (i haven't read the whole thread). Therefore that is what you classed as 'value' and is so far proving to be correct.
Anyway enough talk about value. |
|
By:
ferrer at nearly even money is good value imo - i'll lay that
|
|
By:
I think most people struggle with value because you can never judge whether an individual bet was value or not. It wins or loses whatever the price. The only way for a better to gauge value is his long-term profits/losses with a sensible betting strategy.
|