|
By:
he cant be fav v nole
|
|
By:
on this form he wont be to far off
|
|
By:
he should be but he will not be
![]() |
|
By:
thats fine mate bigger price to back
|
|
By:
This is going to clash with CL final
![]() |
|
By:
just realised that
![]() |
|
By:
feck `one on telly one on comp then
|
|
By:
fcking he1l, u´re right...that´s bad man, big events in paralel
|
|
By:
djoko 1.8
federer 2.2 |
|
By:
;[p 18 May 12 22:06
feck `one on telly one on comp then Yeah. But easier to concentrate if it didn't clash. Shame Basel didn't make the final, Fed would have made them move the final to another date. |
|
By:
federer favourite because he beat andreas seppi?
i think not. |
|
By:
1.83 Djok Fed 2.2 is aboot right.
|
|
By:
really tough to call
|
|
By:
you can just pick a winner here, pure guess i would say, federer looks good
but djokovic had much tougher draw and went through in good style depends who wants it more, and we dont know that. i would say djokovic wants it more as he might try himself against nadal before RG i i woud have to put my mony on i woud(hate to say that) put in on djokowic |
|
By:
one thing im sure there will be breaks and rebreaks and it can be great trading opportunity to get involved during the match
|
|
By:
lay federer now to 2.18
he is djokovic's beeyatch. |
|
By:
If Fed plays at his best he wins. Still the best imo.
|
|
By:
I layed Federer heavily at 2.18 and 2.12, I thought it would go the other way but it didn't. I'm going to have to red out.
|
|
By:
nothing depends on Federer in this match.
It's all about Djoker's game. The problem is no one knows at this time what form he is now at?? So, nothing is known. Agreed with ;[p - Pick up a winner, and so be it. Risk your money, and don't look back. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Just to add, Federer played super stuff v Seppi but Seppi was dreadful. People seem to be over reacting to it.
|
|
By:
to claify my post below:
Federer's best vs Djoker's best will lose. I have no problem with that. The only problem I have is: whether Djoker will bring his best on the table? (kinda doubt it). Hope this explains. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
petr...laughter is the best medecine.
And you know what they say about laugh? Those who laughs the last, laugh the best. (Wer zuletzt lacht, lacht am besten). |
|
By:
Djoker in TWO!
6:2, 6:4 Rogi go home...to rest his old bones to carry out his #2 seed at RG. I don't think he will make it to the week two there. Time to retire, Mr. Oldie. ![]() |
|
By:
I think you hate Roger as much as I hate Nadull the cheater
|
|
By:
petr...
![]() ![]() ok...how about this scenario: Djoker beats Rogi, and then Djoko humiliates Nadull? If Federer beats Djoko, then he will be humiliated in the final! You decide. (Can't have it both ways). ![]() |
|
By:
no way djokovic will beat rafa in the finnal. it will be monte carlo repeat. dont go back too much to the last year guys.
|
|
By:
The value right now is with Joker outright at 4.8
He's more than a point bigger now than he was at the start of the tourney ![]() With only 2 matches to win, that's real value. |
|
By:
19 May 12 10:10 Joined: 03 Nov 07 | Topic/replies: 13,644 | Blogger: ;[p's blog
no way djokovic will beat rafa in the finnal. it will be monte carlo repeat. dont go back too much to the last year guys. But why go back to monte carlo? Holes in the court and poor conditions...novak couldnt be bothered. |
|
By:
monte carlo is relevant if you look at rafa djoko matches you will see big progress from rafa being annihilated totally,through getting closer at uso,then very close at australian open to finnaly beating him at monte carlo
on clay rafa i think regained his edge, he learns a lot of his mistakes and he is good to grind form when he is behind that s why i think rafa will win, but it may be much closer than monte carlo for sure |
|
By:
you said it would be a monte carlo repeat...is it relevant or not lol
|
|
By:
repeat of resoult and as i said is relevant lol
![]() |
|
By:
why this huge support for rafa all of a sudden...i thought he lost to verdasco last week
![]() |
|
By:
result
|
|
By:
i always supported rafa litlle bit why annyone would tour his back against rafa only because he lost once to verdasco
![]() |
|
By:
dont see how the monte carlo result is relevant.
|
|
By:
why?
maybe because its their closest meeting on the same surface where nadal is the greatest ? |
|
By:
when,where.. verdasco,u know all... dam lol
|