We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Tennis
Isner played the match of his life to win the semi, no doubt he will deserve the title if he can beat two of the big four in consecutive matches.
Could that be a bridge too far for big John? We shall see.
Already got a sweet level green here.
Mar 18, 2012 -- 4:15PM, tommo0001 wrote:
what ranking would isner be if he did`nt a missile in his racket
128
he's hitting with massive confidence right now
Mar 18, 2012 -- 4:21PM, WhiteAl wrote:
3 ticks - fed was 1.14 before he served
Fed is moving 1 tick per serve ... so if you back at 1.14 you can only lay at 1.14.
He moved three ticks because he was 0-15 on Isner's serve. If you're going to advocate scalping then pay attention to the market.
Mar 18, 2012 -- 4:25PM, Welshie5121 wrote:
Why do bet365 not show the doubles in IW yet they will show the doubles in Guadalajara...
because noone is showing the doubles..it's not up to B365
Just wanted to make sure no-one thought you could get three ticks just for a hold.
Starting to think FedEx might have a Slam in hin this year:!
unlucky john good effort tho
razz
18 Mar 12 20:42 Joined: 27 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 1,978 | Blogger: razz's blog
Mar 18, 2012 -- 8:40PM, yyyy wrote:
razz you don't know what playere Isner is???Heheheahaha...he grew up in a champ over the niht??loll...I didn't expect of people to bel;ieve me:GROUP 1: AntiDjoker: they want to belieeve that Djoko is weakGROUP 2: Djokerfans: they want to believe that was not djoko's poor, but UIsner's good.GROUP 3: realist: Me, me...and ew others.-----------------so I don't blame you. It's beyond your comprehention.
your not making much sense dude. what is your point? that novak intentionally lost for some reason known only to you?
ever heard of 'tanking' the match?
If not, then you're in wrong business, dude.
I you had, but didn't believe me, then look at todays' result. Isner THE CHAMPION??
(and yeah: I NEVER even hinted that I knew the reason. I don't even care what is the reason).
"Gotta question whether it's really razz or our lil self proclaimed genius and engineer (who can't do simplest maths) yyyy who's in the wrong business.
Just gutted I only had small change on it 
