|
By:
LOL...according to the tournament facebook page Dodig/Pavic won...Ivan Dodig i Mate Pavić pomeli su (6-3, 6-2) Andreasa Becka i Guillerma Garcia-Lopeza u 1. kolu parova. Dečki su odlično odigrali i već sad opravdali pozivnicu. Bravo!
|
|
By:
Greened anyway because the singles matches are about to start.
|
|
By:
The tournament website itself also say Dodig and Pavic won. (result section)
|
|
By:
1.79s available then! No courtsiders on this match evidently.
|
|
By:
so Tournament official site says CRO has won.. how safe is that? u saying not a single courtsider to take profit from the current odds?
i cant believe it! |
|
By:
I dont know. I dont know how the livescoring exactly works, I guess some of you do. But the scoreline would make sense in the way that livescore stopped working because the match would have been finished with this scoreline
|
|
By:
Hmm, im on a nice lay of Beck/Lopez for first set betting. Bet is lost but surely Betfair will correct it IF Dodig/Pavic won 1st set?
|
|
By:
The scoreboard comes from the umpires chair, so when it is suggested that it is a fix sometimes it is just because he or she has got their scores wrong and cant sort it out. It goes from wherever the tournament is on an XML feed to a server in Ireland, and then to your local host server and onto your PC.
|
|
By:
market suspended now... waiting to see if the money comes in or not in my account
![]() |
|
By:
IF that is the result, than they have to.
|
|
By:
They should correct it, LB.
|
|
By:
With my luck its probably 3/2 Lopez/Beck.
![]() |
|
By:
My guess is that one of Garcia Lopez or Beck retired.
|
|
By:
no courtsiders but odds were too accurate following the SB... no way they won the first set or this is a massive LOL...
|
|
By:
Thanks SoA. I knew it came from the umpires chair but after that I didnt know. But if it comes from the umpire it would also make sense the score maybe stopped at the specific scoreline, because if Dodig/Pavic won the first set then the match would have been finished. So the first set could have been a mistake with the scores from the umpires chair or something like tat?
|
|
By:
He could have got it mixed up yes.
|
|
By:
again with the same!!??
scores comes from the chair umpire but not DIRECTLY to your computer, there is a company who recibes first the umpire scores and IN THAT POINT is when the suspicious movements in the scoreline happens... |
|
By:
6-3 6-2 on the scoreboard now.
|
|
By:
Lol, check the scoreboard guys. It was the result indeed. Well done on your lay Lernhard ;)
|
|
By:
1.1 matched on a team that lost 3-6 2-6......ffs, chose bad time to walk dog.
|
|
By:
1.1 was a good lay but how could you know it? the SB was showing a perfect match development
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
and 1000 matched on Dodig/Pavic 2-0
![]() |
|
By:
I made a profit on this, but I would not blame Betfair for refunding bets on it. Even the bookies had the wrong scores!
|
|
By:
SB is still wrong..
NO WAY GGL/BECK HAD A 100% FIRST SERVE IN AND DODIG 98% ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
someone's 15k out of pocket there
![]() |
|
By:
I wasn't too serious zamo, just congratulating him on his lay ;)
|
|
By:
Srichaphan or Ancic?
31 Jan 12 11:11 I made a profit on this, but I would not blame Betfair for refunding bets on it. Even the bookies had the wrong scores! STUPID REASON... go back to Levine Isner thread and see what Betfair did that time... |
|
By:
Why should Betfair refund bets of indeed this is the result?
|
|
By:
No way they will void or refund anything.
|
|
By:
S&A is seething the whole week with Croatia
![]() |
|
By:
Only reason BF would refund certain bets is if they could determine exactly when the match finished, and bets placed after the result was already known should be voided.
|
|
By:
Why would I be seething when I made a profit?
|
|
By:
The Levine match was just a matter of the umpire getting the scores the wrong way round. No fix there.
|
|
By:
I would say that is highly unlikely Moneybagger.
|
|
By:
Isn't that what probably happened here than as well. Just the score reserved for the first sit?
|
|
By:
Match was live at the correct time... users were moving the market (no matter if they use the protennis SB or a russian friend at court). Scores were wrong? your fault...
|
|
By:
Probably is yes.
|
|
By:
The match had finished by 1049 uk time according to the tournament facebook page.
|
|
By:
the only way they'll void is if the party who layed 15k at 1000s is Betting Promotions, and the counterparty doesn't pay premium charge.
|