IF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFE
IF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFE
IF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFE
IF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFE
IF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFEIF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFE IF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFE IF YOU DONT WIN MONEY IN THIS MATCH ----> GET A LIFE
Won't be void, likely the market ops have seen what happened and just need to clear it with someone to settle it. Betfair promised no more voiding after the Davydenko one.
Won't be void, likely the market ops have seen what happened and just need to clear it with someone to settle it. Betfair promised no more voiding after the Davydenko one.
what mafia ,??? give me my money chela retired because he choked and he didn t have the energy to compete, after all the matches that he played laittllllllyyyyyyy
what mafia ,??? give me my moneychela retired because he choked and he didn t have the energy to compete, after all the matches that he played laittllllllyyyyyyy
"Betfair promised no more voiding after the Davydenko one. "
no they didn't
RMB - you have no reason to feel bad, unless it was you who paid Juan and Eduardo off.
"Betfair promised no more voiding after the Davydenko one. "no they didn'tRMB - you have no reason to feel bad, unless it was you who paid Juan and Eduardo off.
I spoke to several people at Betfair DStyle, very high up the food chain, and they all regretted the fuss caused and said they wouldn't void another one.
I spoke to several people at Betfair DStyle, very high up the food chain, and they all regretted the fuss caused and said they wouldn't void another one.
betfair DO NOT GIVE A SHIIIT if it was a bent match. bent match just means more money flowing through their site. and the mafia aint gonna trade out and lower their profits either [:laugh:
betfair DO NOT GIVE A SHIIIT if it was a bent match. bent match just means more money flowing through their site. and the mafia aint gonna trade out and lower their profits either [:laugh:
it's far worse pr if the newspapers report on a voided match.
How many news items did you read about the Davydenko match? How many have you read about other suspicious matches in the past?
it's far worse pr if the newspapers report on a voided match.How many news items did you read about the Davydenko match? How many have you read about other suspicious matches in the past?
All Betfair can do is pass on their information to the ATP if they ask for it, which they probably won't. In the meantime they have to pay out on the winner or it just creates a fiasco and sets a bad precedent.
All Betfair can do is pass on their information to the ATP if they ask for it, which they probably won't. In the meantime they have to pay out on the winner or it just creates a fiasco and sets a bad precedent.
I remember that match. Wilcox was awesome in winning 8-6 although the 3 double faults in a row by mdougall at 6-6 did help. Rort or brilliance................lets run with brilliance.
I remember that match. Wilcox was awesome in winning 8-6 although the 3 double faults in a row by mdougall at 6-6 did help. Rort or brilliance................lets run with brilliance.
true. just makes them look like idiots really. especially if there have been whispers of a retirement before the match. two seconds of research can go a long way.
true. just makes them look like idiots really. especially if there have been whispers of a retirement before the match. two seconds of research can go a long way.