Tennis
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 304 comments are related to the topic:
tursunov
tursunov
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 304
|
By:
bjvv Joined: 30 Dec 04
Replies: 40 26 Oct 10 21:05 for someone who has probably never placed a bet in her life, i don't think it's so weird that something like that doesn't cross her mind in the heat of the moment True. and even if it did why should she continue the match to help the backers and not do what she done to help the layers? She doesn't give a to55 about people who bet on her and rightly so. |
|
By:
pmsl at S and A
 |
|
By:
Turs has responded to Rev All Green's message about fixing
http://twitter.com/TursunovTales |
|
By:
So your argument is that top tennis players are not aware that people bet on them? I shall point that out to you the next time you claim a match is f1xed.
|
|
By:
Funny how social networking has bought these whole affairs a lot more closer, to have an actual response for us all to see is pretty amusing. Like how he was just in commu with Tipsa as well, nice mental pillow.
|
|
By:
funny thing is that everyone is acussing tursunov now
what if its even not his fault? what if the other guy is dirty? just because he is russian probably |
|
By:
****adoodledoo, what's he doing replying to the rev's posts?
surely you just ignore it, unless you've got a horrifically guily conscience... |
|
By:
i think its the opposite this time. He replied it sarcastically cause he may be sick of these accusations.
You still need to consider that he is well known, has had and still does have plenty of fans and supporters worldwide. He needs to think about his reputation too. I doubt Tursunov had much to do with this today. |
|
By:
He chucked the first set, would suggest he had alot to do with it
 |
|
By:
of course he was involved. pryz is now way good enough to be guaranteed to take the first without assistance.
|
|
By:
*no way
|
|
By:
Did Turs drift pre-match to 1.8 or was it during the first set when he went a break down?
|
|
By:
He drifted to 1.7-8 prematch, went to a high of about 1.9 a break down.
|
|
By:
He was definitely 1.9 pre match.
|
|
By:
Ah, I had a 10 minute lapse there, didnt realise he hit the 1.9 pre.
|
|
By:
You are allowed those Kaiser...I normally have a few myself
|
|
By:
Lol that Tusunov has responded. It's good though that some of these guys can be messaged on Twitter, I would presume that they look at messages addressed to them so even if it lets people know that some people know they're dodgy and makes them feel even a little bit bad then that's a good thing (even though I doubt those who fix a tennis match have much of a conscience).
|
|
By:
Interestingly he doesn't deny Rev All Green's allegation! He just says 'I don't know. You tell me' regarding the amount he made from the match.....I guess he was pressured to do what he did and doesn't argue with these guys, he just gets what he's given [;)]
|
|
By:
He hasn't posted on Twitter for over 12 hours
|
|
By:
i remember pashanski-turs 2007 well. it was the same storyline and both have been involved. just like in this case.
how does this twitter-thing work. can i see the messages sent to him as well or just the crap he is writing himself? |
|
By:
Click on Rev on turs's wall and you get to see what he was replying to.
As DStyle said, amazed he replied, loving the fact he did though, deffo guilty conscience. |
|
By:
twitters with tipsarefix about tennisballs. seem to be friends.
|
|
By:
What I don't get is this: (to put up an example): How come Betfair investigate the 2007 St. Petersburg Tursunov-Pashanski mathc and then 'let' go of the 'known bettor' because he has a net-'loss' on Betfair tennis. This hardly means that he is not involved. I too... sometimes have net-losses on betfair on a match where I have arbed. Don't tell me the 'russian' (if we say he is such) doesn't not have account(s) with other (lets call them Asian) betting companies where he probably makes more than the 'net'-loss which he (at that time) had at Betfair...
I don't get how come matches which are 'obvious' fixes - doesn't get more exposure in media's than we see... Is it really a coincedence that the 'the same people are "involved" in mathces with drastical odds changes which goes against all reason... time after time'? |
|
By:
None of the Asian books take serious stakes on tennis. It's betfair and pinnacle, that's it basically.
|
|
By:
TheManWithTheGoldenRun Joined: 12 Apr 08
Replies: 42 27 Oct 10 17:13 What I don't get is this: (to put up an example): How come Betfair investigate the 2007 St. Petersburg Tursunov-Pashanski mathc and then 'let' go of the 'known bettor' because he has a net-'loss' on Betfair tennis. This hardly means that he is not involved. I too... sometimes have net-losses on betfair on a match where I have arbed. Don't tell me the 'russian' (if we say he is such) doesn't not have account(s) with other (lets call them Asian) betting companies where he probably makes more than the 'net'-loss which he (at that time) had at Betfair... I was thinking the same thing. But apparently Betfair don't think like that. |