Specials
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 2752 comments are related to the topic:
IM A CELEBRITY 2025
IM A CELEBRITY 2025
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2,752
|
By:
They suspicious or just not watching?
|
|
By:
365 will just be a trader following the market here and BF don't monitor for suspicious patterns as they don't have a clue
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Obviously trader error didnt look anything suspicious at all, the edit was an attempt to save him to no avail, nice guy as well.
|
|
By:
Dey drink it in dee Congo
|
|
By:
Proper market watch starts here ! Though it's probably not far off already
|
|
By:
After yesterday said Eddie..... They obviously didn't show us what happened yesterday
|
|
By:
Yeah, I noticed that too.
|
|
By:
There was a big gloss over between revolts and letters from home
|
|
By:
No market clues tbh
|
|
By:
No, clean so far this evening
|
|
By:
Those lumps surrounding the first vote stick out a mile though
|
|
By:
Averaging 6k a day ginge jumped to 19k two days running
H has been very consistent, 5k per day with a couple of smaller spikes |
|
By:
What time do they flip
 |
|
By:
Money is still there for ginge
|
|
By:
It's probably within 5% ish but enough of a gap currently
|
|
By:
Not as blatantly transparent, but clearly keen money for H since early this morning and weakness with Ginge. You're obviously still going to get regular money for Ginge, and if they knew he was in front of the two and now 2nd, you wouldn't want to be laying much over evens, if at all. Someone is very confident opposing Shona.
|
|
By:
Lol, shona is bloody useless, not really rocker science
|
|
By:
Or rocket either
|
|
By:
Shona hasn't a cat in hell's chance. I laid a tiny bit. I would've laid the prices that were taken, but was trying to lay her for less.
|
|
By:
I think at least one of the lays on Aitch and Jack was a typo (shortly after both were backed). I made a typo yesterday
|
|
By:
of course but part of the fun of this fair is identifying informed money mixed in with regular money. for me there is evidence of informed money this morning. i'd say positive for Jack. Shona was layable at half the price yesterday evening. It's not an analysis of their chances, I didn't think she had a chance before or after last night's show.
last night (if they get it as I suspect), was the very first clean read with all the runners. if the same pattern is replicated tonight, we might then see a flip. |
|
By:
fwiw I'm just a rubber necker for this series, predominately. I was intending not to get involved, call me an addict ha! I have had an interest involvement so far, literally 20 exposure so immaterial. I do like to interpret patterns.
|
|
By:
Jack has just shortened from what eddie said, simple as that. Would be far lower if on a vote decent
|
|
By:
Decent vote share
|
|
By:
I don't think there is inside money myself, but ofc you never know. No sign of it on the elimination market last night. Vogue heavily odds on to go tonight for me is justified. Other thing is with, possible criminal consequences (for the politicians) KYC and deposit limits the new normal, it would make anyone with such info think twice.
|
|
By:
I feel anyway, you have to think, how would you play it if you were getting the info. So a partial vts went to the market leader, meh. Can't get too excited if the market second fav was second on the first (partial) vote. Then the next full read shows the top 2 flipped. You couldn't then be confident either way, but you could back the new leader. Possibly you are already involved on the original leader, so quite exposed. You know you will get further reads, so a cautious play on the second read. You could however be more confident in laying someone higher up the market with no chance.
Say the hypothesis is true, and someone is getting the order, retrospective to the vote. It's far from a slam dunk, there is a lot of pressure to get maximum benefit from your advantage. I imagine in that scenario it's very easy to move too quickly, and end up chasing the vote around. |
|
By:
Depends on the series oc, on this nearly always there is a front runner from the first vote to the winner declared. This series nearly everyone thinks there is prod support for two solo runners that are very closely aligned. As everyone knows I think Andy won every vote up the final when he got caught by JJ.
It is absolutely no coincidence in my mind that they stopped publishing all the voting data from that year on. |
|
By:
I don't think there is inside money myself, but ofc you never know. No sign of it on the elimination market last night. Vogue heavily odds on to go tonight for me is justified. Other thing is with, possible criminal consequences (for the politicians) KYC and deposit limits the new normal, it would make anyone with such info think twice.
There was no way of knowing for sure as the first vote didn't include of the runners (including Eddie). So yesterday would be the first 'clean' info, but Vogue was the other 'it could be you' anyway, a big outsider and would be naturally short to go next. Surely it would be better for the producers to do a genuine random 'it could be you', rather than the actual next bottom. |
|
By:
Absolute zero evidence the top 2 have flipped, you're just making mischief now
|
|
By:
You wally :)
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Jacks task was massively manipulated and sabotaged last night if you have a rewatch.
|
|
By:
Dingo dollars? Everyone goes for a cup of tea anyway
|
|
By:
No
I’m talking about the letter Task. The one where they got his question wrong. |
|
By:
Lol, they just got the wrong answer
|
|
By:
If it was the wrong answer, Aitch said “what was the correct answer then”?
Audio got cut off. Correct answer was never revealed. |
|
By:
Oh well, maybe a job for the supreme Court?
|
|
By:
Need to look at the bigger picture.
|
|
By:
H is thick as mince seems to be the bigger picture here
|
