Escapee
17 Mar 25 12:16
Austria, The winner is Austria.
Israel is the best song, but I don't think ESC will want to hold the competition there in 2026.
So unless ESC do a deal to hold it elsewhere in 2026 if they win, then Austria will win it.
Austria has single young attractive boy, high pitch voice, vocal intonation, some emotion,
and a fairly well crafted musical progression-conclusion. All assets which combine to make it
appealing to the judges and the televoters across Europe.
Sweden's song assets are narrower, it lacks emotion, it's a 'joke' song relying on having a catchy hook which is debateable and needs listening too a few times to catch.
As I've mentioned before, I'm an ESC novice, so make your own mind up.
G'luck
FFFFFFFFFUQIN YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA![]()
I prefer to research 5 months before hand and then lose. Just how I roll
I thought I was doing the same
May 18, 2025 -- 1:23AM, Cider wrote:
The dynamics are curious, beat all four countries that beat them in the semi on the televote.
possible explanations:
Ukraine - juries crushed them
Albania - they still did better than expected, got T10, but the very last slot in F doesn't have a great record, probably just because the organisers put the best songs a couple of slots before
Netherlands - poor guy was very nervous, was much much better in SF
Sweden - SFs have a bigger percentage of bubble than F
Estonia 2nd on televote, effectively first ignoring Israel. It was a superior novelty song to Sweden after all. But always likely to be hamstrung by the juries.
His social media footprint was huge.
a few years back there was a celeb BB, first show I recognised (only) one of the entrants who I knew to have a mega SM footprint from 10 years back, I put up £100 at 11's unmatched, cancelled after an hour in a moment of sanity (WTF do I know about BB? nuffing), he traded at 20's over the course of the show and won it.
Prior SM footprint is huge in these markets.

May 18, 2025 -- 8:06AM, Cider wrote:
It's fair to say in my view that Estonia and Sweden were fishing in pretty much the same pond, and both likely to be nobbled by the juries. Yes a much more historically favoured RO for the fav, and a tad less 'novelty'.One was about 2.2 at the post, the other about 50.
A lot of 'experts' thought that Sweden would get around 200 in the jury vote and Estonia sub 50. Most thought Sweden would get at least 100 more in the jury and were heavy favourites in the televote market so it stood to reason that Estonia were pretty much destined to not have a chance. Of course their jury score put them in the game.
May 18, 2025 -- 1:42PM, Angela Rebecchi wrote:
When I first heard KAJ at Melo I didn't particularly like the song, but after multiple listens, it became my favourite song. I think Sweden probably had a much lower televote % from those who were first time listeners.The market acted like it knew the jury score. I wonder if a big player got access to it early. Before the first few songs there was money for Sweden and Austria, money against France and Finland and even more importantly, money on Estonia and against Albania in all the markets (the perfect play having seen them get nearly 100 points in the jury when it was expected they would get hardly any). They made ever move you would have, having seen the jury vote
If the jury score was known wouldn't Austria have been backed down more and Swed laid more? They were flip flopping all the time. There was a bigger gap than expected between them and Austria was proving more popular than the market predicted. I don't really know, just suggesting an alternate theory.
Henry VIII
18 May 25 07:26
who was that escapee_
"Big Boned" gay bloke, Can't remember his name, so I've just googled the list of celeb BB winners and can't see his picture either.
I'm beginning to think my memory is faulty and it wasn't celeb BB because looking at the list of winners and contestants over the years, I recognise many of them and in this show he was the only person I knew of, the level of 'celebrity' in this show was lower than "Household name".
After typing this out, I've remembered that I'd had to ask his name on the thread about the show in this forum.
It's bugging me now, I've done 30 minutes of searching and can't find him. Are there any other shows in a similar format with C-Listers?
, ThanksEscapee 04 Mar 24 21:50
what's the name of the last bloke?
(camp, likes his calories)
Henry VIII 04 Mar 24 21:51
i don't know him david potts but if he can keep up the really positive attitude....could win
unlikely though, could be moody and bitchy.
Albania doubled in the side markets very early on in the final. And the money came for Estonia. That certainly seemed to suggest jury knowledge. Austria were backed and France and Finland drifted (also the exact moves you would make with the jury score). And money was very solid for Sweden which makes sense as it was widely thought they would beat Austria in a televote by over 100+. Each to their own but the evidence is there I think.
The Albania doubling in the side markets alone before the end of the second song of the contest has got to ask you why? Let alone all the other moves which tally with jury knowledgeAR I think you've got something if Albania drifted and Estonia shortened France was T3 with juries but drifted straight after she sang. I don't get France drifting from jury knowledge. She did well with juries - T3. IIRC she drifted after she sang.CORRECTION....
AR I think you've got something if Albania drifted and Estonia shortened early on. I don't get France drifting from jury knowledge. She did well with juries - T3. IIRC she drifted after she sang.If you take that view that the jury vote leaked then France had to win the jury vote comfortably to be able to win the OR. It was never likely to fly on the televote. But the price held up until she performed. I don't see how Sweden on 126 and 6th with juries screamed 'let's smash it at odds on', personally. Would be the opposite, as it panned out when the juries were revealed.On the other hand, Austria on 258 and a big lead would encourage money. Which, again, happened when it was revealed.If I knew the jury score I would have been backed Austria for a lot and had a saver on Sweden and Estonia and backed Estonia in the Top markets and opposed Albania which is exactly where the early money was (Austria heavily punted and Estonia, chunks in the 30s - over halving in price). Albania went from 3.5 to 6.0 in the Top 5 (which suddenly became a great lay with their horror jury score). Interestingly UK last place also was then really opposed with money for Iceland and San Marino (again tallying with the healthy jury score of UK and the 0s for the latter). Of course it might be nothing, but the movements were pretty odd and tally exactly with what you would do with that jury information if that was your inclination.May 19, 2025 -- 1:48PM, Henry VIII wrote:
CORRECTION....AR I think you've got something if Albania drifted and Estonia shortened early on. I don't get France drifting from jury knowledge. She did well with juries - T3. IIRC she drifted after she sang.
54 ahead of Sweden and 78 behind Austria, meant she was dead in the water.
Off the jury scores, it was a straight race between Sweden, Austria and Estonia (in that order imho) but the value being wildly with Austria (where the money was) as it became a case of can they be within 132 tele points of Sweden (which seemed close to a coin flip).I backed Austria 4.1 ish and laid Sweden close to odds on after seeing the semi. Sweden was a bit bigger at the post, and so was Austria. I believe some people thought Austria didn't have a great jury show. Estonia money can be explained by online momentum and social media noise after the semi. Can't speak on Albania as I didn't have them on my betting radar.
I did actually have a small bet on UK last place during the week, and laid it off during the show at shorter. There was some real howlers left in!
It doesn't mean there wasn't knowledge in the market, EV has often screamed that there is. But I didn't get that feel this year.I think AR's right. Brilliant bit of detective work. The jury scores would have been collated over 20 hours before the Final but it seems like our insider only got them at the start of the Final.I'm not getting this jury scored leaked thing.
Austria odds were slow to come in, didn't make favourites till 23:36 (looking back in this thread when I commented as such) and they soon (with in a minute or 2) dropped back to 2nd favourites again.
In my mind after the first 10 jury votes Sweden were getting very little scores and it was obvious they were in deep trouble, the market wasn't reacting much to this swedish calamity.
And then when the public votes were being announced, after isreal, estonia, poland and albania picked up huge chunks, it was obvious (IMHO) that sweden were not going to get 100 more than Austria.
I was a few sheets to the wind by then, but that's how I remember it.
The market got it wrong, and held on to it's belief way beyond the point it should have.
I didn't see any signs of leaks on Austria or Sweden, but I wasn't paying attention to Estonia or Albania.Dunno if it's hit the press yet but there's accusations Israel used bot votes and complaints from 4 countries who have found them alreadyPartially reported by telegraph i see, but it looks more widespread and seriousIsraeli bots, obviously, naturally.
Cambridge Analytica was 2016, This is 2025, look out the window, turn on the TV world news.
Elon's AI grok has been programmed to talk about white genocide in SA when asked a totally different question, of course there will be Isreali bots voting in ESC.
Don't moan about the playing field, observe it and bet accordingly or find another playing field to bet on.I think people are entitled to moan about cheating. Old fashioned view perhapsMay 19, 2025 -- 9:22PM, Escapee wrote:
I'm not getting this jury scored leaked thing.Austria odds were slow to come in, didn't make favourites till 23:36 (looking back in this thread when I commented as such) and they soon (with in a minute or 2) dropped back to 2nd favourites again.In my mind after the first 10 jury votes Sweden were getting very little scores and it was obvious they were in deep trouble, the market wasn't reacting much to this swedish calamity.And then when the public votes were being announced, after isreal, estonia, poland and albania picked up huge chunks, it was obvious (IMHO) that sweden were not going to get 100 more than Austria. I was a few sheets to the wind by then, but that's how I remember it.The market got it wrong, and held on to it's belief way beyond the point it should have.I didn't see any signs of leaks on Austria or Sweden, but I wasn't paying attention to Estonia or Albania.
Austria were 4.5 into 3.9 pretty much straight away (with blocks of big money wanting on). If you knew they had a 128 surplus on Sweden going into the televote you would probably be 2.6 Austria 1.66 Sweden 41.0 Estonia, the rest were all but dead in the water given the jury results. Interestingly Albania pretty much doubled in the Top 5 market straight away, with strong support for Estonia, that reeks of jury knowledge imho (Albania were given a shockingly low score and Estonia given a score much higher than anticipated). How else do you explain these movements? Each to their own, but I find those moves very hard to explain, and the fact they tally telepathically with the jury score is illuminating.
I don't think the Israeli complaints come from a betting POV, we all know they are advertising and buying votes (though I was surprised they went full throttle again this year). It's putting the competition at risk, and as fans of the contest, I think we all want a fair fight!Bear in mind there was great chunks on Estonia from 80+ into mid 30s at the same time as Albania drifting in the side markets and the money for Austria. Someone made some perfect moves that's for sure!So the original market got Sweden badly wrong, and the insiders' analysis was even worse!I think people are entitled to moan about cheating. Old fashioned view perhaps
Absolutely, and letting off steam is good for the soul.
"Don't moan about the playing field, observe it and bet accordingly" is a vignette from my unwritten tome: Reminiscences of a profitable gambler.
One of the earlier examples of the 'pimp spot' effect also that one.The very first #Eurovision artist for 2026 has officially been revealed
Representing Cyprus will be ANTIGONI - who is a previous contestant of Love Island UK!Ah I've been following her on IG for a whilethat's funny