Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 102 comments are related to the topic:
The blind leading the blind

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 102
By:
Cider
When: 23 Sep 24 15:46
It sounds cheesy enough but trading specials was fun, identifying ricks etc. And watching the shows had it's own version of fun, and of course plenty of online banter with other gamblers. I made a lot of money but it didn't feel like work & effort, which it would do now. So the one event that's still exciting to get stuck into is #1, and EV I like to start looking at it from the first live semi. Not the tedium of months of build up. spoty as I covered at length already is a magazine style show and vote now, nothing like the opportunities of a bygone era, would never get the 33-1 Giggs happening the way it is now for example. Again, heavily controlled by tptb. I get that people could still make work trading the events over the year, but it's not for me.
By:
stu
When: 23 Sep 24 17:38
I agree on the added 'fun' element of specials as a draw - I actually love music so listening to a song contest is something I'd do even without betting on it.

The social shows (IAC and BB) were a little different in fun - analysing people and how they come across etc. Though it is less immediate as a fun event to follow, and yes, sometimes feels more a drag than 'fun'!

Not sure about others, but I've also found my social watching of shows has dried up - the missus, my brother etc, all people who used to love RTV such as BB, basically not really interested in it anymore - that makes a difference in motivation to watch this stuff too.
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 23 Sep 24 19:11
Yeah, the painful betting is just a product of the slump in rtv popularity. 

The mug punters no longer watching
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 23 Sep 24 19:13
The glory days of backing that wagner and the scouse idiot in xf, then you could just about predict what astonishing price they would fall too before their doom was manipulated
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 23 Sep 24 19:17
You could set your watch by when the 'jedward are leading the vote' story came out
By:
Cider
When: 23 Sep 24 19:24
Jedward being elimination jolly for about 7 shows until Cowell finally liked them Grin

People smashing into Tesco Mary :p. Changing the rules mid show to dump her out when they knew they could.

It's all part of the general decline, lack of mug/casual cash, markets, pervasive desire for producers to exert full control over the outcomes. I still recall having £10K liability with Ladbrokes on specials. It was great whilst it lasted, and it lasted a very long time.
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 23 Sep 24 21:04
Other things that didn't help, fcking off the market makers with pc, bots that now jump in front of you instead, wanting £5 in front of your 10.  Fck off man
By:
Lifter
When: 25 Sep 24 10:49
Still a lot of "mug cash" around, and the potential for big wins. Sam at 8/1 and Nemo at 14/1 spring to mind.
By:
Cider
When: 25 Sep 24 14:54
The irony was in eurovision, the mug money triumphed over the 'wise guys' in 2022!. EV is still in the opportunity bracket, but for me that's in the final straight and points results in running, not the tedious build up hoping to be the first to see something. Whomever wins will always look to have been value at some point, retrospectively. IAC not so much, elimination markets obliterated and it's just not what it used to be.
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 25 Sep 24 18:02
Mug money? In what universe were ukraine gonna fail to win in 2022?
By:
Cider
When: 25 Sep 24 18:10
Indeed. A lot of people got burned though.
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 25 Sep 24 19:53
Especially putin and anyone working at his ammo dumps :)
By:
stu
When: 25 Sep 24 22:35
Just a quick question - do others on here find that people they used to watch specials with (e.g. wives, family, friends etc) no longer bother watching it? And does that affect how you watch or don't anymore?

Or, did you always just watch it solo in terms of using it as a betting medium?
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 26 Sep 24 08:11
They all used to watch scd, nobody interested now.  It took a lot longer to peak than xf, but i think it's firmly on the downslope now.

Can't remember anyone ever watching xf or bb with me.  They all watch celeb still, due to ant and dec.

They tend to sit through eurovision now it's big again
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 26 Sep 24 08:12
They always watched bgt
By:
stu
When: 26 Sep 24 17:29
Can't remember anyone ever watching xf or bb with me.

So, guess those were always just a watch solo for betting purposes. I used to watch BB with the missus, and she loved it for many early series, but now says she's just not interested in sitting through days of coverage - which I get.
By:
stu
When: 26 Sep 24 17:31
Though I then find sitting watching BB on my own somewhat a drag too - without anyone to discuss it with!
By:
Lifter
When: 27 Sep 24 12:19

Sep 26, 2024 -- 8:11AM, GeorgeBrush wrote:


They all used to watch scd, nobody interested now.

By:
Lifter
When: 27 Sep 24 12:19
My older parents and their friends were saying this about SCD the other day. They actually tend to record/watch on iPlayer and skip through the fluff
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 27 Sep 24 14:12
It's so self celebratory, awful toss.  It was fine when it was a load of non dancers learning to dance, loads of ringers now
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 27 Sep 24 14:13
I could watch that blonde girl all week, but she's actually been a dancer! Ffs lol
By:
Cider
When: 27 Sep 24 18:59
.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/tv/2024/09/27/chris-mccauslands-strictly-diary-2024-week-2/
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 27 Sep 24 21:10
He's just been on gogglebox
By:
Cider
When: 28 Sep 24 09:22
Pretty underwhelming reaction I thought. Dampens down enthusiasm somewhat. I'm certain the the show is far more scripted/prompted than it used to be, so these are no longer guaranteed to be genuine reactions. However it was a well done for taking part vibe, rather than he should win vibe. I have removed my exposure for the time being.
By:
armagnac
When: 28 Sep 24 10:52
A dampening down and a drift is what the thread needs from a low starting point, a good start but continuous ramping from
the judges only see’s a dead market from the off. A runner like Chris clearly has that winning moment, several winning moments on his and the BBC’s journey. I’d say the latter needs him more over his certain career boost. Whichever way this goes over the next few weeks I think overall he is the only plan.
By:
Cider
When: 28 Sep 24 11:13
It was dampened down, from a narrative perspective. Lowish scores and judges not giddy like the audience. The producers can't control everything and in my view it went better than they hoped, ie not expecting Chris to steal the show. However if you can take the boxers' reaction as somewhat genuine, he'll need to up his dancing game during the series. But I'll take 5/1 to 3/1 with nothing happening.
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 28 Sep 24 11:15
I thought he looked worse on googlebox than the first time i saw. Doesn't get better on closer inspection
By:
Cider
When: 28 Sep 24 11:28
Personally the technique was a plus, given the context. But what I think doesn't count. The next dance in hold will be more informative as he will need to be able to do well there, as that's his advantage. The brief footage of training looks pretty strong.
By:
armagnac
When: 28 Sep 24 11:42
He doesn’t need to improve week on week, he just needs to finish the competition better than he started to win
By:
armagnac
When: 28 Sep 24 11:47
Would appear the feel good win is well and truly factored into his price, he has to improve to win
By:
Cider
When: 28 Sep 24 11:50
Natural progression is a given as they identify techniques to work around his disability. He's been saying he could not hear what Dianne was saying or where she was due to the audience noise. The prods asked him if he wanted to have the audience silenced but he didn't want special treatment.
By:
armagnac
When: 28 Sep 24 11:55
He’s shrewd, the harder it is for him the more sympathetic the audience/judges are. Quitening them down and making a rick makes him look a doughnut
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 28 Sep 24 15:36

Sep 28, 2024 -- 11:50AM, Cider wrote:


Natural progression is a given as they identify techniques to work around his disability. He's been saying he could not hear what Dianne was saying or where she was due to the audience noise. The prods asked him if he wanted to have the audience silenced but he didn't want special treatment.


If that involves shooting the audience I'm all for it

By:
Cider
When: 28 Sep 24 19:16
start the car
By:
Cider
When: 28 Sep 24 19:24
pure jedi what he can do lol.
By:
Cider
When: 30 Sep 24 16:00
sorry for the typo in the OP, should have been the blind leading the bland!
By:
armagnac
When: 04 Oct 24 10:46
just a procession from here, odds on next week and beyond innit. 20+ backers i applaud taking the early gamble on the disadvantaged one
By:
TheBorg
When: 05 Oct 24 19:04
Toyah in the true coffin slot, middling comments without without enough of a savaging to get sympathy, a low score and then memory holed with Chris straight after.
Very hard to get out of the trap set.
By:
Cider
When: 12 Oct 24 19:37
Return of the jedi :)
By:
Cider
When: 20 Oct 24 15:12
Yet another home run from Chris & Di, these two are relentless.
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com