Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
armagnac
07 Jul 13 11:48
Joined:
Date Joined: 28 Aug 04
| Topic/replies: 63,883 | Blogger: armagnac's blog
anyone on them, sorry but no chance.
already getting on public's t!ts
arguments looked staged even before getting sophie to laugh task.
now even more so, there oblivious to how stupid its making them look.
i dont find them remotely funny
tweedle dum and tweedle dee b!tches more like
another 8 weeks of rehearsed arguments spells out no chance whatsoever !!

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 136
By:
armagnac
When: 07 Jul 13 11:51
sophie will end up getting dragged into there b!tching as were just starting to see also, so chav no chance either.

also backing the twins not very smart in the 1st place, only takes one of them to be a total pr!ck and your bets stuffed no matter how nice the other one is.
basically talking, more can go wrong with 'paired bets'
By:
lookingon
When: 07 Jul 13 11:59
Armagnac - couldn't agree more....that argument last night was sooo staged.
I find them annoying and the pairing of them is another BIG negative as one of them is ok at times.
They were so happy to hear the Wolfy boos as I think they thought she was their competition in the house after hearing the Wolfy chants a couple of weeks ago.
I'm sorry but if Jedward or Samanda couldn't win, these have no chance.
By:
armagnac
When: 07 Jul 13 12:01
very good last two points i didnt pick up on, good work.
yeah double figures looming imo
By:
lookingon
When: 07 Jul 13 12:07
I think they see themselves as the next big double act..... Ant & Dec or Morecambe & WiseLaugh
By:
armagnac
When: 07 Jul 13 12:08
stacking shelves explains all
By:
99heathk
When: 07 Jul 13 14:01
i also couldn't agree more. really starting to dislike them. very bad characteristics, especially the way he snapped at dan. and like someone else has said on here before.....they are polling the same as the likes of sam and sophie, but have about x5 times the amount of highlight footage.
By:
armagnac
When: 07 Jul 13 14:07
yep, more good points 99
value bet right now is too lay them
every chance there price will stay low for a long time as well, probably end up the most overrated short price HM's of all time !
as people naturally expect twins to do well as we have seen before
By:
armagnac
When: 07 Jul 13 14:16
more arguing in latest vid Cry
making it sooo easy for us
less may of worked if not so contrived but more will annoy the crap out of everyone, including the other HM's
By:
mach
When: 07 Jul 13 15:09
Don't diss the twins♥
And never over estimate the gbp ,
Far to soon to lay
By:
TheMadness
When: 07 Jul 13 18:28
As I said in another thread. They're just the sort housemates I utterly despise and yet go on to win. One of them, I think it's Joe, has a nasty streak a mile wide
By:
armagnac
When: 07 Jul 13 18:40
latest water vid is also so contrived, everything they do is.
total pair of pr!cks
there trying too be funny and not just being normal/themselves
quite pathetic to watch really and rather annoying
By:
Henry VIII
When: 07 Jul 13 18:48
I think they're a good laugh. Joe was aggressive with Dan but now we've seen the same aggression against Jack it's more comical than anything else. Their argument was funny and, contrary to some beliefs, natural. (The rapid fire shouting at the end may have been done before).

Because they have each other as emotional comfort and behavioural guardian they'll never get too bitchy or arrogant. Because there are two of them and they mix it's less likely for other hm's to have the privacy to start any negativity towards them.

And they're more psychologically sound than most of the hm's.
By:
TheMadness
When: 07 Jul 13 19:01
"Because they have each other as emotional comfort and behavioural guardian they'll never get too bitchy or arrogant."

They're already way too arrogant
By:
squares
When: 07 Jul 13 19:02
the rapid-fire shouting reminded me of Catherine Tate's Lauren - I was expecting them to come to a crescendo of "i ain't bovvered"
By:
TheMadness
When: 07 Jul 13 19:02
"Because there are two of them and they mix it's less likely for other hm's to have the privacy to start any negativity towards them."

That's true though. And possibly the same for the viewers
By:
George Bailey
When: 07 Jul 13 19:08
Of my reds these are the ones I feel most uncomfortable about.  For now I have them well behind Gina and Dexter in my stats but that lead could be a soft one.  Seems that 75% of the interactions we see are with each other....is that a winning dynamic? Dunno.
By:
armagnac
When: 08 Jul 13 16:14
feck me these two are utter twats
annoying wont win sh!t
latest vid, more of there pre-planned tripe
By:
armagnac
When: 09 Jul 13 11:01
there popular then Plain


.
http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1849016&page=2
By:
armagnac
When: 09 Jul 13 11:01
quite like this comment:

About as Funny as syphilis.
cannot believe how other HM's cant see what game these two are playing.
By:
armagnac
When: 09 Jul 13 11:03
cant wait to see there face when dexter strolls back in like the king of england Laugh
By:
armagnac
When: 09 Jul 13 20:35
nice 1 gina Laugh


Day 27: Who is the better twin?
27 mins ago
Gina and Dexter have been watching the House 24/7 (it's a tough job but someone's gotta do it...) so not much has slipped under their radar. Gina's clearly enjoyed her running commentary on the House antics so it was only a matter of time before she spoke out.

"Has your opinion changed on me?" Joe asked Gina

"It hasn't changed," she replied with trademark tact, "I already knew you were bitchy. I just saw the conversations. You know you are bitchy."

Joe claimed he did not and was disappointed that she had formed that opinion of him.

Jack didn't help by joking, "Joe, you're dragging me down," causing Joe to whine, "clearly Jack's the better twin. I know I'm more blunt but I didn't expect  bitchy." If you can't do the time and all that...

In the kitchen Dan reassured him saying, "bitchy can mean a lot of different things Joe." Of course it can.

Something tells us this one's going to rumble on. Gina's done with the chat but Jack and Joe are determined to stay in the House unti their birthday and don't want anything to stand in their way.
By:
scampi
When: 10 Jul 13 01:01
Basically they're Jedward wanabees (who had no talent)- thing is their Parents are too scared/delusional to tell them they have no talent AND they're pigugly to boot (bit like the rejects that appear on XFactor/BGT). [sorry to be so bitchy but BB brings the worst out of me]
By:
lookingon
When: 10 Jul 13 01:31
Does anyone like the these twins?....They just seem to annoy every one.
I actually have to mute them when they're on nowAngry
By:
scampi
When: 10 Jul 13 01:42
I can't see all the other female viewers out there voting for them either ;).
By:
lookingon
When: 10 Jul 13 01:51
Only a matter of time before their price has a big fat zero on the endWink
By:
scampi
When: 10 Jul 13 02:11
IMO the only reason their price is so low is their fairly big coverage in the highlights show (but as this thread has shown the more they get shown the more people dislike them).
By:
lookingon
When: 10 Jul 13 02:14
Bet even their parents dislike themShocked
By:
scampi
When: 10 Jul 13 09:47
LOL. Yeah, parents probably paid Big Brother to get rid of them for a couple of months.
By:
armagnac
When: 10 Jul 13 09:47
the price is as artificial as they are, 1st impressions are usually right.
the majority of people agree they are acting out rehearsed scenes from being together on the outside.
the more they 'act' the more p!ssed off we will get.
most of the people who actually liked them from the start will eventually get peeed off with them too, this is the reason jedward didnt win and they were never b!tchy or argumentitive ( in a nasty way ) to other HM's like these trolls are.
a little of the same thing is funny
a lot of the same thing is irritating and tedious
there fans can go only dwindle imo
By:
Henry VIII
When: 10 Jul 13 10:00
They're alright. At least they do things.

Latest TVPolls, Twins:

Win 9% (previous 6%)

2nd fav 6% (previous 5%)

Price is probably too low but Sam's price should be a bit higher than them atm imo.
By:
armagnac
When: 10 Jul 13 10:03
more staged sh!t


Day 27: Hula-Hula & Goodnight
15 mins ago
Last night, just before bed, the Housemates were treated to a special performance by Jack and Joe.
By:
armagnac
When: 10 Jul 13 10:07
even the prods are fed up with them !!!
biggest pair of idiots ive ever come across
looked like a few HM's were not that impressed either in that vid
i can see them getting some noms very very soon
annoying for us, i'd go fecking nuts if i had to live with the goons
By:
armagnac
When: 10 Jul 13 10:33
there is no way on this planet the prods will let them win !
for the simple reason, they could end up as famous as jedward !
really, this planet is not big enough for another set of heinous twins invading our living rooms on a daily basis.
i'd fecking move to mars
By:
armagnac
When: 10 Jul 13 10:50
FB comments from last vid are very marmite, virtually 50/50
might wait an hour and have a count up, when more have posted
like i said, the ones that like em will get fed up eventually Wink
By:
armagnac
When: 10 Jul 13 10:52
GB2 -  whats the HG say on these two ?
By:
five leaves left
When: 10 Jul 13 11:11

Jul 10, 2013 -- 10:00AM, Henry VIII wrote:


They're alright. At least they do things.Latest TVPolls, Twins:Win 9% (previous 6%)2nd fav 6% (previous 5%)Price is probably too low but Sam's price should be a bit higher than them atm imo.


Sam & Sophie doing much better on 2nd choices, which is a good sign when the numbers thin out.
The Twins doing badly

By:
armagnac
When: 10 Jul 13 11:17
this will be so easy to track anyway.
every time fb put a vid up of there antics, just count good/bad comments and track % ratio to see if it goes up or down.
my guess is it will decline the further the process goes

gonna try and wait for 40 comments each time then track
By:
Only-the-Brave
When: 10 Jul 13 11:21
hope you're right.  Gina/Dex 1-2 in either order would make me a killing Laugh

Think the twins are a threat though - certainly more so than someone like sophie.
By:
Only-the-Brave
When: 10 Jul 13 11:22
don't like the fact that they are keeping up this safehouse concept either - their bitchyness was overshadowed by their views to hazel this week.  Won't get away with it too long.  Hope they finish that sooner rather than later.
Page 1 of 4  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com