Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 74 comments are related to the topic:
**** REWARD OFFERED ****

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 74
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 19 Nov 12 11:48
Clearly not if you don't like the Star leaks Wink
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 11:48
You're on the wrong 'side' is what he means ski Wink
By:
Helmuthian Folds
When: 19 Nov 12 11:52
Lou,

As someone else stated before (and you chose to ignore hmmmmm) the actual onus should be on you to prove they are not correct.

Will be hard with every scrap of evidence backing up their story but why don't you have a go!
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 11:54
No it's not hel

I'm offering a reward for someone WHO CAN PROVE TO ME the leaks are right.


They can't though.
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 19 Nov 12 11:55
What is the reward Lou?

Can you prove it exists?
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:01
Yes I can.  I have the reward here.

















2 hours ...............................
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 19 Nov 12 12:03
You don't seem to know what it is?
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:05
Oh sorry misread that as 'where'.

The reward is I'll PM you the winner next year before the finals start so you can get your big money on, lay all the rest and win.  Simples
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 19 Nov 12 12:06
lol. You haven't got this one yet Wink
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:09
Seriously George now I know and he could well get beat but bl00dy good news to have Ella out and James not getting the votes.

Am I happy? ..................... yer just a tad. Wink
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 19 Nov 12 12:12
Baloney will get ya Wink
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:14
He might yes.

I've said all along and did so again in my summing up of the acts though you probably don't read that I would guess.  Said he was as good as anyone on Saturday and every wek he sings well.  Decent young man so unfairly treated.  Yep he's in with a shout.
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:17
He might yes.

I've said all along and did so again in my summing up of the acts though you probably don't read that I would guess.  Said he was as good as anyone on Saturday and every wek he sings well.  Decent young man so unfairly treated.  Yep he's in with a shout.
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:17
oops sorry.
By:
GymTanLaundry
When: 19 Nov 12 12:24
classy thread!

nobody can prove the star info until vote numbers are released at the end of the series. until then each person can use the info however the choose to.

i choose to believe it as i think it's very likely to be true.

each to their own.
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:27
Papa

You see that's more like it.  Gun at my head I would probably believe it but to take it as almost 100% certain and base all your bets round it is a very dodgy approach I think.
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:36
Tick tock tick tock Laugh
By:
GymTanLaundry
When: 19 Nov 12 12:43
Lou I'd have it as about 95% certain and I'm definitely basing the majority of my betting investment around it. am very comfortable with this approach.

would love to see an update leak from them.
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 12:44
Papa yes so would I.  Good luck.
By:
Dizzy42
When: 19 Nov 12 12:49
Doubt we'll get another leak now...

The 5% of doubt would be with regard to the inferred percentages relating to Chris's lead.  I think that this has been over-stated.
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 19 Nov 12 13:15
Thing is though Dizzy if it were true (and it may well be of course) then why exaggerate his percentage lead in their story?  It's either all true or all not true isn't it?
By:
Dizzy42
When: 19 Nov 12 14:49
You've obviously never worked in the media then Lou!

Everything has an angle, or a spin.  I take nothing at face value.  There are hidden agendas everywhere.

Call me a conspiracy theorist - and I know you'll never agree.  But more often than not it pays to be sceptical about motives.
By:
Froggitt
When: 21 Nov 12 19:34
Daily Star have proved beyond all reasonable doubt that they are "well connected".
By:
Jack Bauer '24'
When: 21 Nov 12 22:46
The more interesting question in these days of the Leveson Inquiry etc, is how they manage to get access to the voting figures every year and whether they are profiting personally by doing so.
By:
squares
When: 09 Dec 12 22:48
TOTALLY SPOT ON - YET AGAIN

Kudos to the guys from The Star
By:
bearcub
When: 09 Dec 12 23:15
you will have to pay for the forum Christmas party Lou Laugh
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 09 Dec 12 23:16
Laugh  good bumping bear
By:
bearcub
When: 09 Dec 12 23:19
It was Squares gb

Never forgets a thing that one Laugh
By:
GeorgeBrush
When: 09 Dec 12 23:21
Not another one with an axe to grind Wink
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 10 Dec 12 11:03
So unlike Squares to be anti me!!

Fair enough The Star was right again, what can I say.

Even I'll have to take more note next time.

Cheers all

Lou
By:
Dizzy42
When: 10 Dec 12 11:07
Another to add to the rule book... Never question the veracity of the Star leaks - but do always question the timing!
By:
stu
When: 10 Dec 12 11:13
They could completely stitch us all up next year though! Mischief
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B
When: 10 Dec 12 11:22
stu

That's exactly what I mean.  It looks very very good info but what if next year we all 'back' accordingly and it's wrong somehow.  That's what I said all along just be a bit cautious but again on this occasion it was spot on.
By:
stu
When: 10 Dec 12 11:25
That's the game Lou, we all live by the sword...
By:
timbuctooth
When: 10 Dec 12 11:55
Those of us who follow The Star slavishly have benefitted, what, 10?, 15? times. If/when it get's it wrong, we can afford to take a hit.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com