Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Eeternaloptimist
23 Feb 12 14:38
Joined:
Date Joined: 28 Jun 10
| Topic/replies: 38,236 | Blogger: Eeternaloptimist's blog
with Brad and Manu.
Pause Switch to Standard View Farrell at fly half......
Show More
Loading...
Report Child of the Rafalution February 23, 2012 3:14 PM GMT
Think they will lack some imagination in the mid field. Manu is good but doesnt strike me as a thinking man's rugby player.
Report NSL February 23, 2012 3:25 PM GMT
A better line-up than Hodgson-Farrell-Barritt though surely?
Report worcesterwilly February 23, 2012 3:29 PM GMT
VERY ONE DIMENSIONAL THINKING IMHO!

They clearly are running scared of Roberts/Davies and their ability to feed North and Cuthbert and Halfpenny...

It is therefore purely defensive in my opinion and will restrict their attacking options...

It also dangerously under estimates the flair the Welsh have at 9-15.....indeed at 6-8 too.....
Report Cha-Ching February 23, 2012 3:40 PM GMT
What 10-12-13 combo would you pick then worcester?
Report Child of the Rafalution February 23, 2012 3:43 PM GMT
NSL - yes I agree
Report worcesterwilly February 23, 2012 4:08 PM GMT
Cha-Ching     23 Feb 12 15:40 
What 10-12-13 combo would you pick then worcester?

Erm.....I dunno I'm not the England Coach or do I support England despite being born there...mind you the England 15 starting to look like the cricket 11...a league of nations

I just feel his selection is reactionary and one dimensional...

so Flood , at 10....

I'd not have discarded Flutey so quickly and kept Farrell at i/c as he could get absolutely hammered by the Welsh flankers playing at 10....
Report Cha-Ching February 23, 2012 4:20 PM GMT
So it's one dimensional and reactionary but you can't come up with a better alternative? Fair enough, you're no England supporter, but maybe we should wait and see how they play before slating them as a combination?

Flood, Flutey and Farrell?..... Lol...
Report worcesterwilly February 23, 2012 4:28 PM GMT
It just shows how bereft of talent England are......
Report Cha-Ching February 23, 2012 4:36 PM GMT
In that case I'm amazed you've allowed Wales to get as big as 1.7. To you it must be FREE MUNNY.
Report pacficrc February 23, 2012 4:45 PM GMT
Wales beat Ireland through Roberts and Davis with North off his wing in the centre, up against a smaller D'arcy and McFadden, Barritt and Tuilagi should have that covered as it's one of Wales' main go-to moves.
Report big_dunc February 23, 2012 5:15 PM GMT
Add Tommy Bowe to that list too. His defence was nothing short of disgraceful. I do not see England falling off anywhere near the same amount of tackles as Ireland and Scotland did.
Report pacficrc February 23, 2012 5:22 PM GMT
Agree fully, aside from his missing tackles, Bowe seems to play to a different defensive system to the rest of the backline.
Report TheVis February 23, 2012 6:10 PM GMT
Flood as your man Worcester -  come on???  Did you see the way he "stepped up the mark" last week for Leic and was just crying out to take a shot at the winning DG?  PMSL Laugh
Report RugbyMan February 23, 2012 6:33 PM GMT
I can't work out how Flood is a better option defensively of offensively. He must be doing things that I keep missing. And Flutey can't have been injured for the best part of 3 years.
Report Eeternaloptimist February 23, 2012 8:25 PM GMT
Don't worry boys, worcesterwally is a refugee from the politics forum. Anybody who thinks that Farrell won't man up isn't playing with a full deck. Anybody would think he was a shrinking wallflower. Laugh
Report sewter lives again February 23, 2012 8:54 PM GMT
Farrell, Barritt and Tuilangi

OR Flood, Hape, and Tindall

what a no brainer
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com