Politics
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
29 Sep 26
22:51
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Aug 21
Removed 
Show More
I didn't know he was on Bail till Donnie told me , So no surprise was refused , Criminal damage , time he gets to court will prob be time served if Found guilty
surely would have been better off Pleading Guilty may have ended up doing a couple of Months , Might even have got a Suspended
surely would have been better off Pleading Guilty may have ended up doing a couple of Months , Might even have got a Suspended
some of the maritime laws that were being mentioned as possible charges carry very lengthy prison sentences.
Not sure if you've noticed but lots of those pally marchers got lengthy jail for just holding up placards and traffic.
Protesting is now categorised as terrorism by UK government, being labelled an activist protestor is the same category as being labelled a terrorist in the eyes of the law (the same laws are used to monitor and jail them)
Don't think he's going to avoid a jail sentence
Not sure if you've noticed but lots of those pally marchers got lengthy jail for just holding up placards and traffic.
Protesting is now categorised as terrorism by UK government, being labelled an activist protestor is the same category as being labelled a terrorist in the eyes of the law (the same laws are used to monitor and jail them)
Don't think he's going to avoid a jail sentence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bs4Z-Sj7qsQ
I said as Much Elsewhere Dancing , Who owns the property he is accused of Damaging ?
Surely if the Owner is not known , there is no case to answer ?
Its like when we were Kids there would be Dumped motors on the Street , the Kids would wreck them
the old bill would tell you to move on , nowt about the damage that was done ..
Has DT actually got a legal Team ?
Surely if the Owner is not known , there is no case to answer ?
Its like when we were Kids there would be Dumped motors on the Street , the Kids would wreck them
the old bill would tell you to move on , nowt about the damage that was done ..
Has DT actually got a legal Team ?
He was hilarious when he whacked Michael Crick with a magazine. Classic.
He was hilarious when he whacked Michael Crick with a magazine. Classic.
magaloons would go full foaming at the mouth psycho and call it an asassination attempt if someone whacked any of their cult leaders with a magazine
Ron thinks assault is funny.
One of his Christian values no doubt.
One of his Christian values no doubt.
They think violence is funny when it suits them, and none of the TDS bros can explain that.
Crick would have had a good case for damages because it was on TV but he wanted an exclusive interview.
You're assuming his guilt in advance ! Where's the evidence ?
I said as Much Elsewhere Dancing , Who owns the property he is accused of Damaging ?
Surely if the Owner is not known , there is no case to answer ?
Boats been taken back to France as well so they likely won't even be able to say what the extent of any damage was to it.
Surely if the Owner is not known , there is no case to answer ?
Boats been taken back to France as well so they likely won't even be able to say what the extent of any damage was to it.
As Solzhenitsyn said -
For a professional criminal, possessing a knife was treated as almost normal — “mere misbehavior,” part of their tradition. The authorities often viewed them as “socially friendly” or “socially close” elements (lumpenproletarians who were not class enemies). Their criminality was excused or minimized because of their class background; in the ideology, they “couldn’t help it” or were potentially re-educable allies of the proletariat.
For a political prisoner or ordinary person (especially anyone charged under Article 58), the exact same knife was treated as evidence of terrorism or counter-revolutionary intent. The punishment was far harsher.
For a professional criminal, possessing a knife was treated as almost normal — “mere misbehavior,” part of their tradition. The authorities often viewed them as “socially friendly” or “socially close” elements (lumpenproletarians who were not class enemies). Their criminality was excused or minimized because of their class background; in the ideology, they “couldn’t help it” or were potentially re-educable allies of the proletariat.
For a political prisoner or ordinary person (especially anyone charged under Article 58), the exact same knife was treated as evidence of terrorism or counter-revolutionary intent. The punishment was far harsher.
I wonder if Danny's favourite passage from the bible is the same as Russell Brand's
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TuE2WTFR020
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TuE2WTFR020
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539