|
By:
Tried to start a thread about this a couple of days ago.
Wasn't sure of Morgan Mcw.eeney was the banned word or pa.nts on fire was. |
|
By:
Their defence of the "robbery" is ridiculous.
But surely the coppers have taken Mandelson's phone in their investigation, and so will have all the messages with McSweeney anyway. Only delaying the inevitable. |
|
By:
It's Labour innit, the SJWs will be looking the other way
![]() |
|
By:
Not really.
Whats on Mandelsons phone seized as part of a criminal process will only become public if he is prosecuted for a crime. What was on Mcweeneys phone relates to Starmers terrible decision to appoint Starmer. Two very seperate things. |
|
By:
*appoint Mandelson
|
|
By:
Clinging on to his job like a drowning man clutching a straw, pitiful stuff.
|
|
By:
Porky seems quite content that it might all come out in the wash in a couple of years if Mandelson gets prosecuted and If the Mandelson/Mcsweeney/Starmer messages are relevant to a criminal prosecution.
No doubt he will be on here defending the boobie whisperer by then anyway. |
|
By:
the met are part of that team. which we all knew beforehand anyway.
these fools expect the plebs to believe Mcswindle had his 'phone' stolen, with all of the government secrets and contacts on it, and it was treated the same as the rest us and just given a crime reference number for the insurance. and as is evident to absolutely anyone, messages haven't been saved to the sim for about 15 years. any new device will have the whatsapp history etc. he hasn't lost all of his contacts ![]() |
|
By:
the met were involved in trying to save 'huw' and the bbc weren't they, I seem to recall
all in it together |
|
By:
The delicious irony obviously, is that something that the proles do know an awful lot about, and likely much more than these fools, is mobile phones
![]() |
|
By:
If this was a Tory scandal, one poster on here would started 23 threads on it by mow.
But, not a word. ![]() |
|
By:
one can only laugh
|
|
By:
It looks like an open door for the 'led by donkeys' 'lads'.
Any odds on their new project? |
|
By:
What's the big controversy about the Mandelson appointment that we're awaiting?
I mean, what will we know that we don't already? I keep saying Starmer should have been up front from the start and said something like "we know about Peter's good and bad sides, but we know he has links to those in Washington and can use those links to benefit us." Acting all coy and and undermined was ridiculous. |
|
By:
The relative silence is deafening, wd for trying, porcy. The syndrome lads must
be watching the news like we watched Dr Who as kids, from behind a cushion. |
|
By:
Whether Starmer appointed a paedo becus da politics?
|
|
By:
Saddo - you've become very weird of late. Used to be able to have a discussion even if I often didn't agree. Now you just want to flounce. Get a grip lad (in a nice way).
|
|
By:
shrewdie - Well, I don't think he'd been convicted of that before had he? And he's not being investigated for it now. Only the usual dodgy deals and misuse of info. Which is sort of precisely the kind of thing that you could say would make him a good fit for the job. I mean, if he does get convicted for child abuse, and it comes out that Starmer knew about it, then fair does, but that seems to be spinning the current situation off a fair bit doesn't it.
|
|
By:
I am spinning it porcy.
Because that doesn't stop you from saying a war has been started because of similar rumours. |
|
By:
eh?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I will try and break it down for you porcy.
According to you the war in Iran is is to keep sexual Epstein allegations off the news for Trump. According to you any suggestion of sexual Epstein allegations relating to Mandelson and him being appontied by Starmer will require an investigation or conviction before we can 'spin' it. Is that correct? |
|
By:
The immediate issue us Starmer lying to parliament about not knowing of Mandy's ongoing relationship with Epstein. That's the here and now, an in this country.
No wonder he has subsequently given up the pretence of trying to answer any questions. Global statesman, nee superstar forensic lawyer :) |
|
By:
ah ok
Yes, one of the reasons - imo - was to distract from the increasing clamour to release the files, and the fact that mainstream channels were now starting to report on the statement that Trump himself abused a kid. Has there been any significant leak of Mandelson being involved in the abuse? I'm all for arresting him and throwing away tghe key if so. But I was always under the impression, Mandelson was more in the "good connection who provides valuable info" side of things. You can spin away all you like though. Free country. But try not to be so offended if someone comes on and wants to talk about the facts as they are though. |
|
By:
lol
|
|
By:
ah ok
Yes, one of the reasons - imo - was to distract from the increasing clamour to release the files, and the fact that mainstream channels were now starting to report on the statement that Trump himself abused a kid. So the investigations and convictions only matter, when........ enlighten us, I'm struggling here? |
|
By:
He isn't even aware of the hypocrisy contained within the same post
![]() |
|
By:
Everything the mainstream claim about Trump must be assumed to be true though. Obviously :)
It's not like they would carve up his speeches to deliberately mislead people on critical matters, or anything like that! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Why did Huw get away with it? Why did they give him a lump of money? Why was he protected by the met? Why did he get let off with a slap on the (non w@nking) wrist?
|
|
By:
Why were the mainstream, and liberalists on here, so desperate to protect him?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
cider - as before, go on then. State your case.
|
|
By:
You also think Starmer is lying then, PP?
But you still support him as PM, I believe? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Tin foil porcy.
|
|
By:
I'm not fussed about Trump. I have no idea what is true and what's not, same as you. Palpably you want it both ways, for the people you support, only the supposed facts count. For the people you don't, anything goes.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|