|
By:
As ever, the hollow argument of ‘white grooming gangs’ as though anyone is defending such a proposition
You have evidence son, and I’ll support your argument Try finding any that specifically targeted children on race I’ll wait. |
|
By:
who cares if kids are targeted on race or not?
they're kids ya creepy weirdo. Normal people still care if kids get abused, they don't just turn up because it's due to race. Child abuse is not just your latest culture war meme. God, some right menaces on here. |
|
By:
Hahaha omfg
So racism, is the optimum grievance….until it’s shown not to be a white man’s burden, that correct? The thing you you pop, is that you don’t even know how little you do know, and you are prepared to look stupid in showing it. There is a particular acronym for Group Based Child Sexual Exploitation. It’s when group activity targets and traffics vulnerable children and works in a co-ordinated fashion. On your daft analysis, if this wasn’t a particular issue, and as kept being used as a silencing mechanism (until it was disproved), then just as a relative factor based on ethnicity There would need to have been evidence of 13 times as many white grooming gangs than the Pakistani gangs now serving jail sentences So with such an abundance of evidence, why don’t you show us some? |
|
By:
The Left is so downright pathetic on this issue, they don’t seem to care how they look.
I have repeatedly stated, if you have evidence on ANY pedophillia, then call it out-nobody is defending any of it….except you ofc who just doesn’t want to know but is happy repeating tropes that have been disproved. |
|
By:
Plenty of evidence, including PHOTOS, albeit handily redacted by trump's team, and thousands upon thousands of emails between Epstein and various billionaires/ royals/ high up politicians involving tall if minors being used and abused.
|
|
By:
Talk of"
|
|
By:
God, you just circle around but are too dense to get it.
You even use the correct word. Vulnerable. That's who is abused. Vulnerable kids. But you're fine with it as long as it's white men having their way with them. Cos Elon tells you not to look at that, and like the good little doggie you are you do whatever gets you a nice pat on the head. |
|
By:
Firstly
Pandy… Don’t scratch around with hearsay, show up. There are believed to have been in excess of 100k victims in England to grooming gangs, many of whom are prepared to give testimony and have resulted in huge numbers of convictions We don’t need hearsay, it’s proven and tested in courts across this land. Pop Your pitiful argument, where have I been ‘ok’ with any of it? The reality is that the majority of noncing doesn’t get hushed up, it doesn’t get or require defending….and if anyone knows of anyone doing it they need reporting-and those who knew about it and did nothing need reporting too Can I be anymore clear than that for the hard of thinking? The problem you have though, is that the majority of grooming happened in Labour wards and as Casey herself attests having been tasked with researching the whole affair- was covered up. So slowly but surely we move towards convictions of those who repeatedly looked the other way. |
|
By:
And yet, as a distraction I’m supposed to answer for chit nobody actually knows, but they think they know, of things that happened on some far away island
Just as these posh privileged groups of apparently white rich men here, that so many like to refer to… But not a single piece of evidence is provided of. |
|
By:
Back to labour.
Couldn't give a damn about the kids themselves. Only that you can use it to try to damage an ideological enemy. Just as with your lack of interest in the Epstein files, or all the fraud going on in the red states, you're so well trained to hear only what your feeders want you to hear. |
|
By:
Dusty of course you are correct in despising 'grooming gangs' we all do. There have been hundreds convicted in the Church of England and the Scouts over the years, never mind childrens homes like Kincora. Key as was pointed out to you is vulnerable children are targeted unfortunately.
|
|
By:
Then stop talking
Shows us the comparison Show us who were responsible and who covered up these things. Over here, it has taken a private Inquiry because child abuse apparently just doesn’t matter that much, even when there copious amounts of evidence, enough to have huge numbers of convictions. Where are all you similar convictions? |
|
By:
Lapsed this tiresome fckn tedious argument
Show me anywhere I have attempted to argue anyone looking into those cases (many of them no longer being the apparent h=threat they used to be btw) are wrong in doing so? Because that is the exact thing that is happening here, anyone telling of the realities gets loads of deflection as though we mustn’t look |
|
By:
Still a lot of numbers in the church with allegations. Rather than 'gangs' i would think the white English pedo is a solitary operator. A lot of cases in Ireland where abuse has been committed by a family member,i would think that applies in UK too.
|
|
By:
And that lazy association was the argument used to silence Braverman and other attempts to investigate the bigger issues
They said something like 84% of cases were perpetrated by white grooming gangs….an u truth Casey said there was no evidence of What they did was look at the ethnic population of the land and drew a conclusion with zero evidence, then pushed it as gospel. Most pedos who get found out go to jail, the issue is who covers up when the wider public know of it? |
|
By:
I hope you agree that anyone in these files who is guilty of wrongdoing face the full force of the law?
|
|
By:
Depends what you mean by wrongdoing
And why I have to apologise for stuff that happens elsewhere Ofc Mandy taking payments and not declaring those interests are relative to here I can’t imagine there is anything that gets even remotely close to the abuses we know of here with grooming gangs. But like I said, let’s hear the testimonies |
|
By:
People have the 4rse on over Elon
They seem to have got upset because he published court papers that were limited in publication (that is an over exaggeration btw-look it up) |
|
By:
Not sure what having the 4rse means.
But with Musk, I just find it interesting that the blokes who claim to want to "protect women and children" hang off the every word of someone who was deperate to get to Epstein Island and created software that allowed creeps to undress children online. I mean, if he's your idea of a good judge, then you be you I suppose. |
|
By:
I know the feckless empty head of the lefty seems to like to simply agree with who says something rather than the thing they say
But why is any of that last post in the slightest bit relevant to those of us over here, just because you like you distract from the points that happened to be true, and happened to have been released by Elon. It’s you making the association that I only repeat what Elon says, when I was referring to Tommy and his reveals long before. Just because Elon happened to have released evidence that helped the cause, one that you seem to be decidedly lukewarm about, doesn’t prove the former claim. |
|
By:
Funny you mention Tommy. God knows how many wrong-uns he's connected with too. Seems like abusing is a prerequisite for joining his campaigns. Can get you a list of names and their offences if you fancy. Isn't it funny how these guys are so keen to make the easily-led believe child abuse only involves brown people.
|
|
By:
Yeah sure
You got the receipts let’s have em Let’s hope you know enough to stand by the accusations though, because I hear many call him racist then get asked to show how he is racist and they go rather quiet. |
|
By:
Oh you mean offences of other people not Tommy
That’s like saying he once lived on a street where somebody did something wrong And other such weak assertions. I know in you daft head bingo you have to be able to answer an abstract to prove a definitive But in the real world, it doesn’t change the facts of what Tommy said does it? |
|
By:
Billy Charlton, Richard Price, Leigh McMillan, Robert Ewing.
There's lots more, but I'll let you dig into them a bit if you fancy opening your eyes. |
|
By:
No let us know
I don’t know who these people are, or why their names disprove the evidence you feel uncomfortable accepting (but the PM decided couldn’t be ignored any longer) |
|
By:
let google be your dog, not me
|
|
By:
No you are bringing these people up as some degree of defence to what I’ve said happened to be true regarding the grooming gangs
Why have anecdotal events got anything to do with the 100k plus children over looked by grooming gangs? |
|
By:
It’s the same bs story
You can’t speak truth unless you can defend every single dreamed up argument about every other thing |
|
By:
This is further evidence of the progressive abstraction btw
Put it in your notebook |
|
By:
Handily, these guys have all been convicted. So no need to hide behind the "Right, can you please be Woodward and Bernstein and trawl through everything and build a prosecution." It's all there already. Couldn't be easier.
Unless you just don't want to see. |
|
By:
Why is any of this relevant to the evidence of cover up of grooming gangs?
|
|
By:
I never said it was. It's relevant to your interest only in non-white grooming gangs.
|
|
By:
The people you think are authorities on the subject seem to surround themselves with actual child abusers. Normal people may question that. Others may not I suppose.
|
|
By:
No
You have failed to explain why there was industrial cover up of gang related activity, to such an extent that those who labelled everyone having a problem with the fact there wasn’t a proper inquiry as far right. When even the PM had to change his position on this. And as a distraction you bring up people I’ve never heard of and imply they did stuff, got caught and went to jail supposedly What has that to do with anything, if anything it proves nobody was covering up for these individuals |
|
By:
I wonder if you’ve ever spoken to a person who at some stage in their life did regrettable things?
Does it make everything you ever do wrong? |
|
By:
TV NETWORKS not naming TRUMP until they have SLAM DUNK info
emails not enough |
|
By:
That’s assuming that “SlamDunk” info. exists, still exists or emerges.
|
|
By:
You havent seen the files have you.There are hundreds of testimonies from young girls with various stories about tru.p and gid cohorts regarding rape, abuse , even murder. It's all there online , so go and look at it.
|
|
By:
But no doubt you'll trust trumps word over the victims
|
|
By:
I wonder if you’ve ever spoken to a person who at some stage in their life did regrettable things?
Who amongst us can truly say they've never hung around with a load of nonces? |