|
By:
But we see exactly what edy is all about mining troves, spending time attempting to study people when all can see edy is irrelevant without having to dredge anything.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Ok, but as usual you are strongly avoiding saying anything about your own significance compared to my great irrelevance.
Either way, so about the depoloticised judiciary. Am I understanding it correctly that it needs to be hollowed out because it rules over parliament. But with it being politicised its decisions are also ruled by who governs, right? |
|
By:
Or is depoliticising the judiciary about you wanting to actually politicise the judiciary into making decisions on behalf of your chosen politics?
|
|
By:
My own significance?
I’m an electorate in this land, you are just somebody alienated from your own people and have to spend time attempting to draw people in to keep you company, when you just get ignored. But aye, nobody works too hard for too little reward, if you have ability you thrive. Maths happened to be my subject, followed by innovation, not that it’s any of you business. Now edy rattle on all you like, you change nothing and have no impact on anything. |
|
By:
So your great significance and worth to this world is...that you successfully have managed to not die yet since you were brought into this world? How truly inspirational.
Anything on the judiciary? |
|
By:
I will have you know that I have also not died and am part of the electorate of a far bigger, better, stronger, more important country.
So who is irrelevant here, dustybin? |
|
By:
So that’s what ‘winning’ looks like is it?
Spending your time on numerous threads waiting for replies And even waiting, then posting again when you don’t get acknowledged Reposting, goading and pestering people for their opinions on things when they don’t give the first fk about yours? That’s why you are irrelevant edy, your post count screams how insecure you are. |
|
By:
But off we go
More scattergun posts from edy all day, attempting to convince anyone he isn’t tragic. |
|
By:
Go….
|
|
By:
So nothing on the judiciary?
|
|
By:
Are you avoiding that because you were caught, once more, in repurgating silly facebook group things without having had spend an own thought on it?
|
|
By:
spent, sorry. I should not lower my level of English to yours.
|
|
By:
Good luck to the flag wavers in pink and their wife beating partners.
Once Farge has stopped the boats hopefully DOGE will go after indigenous spongers and house them in barracks. |
|
By:
Bit harsh wanting granny angie sent to the barracks.
|
|
By:
All spongers and parasites ought to be happy with a roof over their heads and food. Why should we pay for individual homes for these people?
|
|
By:
In each of the past 3 years, more people migrated to Britain than to America, a country that is 40 times larger by area than the UK, and has almost five times the population
|
|
By:
I've blocked attention seeking Norbert because his ridiculous oversized font is taking up to much space on these threads.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Let’s see if ICE pick up all the agricultural workers
|
|
By:
There have been 10 million migrants to the USA in the past 3 years, so I’m afraid this is absolute bollox
|
|
By:
The figures are based on legal immigration
|
|
By:
Jerry the trouble is you have been telling lies now nobody believes anything you say
|
|
By:
Brexit was always a pro-migration move and also clearly billed as such, so not sure why people are surprised that the past three years have had a lot of legal migration. One doesn't become Singapore-on-Thames without lots of migration.
|
|
By:
And this is Farage’s friend in Amrika
A federal appeals court in New York has upheld a $83.3 million judgement against Donald Trump for defaming E Jean Carroll after the president claimed he was immune from liability. Trump “failed to identify any grounds” to reconsider the case on the grounds of presidential immunity, and the jury’s verdict was “fair and reasonable” given the “unique and egregious facts of this case,” the appellate judges said Monday. Last year, a unanimous jury returned a verdict awarding $83.3 million in damages to the former Elle magazine writer for the president’s defamatory statements during his first term in office and in the years that followed. A separate jury had already awarded Carroll $5 million in 2022 after finding Trump liable for sexual abuse. |