Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
politicspunter
11 Nov 20 14:39
Joined:
Date Joined: 20 Mar 18
| Topic/replies: 33,885 | Blogger: politicspunter's blog
Multiple markets up now from various firms on 2024 President plus Democratic and Republican candidates.
Pause Switch to Standard View 2024 USA Presidential Election
Show More
Loading...
Report politicspunter November 16, 2021 5:03 PM GMT
As I have been a member for a few years now, it's fair to say I understand the operation of their product. I find them fair to deal with and their customer service is excellent.
Report timbuctooth November 16, 2021 5:09 PM GMT
So it`s `10/11; Yes, but he`s trying to scam bf readers`? You`re admitting it`s the `evil lying` option, rather than the `clueless` one. Typical leftie; even when it`s nothing to do with politics, constant lies.
Report politicspunter November 16, 2021 5:13 PM GMT
I am not sure what you think is a "scam". I have found them very fair. I have had one or two, relatively minor, disputes with them over the years but they were resolved amicably and fairly.
Report timbuctooth November 16, 2021 5:43 PM GMT
If that`s true, then it means you never get the value prices, the ones they void. They`re bookies masquerading as an exchange, and allowing your bets to stand confirm that they have you down as `mug`
Report politicspunter November 16, 2021 5:50 PM GMT
I find their exchange very competitive. I don't ever recall them voiding any of my bets over the years, off the top of my head. They are settled normally very quickly, as soon as the official result is announced.
Report politicspunter November 21, 2021 6:56 PM GMT
USA (Texas), University of Texas at Tyler poll:

Governor election

McConaughey (Ind.): 43% (-1)
Abbott (GOP, conservative): 35%

+/- vs. 7-14 September 2021

Fieldwork: 9-16 November 2021
Sample size: 1,106

The power of the celebrity candidate.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 21, 2021 6:57 PM GMT
Magic Matt?
Report politicspunter November 21, 2021 7:00 PM GMT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_McConaughey
.

This guy here.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 21, 2021 7:11 PM GMT
Yeah, I'm a fan of his acting,
not that I've seen magic Mike, but
my sister tells me he's great in that too.

The Lincoln lawyer is a good film

As is A time to kill,
is a study of jury verdict making
in the USA, and relevant to todays
juries.
Report politicspunter November 21, 2021 7:16 PM GMT
If you look at "celebrities" such as Trump, Reagan etc, the power of that tv in the corner has massive influence on where you cast that cross. Remember that scene in Back to the Future where Doc asks Marty who the President is and he says Ronald Reagan? ....The actor? Of course, you need to look good on tv..
Report Corky November 21, 2021 10:46 PM GMT
Still wondering how Lori Lightfoot could have been elected in a country that likes good looking celebrities. Cry She gives me the creeps.
Report Corky November 21, 2021 10:47 PM GMT
Did she have a lot of postal votes Grin
Report politicspunter November 21, 2021 11:14 PM GMT
I wouldn't write Biden off. Prices of over 6.0 for any incumbent are tempting and it looks to me as if there are early tentative signs that he is beginning to turn things around in the economy and employment situation. Covid doesn't appear to be getting much worse either.
Report Giuseppe November 21, 2021 11:19 PM GMT
for Biden to win in 2024 he will firstly need to stand and, secondly, have gotten rid of covid
Report Giuseppe November 21, 2021 11:19 PM GMT
nobody is going to vote for this gobshyte if covid is still rampant in the winter of 2024
Report politicspunter November 22, 2021 2:43 PM GMT
http://stpetepolls.org/files/StPetePolls_2021_State_November19_CY8V2D.pdf
.

DeSantis has a fair edge in Florida polls.
Report A_T November 23, 2021 8:25 AM GMT
Democrats Are Openly Rooting for Donald Trump
Donors, strategists, media executives are 'praying' he runs again in 2024


Most professional Democrats and other college-educated liberals would agree that former president Donald Trump, in the words of the New York Times editorial board, is "the greatest threat to American democracy since World War II." Some might take offense at the suggestion that World War II was a greater threat than Trump, and insist on invoking the Civil War. In any event, these people were terrified at the thought of Trump beating Joe Biden in 2020. What seems to terrify them even more is the thought that Trump won't run again in 2024.

https://freebeacon.com/politics/trump-2024/
Report politicspunter November 23, 2021 9:07 AM GMT
Count me in with them. If Trump doesn't run, the betting action will likely be abysmal compared to if he had run.
Report A_T November 23, 2021 10:38 AM GMT
Republican National Committee agrees to pay some of Trump's personal legal bills

The Republican National Committee has helped pay for some of former President Donald Trump's legal bills, and the party says it is "entirely appropriate" to assist him.

In October, the RNC paid the law firm of Ronald Fischetti $121,670, with Federal Election Commission records showing the money came from the RNC's general account. Trump hired Fischetti in April, and he has represented Trump amid investigations by the Manhattan district attorney's office and New York attorney general into the Trump Organization's business dealings. The RNC received the requests for payment early in the summer, a person with knowledge of the matter told The Washington Post.

"As a leader of our party, defending President Trump and his record of achievement is critical to the GOP," the RNC said in a statement. Trump spokesman Taylor Budowich also released a statement, saying the RNC is "our important partner in advancing America First policies and fighting back against the endless witch hunts."

https://theweek.com/news/1007400/the-republican-national-committee-agrees-to-pay-some-of-trumps-legal-bills
Report politicspunter November 23, 2021 10:45 AM GMT
That's a strange one. I thought the investigations in New York were related to the Trump organisation tax issues?
Report dave1357 November 23, 2021 10:49 AM GMT
the RNC promising to pay was probably the only way trump could get a lawyer, given his record of non-paying.
Report politicspunter November 23, 2021 11:27 AM GMT
https://smarkets.com/event/42461161/politics/us/donald-trump/trump-to-become-president-before-2025
.

Trump to become President before 2025

Money piling on to this, now £12,155 matched, price now 7.4 (from 50.0).
Report politicspunter November 23, 2021 11:28 AM GMT
Possibly the money of timbuctooth or Timber?
Report A_T November 23, 2021 11:31 AM GMT
Money piling on to this, now £12,155 matched, price now 7.4 (from 50.0).


surely it would just be easier to burn the money? maybe they like giving it to other punters.
Report Whisperingdeath November 23, 2021 12:07 PM GMT
I think it is a long way out!

I’d hope each side could pull up a candidate with some honesty and integrity or at the very least fake it.

God bless America, they need all the help they can get.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 2:24 PM GMT
https://smarkets.com/event/42461161/politics/us/donald-trump/trump-to-become-president-before-2025
.
Trump to become President before 2025


Now £15,083 matched, price down to 5.7
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 2:45 PM GMT
A fool and their monet

are soon parted.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 2:46 PM GMT
That 15k amounts to about 1k actually matched, as we know it. Fooling people like you into believing it`s 15k is proof positive that these charlatans can fool the mugs all of the time.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 2:48 PM GMT
It's actually £15,083 that has been matched tim.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 2:51 PM GMT
It's probably timber or timbuctooth that is betting on it.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 2:54 PM GMT
Timbucktoth will be laying it
once the dancing is finnish.

Timber is likely skint.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 2:54 PM GMT
Yes, good points.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 2:56 PM GMT
It'll be mugs that don't know
dates backing it, led on by
rampers.

Smarkets likely will void this.


Betfair should put a meerkat up

Will smarkets void their trump
before 2025 market

CoolCool
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 2:58 PM GMT
Smarkets won't void it. Their market rules are clear. If folks like timbuctooth and timber want to bet it, good luck to them.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 2:59 PM GMT
I reckon they will.

The rules are clear.

But people are thick and
don't read em.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:00 PM GMT
I am certain they won't void it. They are sticklers to their own rules.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 3:01 PM GMT
You can't go round having
traps in betting markets.

Bookies are getting a hard enough
time without fleecing idiots
like this.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:01 PM GMT
Unlike another place...
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 3:01 PM GMT
£2 matched at 1,000 in here = £4 matched
£2 matched  at 1,000 on scamarkets = £2,000 matched

So, if the charlatans claim a 15k figure, it could be as little as £30 actually matched, some 500-times the true figure! A fine example of mugging the mugs.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:03 PM GMT
Well, perhaps they read the posts on here of Timber? He has been adamant about Trump being reinstated and so have multiple other diddies on twitter/you tube conspiracy sites.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:04 PM GMT

Nov 25, 2021 -- 9:01AM, timbuctooth wrote:


£2 matched at 1,000 in here = £4 matched£2 matched

Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 3:05 PM GMT
Lord denning was master of rolls
in appeal court.

When talking about contract law

He said something like...

I quite agree that the more unreasonable a clause is, the greater the notice which must be given of it. Some clauses which I have seen would need to be printed in red ink on the face of the document with a red hand pointing to it before the notice could be held to be sufficient.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:06 PM GMT
timbuctooth • November 25, 2021 3:01 PM GMT
£2 matched at 1,000 in here = £4 matched
£2 matched  at 1,000 on scamarkets = £2,000 matched

So, if the charlatans claim a 15k figure, it could be as little as £30 actually matched, some 500-times the true figure! A fine example of mugging the mugs.

Tim, how many times do you have to be told? Smarkets model isn't the same as Betfair.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:07 PM GMT
Hey, maybe Timber is correct regarding the Arizona audit etc and all the others. Perhaps Trump was cheated. If so, the folks backing him stand to win a right few bob at huge odds.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 3:09 PM GMT
£2 matched at 1000 is 2000quid

£2 matched at 1.01 is £2.02

Would be great if exchanges
standardised system and got it right.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:10 PM GMT
They are all different, they have different models regarding matching, rules and things such as premium charge.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:11 PM GMT
I find all of them useful, for different reasons.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:13 PM GMT
Let's suppose on Smarkets Tim wanted £1000 at 15.0 on the market above and I layed him the money. Tim will have layed out £1000 and I will have layed out £14000. Total matched £15000.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 3:14 PM GMT
Easy to work out

But would be great if they
were accurate!

Remember the days of opening
accounts on betfair and matching
£10 to open forum.

Just lay 1.01 for £10

Lol
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 3:17 PM GMT
Don`t forget, most of any amount matched on scamarkets is their own money, a bookie offering prices in what looks like an exchange; again, designed intentionally to fool the mugs. And, because it`s their money, once they`re on the wrong side of any bet, they can claim it as `unfair`, and void it, up to FOUR DAYS LATER!!!
All in all, prime charlatans, so good, they even have their mug punters defending such outrageous practices!
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:19 PM GMT
In all the years I have been a member, I can't recall any of my bets being voided. Settlement and payment is prompt upon official result (unlike another place).
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 3:23 PM GMT
^^^Translates as; `I`m a mug, I`ve never, EVER!, got the value, scamarkets love me!`
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:26 PM GMT
As I am a member and you are not, I am in the position to assess value whereas you are just a guesser that only backs the outcome that politically you want to happen.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 3:34 PM GMT
I`ve lived off gambling all my life, never had a proper job, so it seems to be working. You, on the other hand, seeeeeethe with envy at real punters, real gamblers, so much so that you even feel the need to call yourself `punter`, feel the need to forever proclaim to the world what you`d like to be. But you didn`t have the cojones to live such a life, the closest you can get to those aspirations is stalking me!
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:39 PM GMT
You will never win long term tim because you only back who you want to win, driven by your political ideology. Here is a very simple thing to look out now regarding value. One of the most active UK markets currently is the upcoming North Shropshire by election. In one place you can bet the LibDems best price at 5.2 for £20. In another place you can bet the LibDems best price at 5.6 for £177. Which one is the best value?
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:42 PM GMT
Btw, I don't consider myself a gambler. The folks who bet against me are gamblers.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 3:42 PM GMT
politicspunter Joined: 20 Mar 18
Replies: 3381925 Nov 21 15:39 
You will never win long term

CHORTLE! A lifetime, my lifetime, isn`t `long term`? Definitely worth another CHORTLE!!!
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:43 PM GMT
You are a proven loser.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 3:50 PM GMT
Link, please?
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 3:55 PM GMT
These are some of your lay bets of Biden AFTER he had won...

Layed £5,000 at 1.02 losing £100
Layed £41,000 at 1.03 losing £1,230
Layed £53,500 at 1.04 losing £2,140
Layed £45,280 at 1.05 losing £2,264
Layed £15,000 at 1.06 losing £900
Layed £15,000 at 1.07 losing £1,050
Layed £4,000 at 1.08 losing £320
Layed £2,100 at 1.09 losing £189

Total layed £180,880. Total lost £8193.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 3:59 PM GMT
Cherry-picked eight plays out of hundreds I had in a winning market; link to me being `a proven loser`, please? Or are you LYING again?
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 4:01 PM GMT
I have just shown you some of your losing bets on a market where you were wiped out. How crazy can someone be to lay the winner after the result was known?
Report Giuseppe November 25, 2021 4:05 PM GMT
not this shyte again Plain
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 4:12 PM GMT
Crazy? No, just someone who knows what he`s doing, a lifelong winner at this gambling malarkey. Let me try and help you by pointing out that your inability to figure out how I won on that market, despite you having spent hours trawling through the PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE, merely serves as confirmation to the world that you haven`t got what it takes to be a punter. Ask nicely, I`ll put you out of your misery, run you through it, explain it to you step by step. But you`ll then have to be careful, scamarkets will suddenly start voiding your bets!

(Sorry to all other readers who don`t need such explanations, but pp`s a desperate case, needs all the help he can get and, as a good and right thinker,  I`m feeling charitable to the poor soul)
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 4:18 PM GMT
I have posted some of your losing bets in a market you were wiped out on. You heavily backed Trump/Layed Biden because of your political allegiances where as usual you only back who you want to win. Once you had lost a packet on the result, Trump said it was fraud. You were so foolish that you believed him and started to lay Biden (some bets above) even AFTER the result.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 4:26 PM GMT
So many lies in that post^^^! Here again is the PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE as proof; have another study, see if you can spot it, if not, just ask nicely

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq1E1UhR29p65vk2bkVmuaQ
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 4:29 PM GMT
I have posted the legible bets. The rest are illegible through your manky monitor (your house must be Abraham Lincoln). Feel free to post them.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 4:44 PM GMT
politicspunter 25 Nov 21 16:29 
I have posted the legible bets. The rest are illegible

No you haven`t, no they`re not. More lies. Do you EVER stop?
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 5:11 PM GMT
They are illegible. Feel free to post them. What's stopping you?
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 5:12 PM GMT
I assume it's because the vast majority of them are backing Trump/ laying Biden pre election I suppose.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 5:18 PM GMT
Doesn`t matter what the vast majority were, all that matters is the final p or l. I won, you lied.
Report politicspunter November 25, 2021 5:23 PM GMT
Post your bets.
Report timbuctooth November 25, 2021 5:56 PM GMT
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCq1E1UhR29p65vk2bkVmuaQ
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 25, 2021 7:46 PM GMT
Organisers of the rally that occurred outside of the White House on 6 January minutes before the Capitol was attacked by Trump supporters reportedly used “burner” phones to communicate with the president’s inner circle, including Eric Trump.

From the indy.

Not seen a huge amount of coverage
but can't be long before hes
asked about this infront of folk
and under oath.
Report keyboard_line November 25, 2021 10:21 PM GMT
i just got back after 5 pints and found my 20 lay at 5.7 on that 2025 smarkets trump market had been matched, im not sure about smarkets, the date stamp shows 23/11 at 9.21 pm, thats a couple days ago, maybe thats when i placed it, or maybe ive been totally mugged off offering a ridiculous price
Report Giuseppe November 25, 2021 10:25 PM GMT
Eric Trump coordinated the january 6th unrest

LMAO
Report Giuseppe November 25, 2021 10:26 PM GMT
you sure you've read the rules properly on that market

if he wins in November 2024 that doesn't count?
Report keyboard_line November 25, 2021 10:27 PM GMT
Will Donald J Trump be inaugurated as US President again before 2025?
Report keyboard_line November 25, 2021 10:27 PM GMT
i can assure you im not sure
Report keyboard_line November 25, 2021 10:28 PM GMT
This market relates to whether Donald J Trump will be inaugurated as US President again before 1st January 2025 (Washington DC time).
If Trump wins the 2024 US Presidential election but is not inaugurated until the scheduled date in January 2025, this market will settle as No.
Report Giuseppe November 25, 2021 10:28 PM GMT
"Organisers of the rally that occurred outside of the White House on 6 January minutes before the Capitol was attacked by Trump supporters reportedly used “burner” phones to communicate with the president’s inner circle, including Eric Trump."

so people in front of the White House were talking to Eric Trump, while people in front of Capitol were trying to smash windows

am i missing something here?
Report Giuseppe November 25, 2021 10:31 PM GMT
ok understood

looks good value to lay

but that is a long time to have money tied up in a 6.0 lay I suppose
Report Giuseppe November 25, 2021 10:31 PM GMT
i suppose you can get your stake back if it drifts
Report keyboard_line November 25, 2021 10:41 PM GMT
i would fully suspect that all betfair posters meeting up in, say macclesfield as a centre of uk type place, in say march 2022, makes more sense
Report A_T November 26, 2021 7:28 AM GMT
Eric Trump coordinated the january 6th unrest

LMAO


have to agree - hard to imagine that clown coordinating anything
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 26, 2021 9:46 AM GMT
Doesn't have to have organised it
to have been involved in it.

Not sure why somebody needs to
invent an argument to dismiss
when simple facts are available.
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 11:20 AM GMT
Trump to become President before 2025

https://smarkets.com/event/42461161/politics/us/donald-trump/trump-to-become-president-before-2025
.

Price still shortening, 5.3 now with £16,311 matched.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 26, 2021 11:33 AM GMT
From twitter

The only way for Trump to become President before 1/20/2025 is for the office of Vice President to become vacant and for Trump to be nominated by the President to become the new VP, then be confirmed by the Senate, then for the President to leave office early. Highly unlikely.

Maybe bill Gates will activate the chip
he planted in sleepy Joe,.. And its
Bill Gates piling into smarkets
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 11:36 AM GMT
Now that it's come down to the price it is, I am starting to scribble out possible investment returns over the years the bet is likely to be active. Looks better than a tax free ISA at first glance.
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 11:41 AM GMT
Having said that, it's probably best hanging on for now as the price continues to drop. If Trump were to announce he was running, you could see the price shortening much further.
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 11:46 AM GMT

Nov 26, 2021 -- 5:33AM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:


From twitterThe only way for Trump to become President before 1/20/2025 is for the office of Vice President to become vacant and for Trump to be nominated by the President to become the new VP, then be confirmed by the Senate, then for the President to leave office early. Highly unlikely.Maybe bill Gates will activate the chiphe planted in sleepy Joe,.. And itsBill Gates piling into smarkets


Hold on, what about the Arizona Audit !

Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 12:41 PM GMT

Nov 26, 2021 -- 5:20AM, politicspunter wrote:


Trump to become President before 2025https://smarkets.com/event/42461161/politics/us/donald-trump/trump-to-be... still shortening, 5.3 now with £16,311 matched.


4.9 now..

Report Jumping-cuckoo-monk November 26, 2021 12:45 PM GMT
what price you laid DT @ PP?
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 1:10 PM GMT
4.5 now..
Report Magic__Daps November 26, 2021 4:13 PM GMT
As for Smarkets, a firm who PP has claimed are "a stickler for their rules" - why didn't they follow them here? Disgusting firm.

As for you quoting matched amounts from Smarkets, that is just misleading, however you want to frame it. You could quite easily quote how much money has been staked on back side of the bet to make it more transparent.


https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/oct/03/ibas-bet-declared-void-should-be-paid-out


A ruling by the Independent Betting Adjudication Service (Ibas) has raised the possibility that nearly £30,000 in winning bets were incorrectly voided by an internet betting exchange following a race at Leicester in April when punters on the Smarkets exchange were in effect able to bet at odds of 100-1 that an outsider would not win.

Ibas ruled last week that Smarkets should pay £3,302 to Tony Mapplebeck, one of its customers, for a winning bet which the firm originally declared void.

Mapplebeck was placing bets on Smarkets on 8 April this year when he noticed that another user had offered a bet trying to back Thatsallimsaying, the 20-1 outsider in a four-horse contest, at the minimum price of 1.01 – the equivalent of 100-1 on – before the start of a race at Leicester. More than £30,000 was available to be laid at 1.01 and Mapplebeck matched a bet of about £35 to win £3,302 if the horse was beaten, tantamount to a bet at 100-1 that the horse would not win.

Thatsallimsaying finished last of four and, when the market was settled, Mapplebeck’s account was credited with £3,302.75 in winnings from the bet. Less than an hour later, however, he received an email from Smarkets which informed him all bets at 1.01 on Thatsallimsaying would be declared void because these were “clearly the result of a significant user error”. The money was removed from his account shortly afterwards.

Later the same day Smarkets emailed Mapplebeck again, claiming that the bet had been placed into the exchange as the result of “the opposing party’s account being compromised”.

However, Smarket’s Terms & Conditions, published on their website, warn customers that they are “fully responsible for the bets placed on Smarkets”, adding that Smarkets will “never question you about the relevance of the bets you wish to place and will not be held responsible for mistakes that could have been made during the placing of such bets, including the stake amounts, price or side of the bet”.

It is easy to make mistakes in the busy, last-minute frenzy of betting and trading on a betting exchange in the moments before a race and even the most experienced users can sometimes back a horse they wanted to lay, or vice versa. Automated betting programmes, or “bots”, are also used by high-volume gamblers to place multiple bets, and these can occasionally malfunction with unpredictable, and potentially expensive, consequences.

It is a well-established principle of exchange betting, however, that mistakes are paid for by the punters who make them, as the integrity of the exchange depends on the knowledge that matched bets will be honoured. Mapplebeck took the case to Ibas and, having considered it for several months, the arbitration service issued a judgment in his favour last week.

The ruling makes it clear that Ibas believes the account which offered the bet had been hacked but also suggests the account’s entire balance of about £31,000 had been offered as a bet at 1.01. Since Mapplebeck’s stake accounted for little more than 10% of the total, it is possible that other customers of the exchange also took advantage but were denied their payout when the bets were voided.

Smarkets declined to comment on the specifics of the case on Monday, or on the possibility that other customers had taken some or all of the remaining £28,000 on offer.

“Ibas obliges all parties to keep its dispute process and decisions confidential,” the company said, “so we cannot make specific comment about the circumstances of this case. However, we always endeavour to treat customer complaints fairly and we have abided by Ibas’s ruling. We keep our terms, policies and procedures under continuous review to ensure we can offer a fair and transparent platform for betting.”
Report timbuctooth November 26, 2021 4:42 PM GMT
CHARLATANS!!!
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 4:45 PM GMT
4.4 now, £20,064 matched.
Report ----you-have-to-laugh--- November 26, 2021 4:48 PM GMT
Mike smithson retweeted a
post about it.
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 5:09 PM GMT
Saw that one, from Shadsy originally.
Report politicspunter November 26, 2021 10:11 PM GMT
Pip Moss
@PipsFunFacts
·
32m
Replying to
@shadsy
It's like betting on 2020 after the voters were counted all over again, just a lot slower.

Laugh
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com